Mukund Sasikumar and Aleksandre Bakshi will face off in the 2nd round of the Astana Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mukund Sasikumar who should win in 3 sets.
Mukund Sasikumar -> 1.571
Aleksandre Bakshi -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Mukund Sasikumar vs. Aleksandre Bakshi
There is no head to head record between Mukund Sasikumar and Aleksandre Bakshi since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Mukund Sasikumar
17 - 14win/loss
519
229
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 35-25 | 29-19 | 3-1 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-33 | 39-32 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-31 | 21-25 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-35 | 33-21 | 6-7 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-32 | 25-24 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 461, Kumar Mukund got to the 2nd round after defeating Shunsuke Nakagawa 6-1 6-4, Zura Tkemaladze 6-3 7-6(2) and Saba Purtseladze 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Indian had a good straight sets win against Purtseladze (6-4 6-4). During the match, Kumar Mukund scored 57 points vs Purtseladze’s 46. Kumar Mukund was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kumar Mukund fired 8 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Mukund Sasikumar was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 89% (31/35) of his 1st serve and 71% (10/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Sasi broke Purtseladze twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Kumar Mukund has favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (314-279). 11-9 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Kumar Mukund has a composed 243-193 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Sasi’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Baotou and M15 Luan.
Sasi has an overall 17-14 win-loss record in 2025, 11-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Astana Challenger
Sasi has never competed in this tournament before.
Aleksandre Bakshi
17 - 16win/loss
538
448
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-23 | 33-20 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-26 | 34-22 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 20-18 | 19-15 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-17 | 22-13 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-17 | 8-7 | 10-8 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 620, the Georgean reached the 2nd round after beating Kokoro Isomura 6-1 6-7(2) 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Georgean defeated Isomura (6-1 6-72 6-3). During the match Bakshi scored 107 points vs Isomura’s 89. Bakshi was exceptionally aggressive to blast 52 winners.
Talking about serving, Bakshi overwhelmed his opponent with 21 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Aleksandre Bakshi conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 3 break points. Furthermore, Bakshi put 61% of his first serves in, winning 91% (52/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (15/37) on the 2nd serve. Aleksandre broke Isomura 3 times after converting 27% of his break points (3/11).
Aleksandre’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Sharm ElSheikh.
Bakshi has a compiled 17-16 win-loss record in 2025, 16-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Astana Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kumar Mukund | Bakshi |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 59 | 29 |
| Pts | 193-147 | 107-89 |
| Total Points | 340 | 196 |
| Winners | 94 | 52 |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% |
Kumar Mukund played 3 matches while Bakshi competed in 1 match. Kumar Mukund started his run from the qualifications while Bakshi had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Aleksandre Bakshi lost 1 set while Mukund Sasikumar hasn’t conceded a set so far. Kumar Mukund has played 3 sets more than Bakshi (6 vs 3). Therefore, Kumar Mukund played 30 games more than Bakshi. Kumar Mukund scored 94 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Bakshi blasted 52 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kumar Mukund | Bakshi |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 23 | 21 |
| Avg per match | 7.7 | 21 |
| 1st in | 123/175 | 57/94 |
| %1st in | 70% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 94/123 | 52/57 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 91% |
| 2nd pts | 33/52 | 15/37 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 41% |
Kumar Mukund bagged 23 aces (7.7 per match). Bakshi blasted 21 aces . Kumar Mukund won 76% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Bakshi won 91% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kumar Mukund | Bakshi |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 3 |
| Converted | 8/16 | 3/11 |
| % Converted | 50% | 27% |
| Conceded | 7 | 3 |
| Saved | 5 | 3 |
| % Saved | 71% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Kumar Mukund broke his opponents 8 times with a 50% conversion rate. Sasi conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Bakshi broke his opponent 3 times with a 27% conversion rate. Aleksandre was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Kumar Mukund | |||||
| Q1 Nakagawa | Q3 Tkemaladze | R1 Purtseladze | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | 6-3 7-62 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 22 | 20 | 59 | |
| pts | 61-44 | 75-57 | 57-46 | 193-147 | |
| Total points | 105 | 132 | 103 | 340 | |
| Winners | 30 | 33 | 31 | 94 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 44% | 54% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 6 | 8 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 43/60 | 45/66 | 35/49 | 123/175 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 68% | 71% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 30/43 | 33/45 | 31/35 | 94/123 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 73% | 89% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 14/21 | 10/14 | 33/52 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 67% | 71% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 2/7 | 2/4 | 8/16 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 29% | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 3 | 0 | 7 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 2/3 | 0/0 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 67% | – | 47% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| Bakshi | |||||
| R1 Isomura | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-72 6-3 | ||||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |||
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |||
| pts | 107-89 | 107-89 | |||
| Total points | 196 | 196 | |||
| Winners | 52 | 52 | |||
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 21 | 21 | |||
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |||
| 1st in | 57/94 | 57/94 | |||
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |||
| 1st pts | 52/57 | 52/57 | |||
| % 1st pts | 91% | 91% | |||
| 2nd pts | 15/37 | 15/37 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |||
| Converted | 3/11 | 3/11 | |||
| Converted % | 27% | 27% | |||
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |||
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |||
| Saved % | 100% | 33% | |||
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |||
Tennis Scores in Astana Challenger
- Olaf PieczkowskiPieczkowski – Dominik PalanPalan (7-62 7-5) – See score progression
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Erik ArutiunianArutiunian (6-1 6-74 7-5) – See score progression
- Mitsuki Wei Kang LeongWei Kang Leong – Maksim ShinShin (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Mukund SasikumarSasikumar – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Luca CastelnuovoCastelnuovo – Uisung ParkPark (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Maximus JonesJones – Renta TokudaTokuda (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Edward WinterWinter – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Woobin ShinShin – Arda AzkaraAzkara (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Sanhui ShinShin (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Shintaro ImaiImai – Amir OmarkhanovOmarkhanov (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Karan SinghSingh – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Maxim ZhukovZhukov (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexandr BindaBinda – Petr Bar BiryukovBar Biryukov (6-3 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Aleksandre BakshiBakshi – Kokoro IsomuraIsomura (6-1 6-72 6-3) – See score progression
- Ricardas BerankisBerankis – Zangar NurlanulyNurlanuly (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Sanhui ShinShin (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mitsuki Wei Kang LeongWei Kang Leong – Maksim ShinShin (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Woobin ShinShin – Arda AzkaraAzkara (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Maxim ZhukovZhukov (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Olaf PieczkowskiPieczkowski – Dominik PalanPalan (7-6(2) 7-5) – See score progression
- Edward WinterWinter – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Shintaro ImaiImai – Amir OmarkhanovOmarkhanov (6-2 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Luca CastelnuovoCastelnuovo – Uisung ParkPark (7-6(3) 6-3) – See score progression
- Maximus JonesJones – Renta TokudaTokuda (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Luca CastelnuovoCastelnuovo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandre BakshiBakshi – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Takuya KumasakaKumasaka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Woobin ShinShin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction