Jack Pinnington Jones and Jakub Nicod will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Liberec Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on SVIJANY COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jakub Nicod who should win in 3 sets.
Jakub Nicod -> 1.64
Jack Pinnington Jones -> 2.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jack Pinnington Jones vs. Jakub Nicod
There is no head to head record between Jack Pinnington Jones and Jakub Nicod since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Jack Pinnington Jones
16 - 9win/loss
202
177
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24-15 | 9-5 | 2-1 | 2-4 | 11-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 29-12 | 21-8 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-8 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-12 | 9-7 | 8-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-13 | 6-5 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 196, Pinnington Jones reached the 2nd round after defeating Sebastian Gima 4-6 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round against Gima, Jack recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-1). During the match, Pinnington Jones scored 82 points vs Gima’s 64. Pinnington Jones was very aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Pinnington Jones scored 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Jack Pinnington Jones was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 73% (37/51) of his 1st serve and 67% (14/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Jack broke Gima 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Pinnington Jones has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 64% of his matches (96-54). 1-0 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Pinnington Jones has an overall23-9 record in the last 6 years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Nottingham 3 Challenger where he defeated Kyle Edmund in the final 6-4 7-6(1).
The Brit has a compiled 16-9 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Liberec Challenger
The Brit has never competed in this tournament before.
Jakub Nicod
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 20-14 | 2-1 | 17-12 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 47-16 | 24-7 | 17-7 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-18 | 15-4 | 18-12 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-6 | 4-2 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 441, Jakub got to the 2nd round after defeating Jan Klimas 6-3 0-6 6-4, Filip Pieczonka 3-6 6-4 6-2 and Murkel Dellien 6-3 7-5.
In the 1st round, Nicod had a good straight sets win against Alejandro Dellien Velasco (6-3 7-5). During the match Nicod scored 69 points vs Alejandro Dellien Velasco’s 55. Nicod was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Nicod scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Jakub Nicod lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Nicod put 51% of his first serves in, winning 76% (26/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (14/33) on the 2nd serve. Jakub was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Alejandro Dellien Velasco 5 times.
Nicod’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Ceska Lipa and M15 Kamen.
Jakub has an aggregate 15-8 win-loss record in 2025, 14-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Liberec Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pinnington Jones | Nicod |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 73 |
| Pts | 82-64 | 221-212 |
| Total Points | 146 | 433 |
| Winners | 37 | 80 |
| %Winners | 45% | 36% |
Pinnington Jones played 1 match while Nicod competed in 3 matches. Nicod started his run from the qualifications while Pinnington Jones had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Jack Pinnington Jones conceded 1 set, while Jakub Nicod conceded 2 sets. Pinnington Jones has played 5 set(s) less than Nicod (3 vs 8). Therefore, Pinnington Jones played 47 games less than Nicod. Pinnington Jones scored 37 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Nicod blasted 80 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pinnington Jones | Nicod |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 1.7 |
| 1st in | 51/72 | 111/221 |
| %1st in | 71% | 50% |
| 1st pts | 37/51 | 80/111 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 52/110 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 47% |
Pinnington Jones recorded 2 aces . Nicod blasted 5 aces (1.7 per match). Pinnington Jones won 73% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Nicod won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pinnington Jones | Nicod |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 14 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 14/19 |
| % Converted | 57% | 74% |
| Conceded | 2 | 21 |
| Saved | 1 | 11 |
| % Saved | 50% | 52% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 10 |
Pinnington Jones broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Jack dropped his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Jakub broke his opponents 14 times with a 74% conversion rate. The Czech conceded his serve 10 times and he saved 52% of the break points that he conceded.
| Pinnington Jones | |||
| R1 Gima | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 82-64 | 82-64 | |
| Total points | 146 | 146 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 51/72 | 51/72 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 37/51 | 37/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 14/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Nicod | |||||
| Q1 Klimas | Q3 Pieczonka | R1 Alejandro Dellien Velasco | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 0-6 6-4 | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 27 | 21 | 73 | |
| pts | 68-77 | 84-80 | 69-55 | 221-212 | |
| Total points | 145 | 164 | 124 | 433 | |
| Winners | 25 | 29 | 26 | 80 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 35% | 38% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 7 | 4 | 17 | |
| 1st in | 36/76 | 41/78 | 34/67 | 111/221 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 53% | 51% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 25/36 | 29/41 | 26/34 | 80/111 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 71% | 76% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/40 | 20/37 | 14/33 | 52/110 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 54% | 42% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 5 | 14 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 5/9 | 5/5 | 14/19 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 56% | 100% | 74% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 6 | 7 | 21 | |
| Saved | 4/8 | 3/6 | 4/7 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | 57% | 157% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
Tennis Scores in Liberec Challenger
- Norbert GombosGombos – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (1-6 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Jakub NicodNicod – Murkel DellienDellien (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Michael GeertsGeerts (4-6 7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Petr BrunclikBrunclik (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex BarrenaBarrena – Jonas KuceraKucera (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Sascha Gueymard WayenburgGueymard Wayenburg – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (6-2 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrej MartinMartin – Eero VasaVasa (7-64 6-73 6-2) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Sebastian GimaGima (4-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Diego DeduraDedura – Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini (6-1 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Milos KarolKarol (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Alex MolcanMolcan (4-6 7-5 7-63) – See score progression
- Gonzalo BuenoBueno – Hynek BartonBarton (6-73 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Maxim MrvaMrva – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Federico CoriaCoria – Martin KrumichKrumich (6-2 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Alex BarrenaBarrena – Jonas KuceraKucera (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Federico CoriaCoria – Martin KrumichKrumich (6-2 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Sebastian GimaGima (4-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Milos KarolKarol (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Alex BarrenaBarrena – Jonas KuceraKucera (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (6-4 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Gonzalo BuenoBueno – Hynek BartonBarton (6-7(3) 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Alex MolcanMolcan (4-6 7-5 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (1-6 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Diego DeduraDedura – Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini (6-1 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrej MartinMartin – Eero VasaVasa (7-6(4) 6-7(3) 6-2) – See score progression
- Maxim MrvaMrva – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrej MartinMartin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Norbert GombosGombos – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – (0-1) – H2H and prediction