Vilius Gaubas and Joel Schwaerzler will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Hagen Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on PLATZMANN CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Vilius Gaubas who should win in 3 sets.
Vilius Gaubas -> 1.571
Joel Schwaerzler -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Vilius Gaubas vs. Joel Schwaerzler
There is no head to head record between Vilius Gaubas and Joel Schwaerzler since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Vilius Gaubas
25 - 19win/loss
130
128
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 40-28 | 1-4 | 36-19 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 48-35 | 7-4 | 40-28 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-26 | 3-3 | 55-21 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-17 | 4-4 | 15-12 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 149, the Lithuanian reached the 2nd round after defeating Lautaro Midon 6-3 6-7(2) 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Lithuanian defeated Midon (6-3 6-72 6-1). During the match, Gaubas scored 104 points vs Midon’s 87. The Lithuanian was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gaubas scored just 1 ace during the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Vilius Gaubas lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Gaubas put 63% of his first serves in, winning 69% (40/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (21/34) on the 2nd serve. Vilius broke Midon 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Gaubas has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 60% of his matches (154-103). 21-11 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gaubas has a composed133-76 match record in the last 5 years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Menorca Challenger where he beat Pol Martin Tiffon in the final 6-0 6-4.
Gaubas has an overall 25-19 win-loss record in 2025, 21-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Hagen Challenger
The Lithuanian has never competed in this tournament before.
Joel Schwaerzler
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-26 | 0-0 | 39-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 25-23 | 3-3 | 21-16 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 6-9 | 1-2 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 354, Schwaerzler reached the 2nd round after beating Mariano Kestelboim 6-3 3-6 7-6(3).
In the 1st round, Joel defeated Kestelboim (6-3 3-6 7-63). During the match Schwaerzler scored 101 points vs Kestelboim’s 99. Schwaerzler was pretty aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Schwaerzler struck 9 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Overall, Joel Schwaerzler was extremely effective on serve to win 72% (41/57) of his 1st serve and 57% (24/42) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Joel broke Kestelboim twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Schwaerzler’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Klosters and Lucciana.
The Austrian has an overall 28-17 win-loss record in 2025, 28-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gaubas | Schwaerzler |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 31 |
| Pts | 104-87 | 101-99 |
| Total Points | 191 | 200 |
| Winners | 40 | 41 |
| %Winners | 38% | 41% |
Both Gaubas and Schwaerzler played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Vilius Gaubas surrendered 1 set, while Joel Schwaerzler conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Gaubas and Schwaerzler have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Gaubas played 2 games less than Schwaerzler. Vilius scored 40 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Joel managed to score 41 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gaubas | Schwaerzler |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 9 |
| 1st in | 58/92 | 57/99 |
| %1st in | 63% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 40/58 | 41/57 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 21/34 | 24/42 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 57% |
Gaubas managed to score 1 ace . Schwaerzler also recorded 9 aces . Gaubas won 69% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Schwaerzler won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gaubas | Schwaerzler |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 2 |
| Converted | 5/13 | 2/6 |
| % Converted | 38% | 33% |
| Conceded | 3 | 8 |
| Saved | 1 | 6 |
| % Saved | 33% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Lithuanian broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Gaubas dropped his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Schwaerzler broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Joel conceded his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gaubas | |||
| R1 Midon | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-72 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 104-87 | 104-87 | |
| Total points | 191 | 191 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 58/92 | 58/92 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 40/58 | 40/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/34 | 21/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Schwaerzler | ||||
| R1 Kestelboim | R1 Kestelboim | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 7-63 | 6-3 3-6 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | 62 | |
| pts | 101-99 | 101-99 | 202-198 | |
| Total points | 200 | 200 | 400 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | 82 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 57/99 | 57/99 | 114/198 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 41/57 | 41/57 | 82/114 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/42 | 24/42 | 48/84 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | 16 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 6/8 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | 150% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Hagen Challenger
- Guy Den OudenDen Ouden – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Dali BlanchBlanch (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Lautaro MidonMidon (6-3 6-72 6-1) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Dali BlanchBlanch (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Justin EngelEngel (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Alexander DonskiDonski (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Olle WallinWallin – Max SchoenhausSchoenhaus (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Luka MikrutMikrut (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler – Mariano KestelboimKestelboim (6-3 3-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Niels McdonaldMcdonald – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (4-6 6-3 7-61) – See score progression
- Clement TaburTabur – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Luka MikrutMikrut (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Justin EngelEngel (7-6(4) 6-2) – See score progression
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Dali BlanchBlanch (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Guy Den OudenDen Ouden – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Niels McdonaldMcdonald – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (4-6 6-3 7-6(1)) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Alexander DonskiDonski (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Olle WallinWallin – Max SchoenhausSchoenhaus (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler – Mariano KestelboimKestelboim (6-3 3-6 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Lautaro MidonMidon (6-3 6-7(2) 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Daniel MasurMasur (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Dmitry PopkoPopko (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction