Aidan Mayo and Martin Damm will play each other in the qualifications of the Lexington Challenger for the 1^st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on STADIUM 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Martin Damm who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Martin Damm is the pick to win this match.
Martin Damm -> 1.6
Aidan Mayo -> 2.22

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Aidan Mayo vs. Martin Damm

There is no head to head record between Aidan Mayo and Martin Damm since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.

Aidan Mayo

Ranked no. 289, Mayo got to the qualifications after beating Strong Kirchheimer 6-3 4-6 6-3.

In the qualifications, The American defeated Kirchheimer (6-3 4-6 6-3). During the match, Mayo scored 90 points vs Kirchheimer’s 73. Mayo was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.

Talking about the service games, Mayo made 12 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Aidan Mayo was quite effective on serve to win 86% (30/35) of his 1st serve and 70% (23/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Aidan broke Kirchheimer 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).

Mayo has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 54% of his matches (137-116). 15-9 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Mayo has an aggregate92-68 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.

Aidan has a composed 16-19 win-loss record in 2025, 15-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Lexington Challenger

Martin Damm

Ranked no. 440, Martin got to the qualifications after beating Trey Hilderbrand 6-3 6-4.

In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Hilderbrand (6-3 6-4). During the match Damm scored 64 points vs Hilderbrand’s 50. Martin was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.

Talking about serving, Damm bagged 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Martin Damm was very efficient on serve to win 90% (27/30) of his 1st serve and 61% (17/28) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Damm broke Hilderbrand twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).

Martin’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh,M25 Tbilisi,M15 Vaasa and M25 Elvas.

Damm has an aggregate 31-10 win-loss record in 2025, 29-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Lexington Challenger

Previously, his best result was reaching the 1^st round in 2023. See his history.

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Mayo	Damm
Match played	1	1
Tot Set	3	2
Tot Games	28	19
Pts	90-73	64-50
Total Points	163	114
Winners	30	27
%Winners	33%	42%

Both Mayo and Damm played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Aidan Mayo surrendered 1 set while Martin Damm hasn’t lost a set so far. Mayo has played 1 set more than Damm (3 vs 2). Therefore, Mayo played 9 games more than Damm. Mayo scored 30 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Martin managed to score 27 winners (42%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Mayo	Damm
Aces	12	9
Avg per match	12	9
1st in	35/68	30/58
%1st in	51%	52%
1st pts	30/35	27/30
%1st pts	86%	90%
2nd pts	23/33	17/28
%2nd pts	70%	61%

Mayo struck 12 aces . Damm managed to score 9 aces . Mayo won 86% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 70% of the points. On the other side, Damm won 90% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Mayo	Damm
Won	3	2
Converted	3/7	2/5
% Converted	43%	40%
Conceded	1	4
Saved	0	4
% Saved	0%	100%
Times Broken	1	0

Mayo broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The American surrendered his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Martin was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points.

Mayo
	Q1 Kirchheimer	Total
Score	6-3 4-6 6-3
Tot Set	3	3
Tot Games	28	28
pts	90-73	90-73
Total points	163	163
Winners	30	30
%Winners	33%	33%
SERVE
Aces	12	12
Double Faults	2	2
1st in	35/68	35/68
% 1st in	51%	51%
1st pts	30/35	30/35
% 1st pts	86%	86%
2nd pts	23/33	23/33
% 2nd pts	70%	70%
Breaks
Won	3	3
Converted	3/7	3/7
Converted %	43%	43%
Conceded	1	1
Saved	0/1	0
Saved %	0%	0%
Times Broken	1	1

Damm
	Q1 Hilderbrand	Total
Score	6-3 6-4
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	19	19
pts	64-50	64-50
Total points	114	114
Winners	27	27
%Winners	42%	42%
SERVE
Aces	9	9
Double Faults	3	3
1st in	30/58	30/58
% 1st in	52%	52%
1st pts	27/30	27/30
% 1st pts	90%	90%
2nd pts	17/28	17/28
% 2nd pts	61%	61%
Breaks
Won	2	2
Converted	2/5	2/5
Converted %	40%	40%
Conceded	4	4
Saved	4/4	4
Saved %	100%	100%
Times Broken	0	0

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Daniel EvansEvans – Andres AndradeAndrade (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Alex RybakovRybakov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Tung-Lin WuWu – Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda (1-0) – H2H and prediction
• Hady HabibHabib – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Nicolas MejiaMejia – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Lloyd HarrisHarris – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
• Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Dhakshineswar SureshSuresh – Andre IlaganIlagan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – (2-1) – H2H and prediction
• Garrett JohnsJohns – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Stefan DostanicDostanic (0-1) – H2H and prediction