Eero Vasa and Yanaki Milev will play each other in the qualifications of the Liberec Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on PERNERKA COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Eero Vasa who should win in 3 sets.
Eero Vasa -> 1.74
Yanaki Milev -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Eero Vasa vs. Yanaki Milev
There is no head to head record between Eero Vasa and Yanaki Milev since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Eero Vasa
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 35-26 | 0-1 | 30-19 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 46-29 | 15-8 | 25-13 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 15-14 | 8-6 | 7-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-15 | 7-6 | 5-4 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-13 | 2-2 | 10-7 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 502 (career-high), he will start his run in the Liberec Challenger after he played his last match in the Liberec Challenger where he beat 6-1 6-2 to Petak in the qualifications on the 27th of July.
Vasa has an aggregate 22-18 win-loss record in 2025, 22-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Vasa’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Kotka and M15 Lodz.
Talking about his overall career, Eero has an overall 165-132 record. He has a positive 91-66 record on clay.
Previously in the Liberec Challenger
Eero has never competed in this tournament before.
Yanaki Milev
17 - 17win/loss
705
443
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-28 | 3-2 | 25-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-27 | 0-1 | 39-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-26 | 0-0 | 35-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-15 | 4-3 | 17-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 799, Yanaki got to the qualifications after defeating Michael Vrbensky 4-6 7-5 7-6(4).
In the qualifications against Vrbensky, Milev recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 7-64). During the match Milev scored 107 points vs Vrbensky’s 104. Yanaki was quite aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Milev fired 3 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Yanaki Milev lost the serve 6 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Milev put 58% of his first serves in, winning 65% (41/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (21/46) on the 2nd serve. The Bulgarian broke Vrbensky 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Milev’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Kursumlijska Banja.
The Bulgarian has an aggregate 17-17 win-loss record in 2025, 13-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Vasa | Milev |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 35 |
| Pts | 56-29 | 107-104 |
| Total Points | 85 | 211 |
| Winners | 18 | 41 |
| %Winners | 32% | 38% |
Both Vasa and Milev played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Yanaki Milev conceded 1 set while Eero Vasa hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Vasa has played 1 set(s) less than Milev (2 vs 3). Therefore, Vasa played 20 games less than Milev. Vasa scored 18 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Milev struck 41 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Vasa | Milev |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3 |
| 1st in | 19/39 | 63/109 |
| %1st in | 49% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 18/19 | 41/63 |
| %1st pts | 95% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 15/20 | 21/46 |
| %2nd pts | 75% | 46% |
Vasa struck 4 aces . Milev blasted 3 aces . Vasa won 95% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 75% of the points. On the other side, Milev won 65% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Vasa | Milev |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/4 | 6/10 |
| % Converted | 100% | 60% |
| Conceded | 0 | 10 |
| Saved | 0 | 4 |
| % Saved | 0% | 40% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 6 |
Eero broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. Eero pretty solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Yanaki broke his opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Bulgarian conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded.
| Vasa | ||
| Total | ||
|---|---|---|
| Score | ||
| Tot Set | 0 | |
| Tot Games | 0 | |
| pts | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | |
| %Winners | 0% | |
| SERVE | ||
| Aces | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | |
| 1st in | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | % | |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | |
| Breaks | ||
| Won | 0 | |
| Converted | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | |
| Saved | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | |
| Milev | |||
| Q1 Vrbensky | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-5 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 107-104 | 107-104 | |
| Total points | 211 | 211 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 63/109 | 63/109 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 41/63 | 41/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/46 | 21/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 4/10 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Norbert GombosGombos (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Sebastian GimaGima (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Martin KrumichKrumich – (0-0) – H2H and prediction