Botic Van De Zandschulp and Daniel Masur will play each other in the 2nd round of the Hagen Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on PLATZMANN CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 2 sets.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.114
Daniel Masur -> 5.65
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Daniel Masur
This will be the 2nd time that Botic Van De Zandschulp and Daniel Masur fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Masur (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Masur won 5-7 6-4 6-4 in the semifinal in Netherlands F2 back in 2016.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
18 - 20win/loss
77
22
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-32 | 13-11 | 11-10 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 87, Botic got to the 2nd round after beating Luka Mikrut 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Van De Zandschulp had a good straight sets win against Mikrut (6-4 6-2). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 67 points vs Mikrut’s 47. Van De Zandschulp was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van De Zandschulp made 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 75% of his first serves in, win 94% (31/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (5/11) on the 2nd serve. Van De Zandschulp broke Mikrut 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Van De Zandschulp has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (341-216). 10-9 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Van De Zandschulp has a compiled 147-92 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The Dutch’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in Kitzbuhel.
The Dutch has a compiled 18-20 win-loss record in 2025, 10-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Hagen Challenger
Botic has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Masur
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 23-27 | 9-6 | 8-11 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 47-26 | 1-2 | 11-10 | 22-11 | 1-2 | 12-1 |
| 2023 | 34-24 | 7-8 | 9-7 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 4-9 | 5-3 | 4-2 |
| 2021 | 28-26 | 4-4 | 1-7 | 15-12 | 3-2 | 5-1 |
Ranked no. 539, the German reached the 2nd round after beating Justin Engel 7-6(4) 6-2.
In the 1st round, Masur had a good straight sets win against Engel (7-64 6-2). During the match Masur scored 81 points vs Engel’s 68. Masur was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Masur made 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Daniel Masur lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Masur put 65% of his first serves in, winning 70% (31/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (12/24) on the 2nd serve. The German broke Engel 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Daniel’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Cervia.
Daniel has an aggregate 9-17 win-loss record in 2025, 8-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 21 |
| Pts | 67-47 | 81-68 |
| Total Points | 114 | 149 |
| Winners | 31 | 31 |
| %Winners | 46% | 38% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Masur played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Van De Zandschulp and Masur have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Van De Zandschulp played 3 games less than Masur. Van De Zandschulp scored 31 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Masur blasted 31 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 2 |
| 1st in | 33/44 | 44/68 |
| %1st in | 75% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 31/33 | 31/44 |
| %1st pts | 94% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 5/11 | 12/24 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 50% |
Van De Zandschulp made 7 aces . Masur bagged 2 aces . Van De Zandschulp won 94% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Masur won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 43% | 42% |
| Conceded | 0 | 9 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | 0% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The Dutch broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Van De Zandschulp pretty solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. The German broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Masur conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Mikrut | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 67-47 | 67-47 | |
| Total points | 114 | 114 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 33/44 | 33/44 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 31/33 | 31/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 94% | 94% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Masur | |||
| R1 Engel | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 81-68 | 81-68 | |
| Total points | 149 | 149 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 44/68 | 44/68 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 31/44 | 31/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/24 | 12/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Hagen Challenger
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Dmitry PopkoPopko (3-6 6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Olle WallinWallin – Clement TaburTabur (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Daniel MasurMasur (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Dmitry PopkoPopko (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction