Clement Tabur and Olle Wallin will square off in the 2nd round of the Hagen Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on MARK-E POWER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Clement Tabur who should win in 3 sets.
Clement Tabur -> 1.42
Olle Wallin -> 2.7
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Clement Tabur vs. Olle Wallin
There is no head to head record between Clement Tabur and Olle Wallin since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Clement Tabur
38 - 16win/loss
201
198
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 49-24 | 11-7 | 30-15 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-33 | 2-4 | 25-26 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 62-25 | 16-7 | 45-14 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-26 | 20-8 | 16-11 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-22 | 9-4 | 25-17 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 233, the French player reached the 2nd round after defeating Benjamin Hassan 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, The French player had a good straight sets win against Hassan (6-4 6-4). During the match, Tabur scored 71 points vs Hassan’s 61. Tabur was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Tabur blasted 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Clement Tabur was very effective on serve to win 78% (31/40) of his 1st serve and 57% (16/28) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Clement broke Hassan twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Tabur has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 61% of his matches (289-188). 29-12 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Tabur has an overall177-110 record in the last 9 years on clay.
The French player best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Reus,M25 Angers and M25 Vic.
Clement has a composed 38-16 win-loss record in 2025, 29-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Hagen Challenger
Clement has never competed in this tournament before.
Olle Wallin
27 - 15win/loss
456
402
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 40-26 | 19-11 | 17-11 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-10 | 0-2 | 10-4 | 16-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 4-5 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-5 | 15-1 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 465 (career-high), Olle reached the 2nd round after beating Alessio Vasquez 6-4 6-2
, Florian Broska 6-2 4-6 6-4 and Max Schoenhaus 6-2 6-3.In the 1st round, Olle had a good straight sets win against Schoenhaus (6-2 6-3). During the match Wallin scored 62 points vs Schoenhaus’s 43. Wallin was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Wallin struck 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Olle Wallin lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Wallin put 53% of his first serves in, winning 85% (22/26) of the points behind his 1st serve and 35% (8/23) on the 2nd serve. The Swede broke Schoenhaus 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Wallin’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Sanxenxo.
The Swede has an aggregate 27-15 win-loss record in 2025, 12-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tabur | Wallin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 63 |
| Pts | 71-61 | 217-168 |
| Total Points | 132 | 385 |
| Winners | 31 | 90 |
| %Winners | 44% | 41% |
Tabur played 1 match while Wallin competed in 3 matches. Wallin started his run from the qualifications while Tabur had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Olle Wallin conceded 1 set while Clement Tabur hasn’t lost a set so far. Tabur has played 5 set(s) less than Wallin (2 vs 7). Therefore, Tabur played 43 games less than Wallin. Clement scored 31 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The Swede blasted 90 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tabur | Wallin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 21 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 7 |
| 1st in | 40/68 | 114/188 |
| %1st in | 59% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 31/40 | 90/114 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 16/28 | 32/74 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 43% |
Tabur managed to score 2 aces . Wallin managed to score 21 aces (7 per match). Tabur won 78% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Wallin won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tabur | Wallin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 14 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 14/28 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 3 | 15 |
| Saved | 3 | 10 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
The French player broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Clement pretty effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 3 break points. Olle broke his opponents 14 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Swede conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tabur | |||
| R1 Hassan | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 71-61 | 71-61 | |
| Total points | 132 | 132 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 40/68 | 40/68 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 31/40 | 31/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/28 | 16/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Wallin | |||||
| Q1 Vasquez | Q3 Broska | R1 Schoenhaus | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 28 | 17 | 63 | |
| pts | 65-46 | 90-79 | 62-43 | 217-168 | |
| Total points | 111 | 169 | 105 | 385 | |
| Winners | 25 | 43 | 22 | 90 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 48% | 35% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 6 | 7 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 32/53 | 56/86 | 26/49 | 114/188 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 65% | 53% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 25/32 | 43/56 | 22/26 | 90/114 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 77% | 85% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 11/30 | 8/23 | 32/74 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 37% | 35% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 6 | 14 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 5/9 | 6/11 | 14/28 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 56% | 55% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 7 | 4 | 15 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4/7 | 2/4 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 57% | 50% | 207% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tennis Scores in Hagen Challenger
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Lautaro MidonMidon (6-3 6-72 6-1) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Dali BlanchBlanch (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Justin EngelEngel (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Alexander DonskiDonski (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Olle WallinWallin – Max SchoenhausSchoenhaus (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Luka MikrutMikrut (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler – Mariano KestelboimKestelboim (6-3 3-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Niels McdonaldMcdonald – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (4-6 6-3 7-61) – See score progression
- Guy Den OudenDen Ouden – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Dali BlanchBlanch (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Clement TaburTabur – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Luka MikrutMikrut (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Justin EngelEngel (7-6(4) 6-2) – See score progression
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Dali BlanchBlanch (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Guy Den OudenDen Ouden – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Niels McdonaldMcdonald – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (4-6 6-3 7-6(1)) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Alexander DonskiDonski (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Olle WallinWallin – Max SchoenhausSchoenhaus (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler – Mariano KestelboimKestelboim (6-3 3-6 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Lautaro MidonMidon (6-3 6-7(2) 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Daniel MasurMasur (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Dmitry PopkoPopko (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction