Frederico Ferreira Silva and Moez Echargui will play each other in the 2nd round of the Porto Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:00 am on EUPAGO. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Frederico Ferreira Silva who should win in 3 sets.
Frederico Ferreira Silva -> 1.75
Moez Echargui -> 1.99
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Frederico Ferreira Silva vs. Moez Echargui
There is no head to head record between Frederico Ferreira Silva and Moez Echargui since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Frederico Ferreira Silva
20 - 11win/loss
253
168
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-24 | 20-7 | 13-13 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 51-27 | 37-13 | 14-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 20-32 | 5-13 | 9-12 | 4-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-26 | 11-10 | 11-12 | 8-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-28 | 11-10 | 8-10 | 7-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 263, the Portuguese got to the 2nd round after defeating Marc-Andrea Huesler 7-5 4-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Frederico defeated Huesler (7-5 4-6 6-3). During the match, Ferreira Silva scored 107 points vs Huesler’s 96. Ferreira Silva was pretty aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ferreira Silva bagged 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Frederico Ferreira Silva lost the serve 3 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Ferreira Silva put 60% of his first serves in, winning 66% (44/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 60% (27/45) on the 2nd serve. Frederico broke Huesler 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Ferreira Silva has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (344-224). 12-2 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ferreira Silva has a compiled 171-84 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Frederico’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio.
Ferreira Silva has a composed 20-11 win-loss record in 2025, 12-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Porto Challenger
Moez Echargui
47 - 14win/loss
136
136
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 70-22 | 63-13 | 4-4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-28 | 12-13 | 12-14 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-34 | 23-10 | 23-22 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-29 | 7-2 | 37-26 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-24 | 38-17 | 4-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 312, Echargui reached the 2nd round after beating Thomas Braithwaite 6-2 6-2, Diogo Marques 6-1 6-4 and Khumoun Sultanov 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round against Sultanov, The Tunisian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-73 6-4 6-4). During the match Echargui scored 101 points vs Sultanov’s 91. Echargui was pretty aggressive to blast 40 winners.
About the serving games, Echargui made 7 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Overall, Moez Echargui was extremely efficient on serve to win 73% (40/55) of his 1st serve and 52% (22/42) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Echargui broke Sultanov 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Moez’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Monastir and M25 Monastir.
Moez has a composed 47-14 win-loss record in 2025, 43-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Porto Challenger
The Tunisian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ferreira Silva | Echargui |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 66 |
| Pts | 107-96 | 226-173 |
| Total Points | 203 | 399 |
| Winners | 44 | 84 |
| %Winners | 41% | 37% |
Ferreira Silva played 1 match while Echargui competed in 3 matches. Echargui started his run from the qualifications while Ferreira Silva had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Frederico Ferreira Silva lost 1 set, while Moez Echargui lost 1 set. Ferreira Silva has played 4 set(s) less than Echargui (3 vs 7). Therefore, Ferreira Silva played 35 games less than Echargui. Frederico scored 44 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The Tunisian recorded 84 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ferreira Silva | Echargui |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 19 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 6.3 |
| 1st in | 67/112 | 110/200 |
| %1st in | 60% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 44/67 | 84/110 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 27/45 | 49/90 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 54% |
Ferreira Silva struck 4 aces . Echargui recorded 19 aces (6.3 per match). Ferreira Silva won 66% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Echargui won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ferreira Silva | Echargui |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 14 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 14/31 |
| % Converted | 50% | 45% |
| Conceded | 13 | 16 |
| Saved | 10 | 11 |
| % Saved | 77% | 69% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 5 |
Frederico broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Ferreira Silva dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded. Echargui broke his opponents 14 times with a 45% conversion rate. Moez conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ferreira Silva | |||
| R1 Huesler | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 107-96 | 107-96 | |
| Total points | 203 | 203 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 67/112 | 67/112 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 44/67 | 44/67 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 27/45 | 27/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 10/13 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 77% | 77% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Echargui | |||||
| Q1 Braithwaite | Q3 Marques | R1 Sultanov | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-1 6-4 | 6-73 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 17 | 33 | 66 | |
| pts | 64-42 | 61-40 | 101-91 | 226-173 | |
| Total points | 106 | 101 | 192 | 399 | |
| Winners | 19 | 25 | 40 | 84 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 41% | 40% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 7 | 7 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 3 | 7 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 25/50 | 30/53 | 55/97 | 110/200 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 57% | 57% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 19/25 | 25/30 | 40/55 | 84/110 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 83% | 73% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 12/23 | 22/42 | 49/90 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 52% | 52% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 5 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 4/9 | 5/9 | 14/31 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 44% | 56% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 6 | 6 | 16 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 5/6 | 3/6 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 83% | 50% | 208% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
Tennis Scores in Porto Challenger
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Martin LandaluceLandaluce (4-6 7-64 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Henrique RochaRocha – Eliakim CoulibalyCoulibaly (7-6(6) 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Matias SotoSoto (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Elias YmerYmer – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (6-3 3-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Moez EcharguiEchargui (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – George LoffhagenLoffhagen (0-0) – H2H and prediction