Mark Lajal and Andres Martin will face off in the final of the Bloomfield Hills Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 1:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mark Lajal who should win in 3 sets.
Mark Lajal -> 1.51
Andres Martin -> 2.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Mark Lajal vs. Andres Martin
There is no head to head record between Mark Lajal and Andres Martin since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Mark Lajal
27 - 13win/loss
146
145
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46-25 | 20-10 | 6-4 | 15-8 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-30 | 18-14 | 0-3 | 15-10 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 25-16 | 5-2 | 16-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 35-12 | 2-6 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-7 | 5-4 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 181, the Estonian reached the final after defeating Omar Jasika 6-0 6-3, August Holmgren 6-1 6-2, Arthur Fery 6-1 5-7 6-3 and Yu Hsiou Hsu 6-3 6-0.
In the semifinal, The Estonian had a good straight sets win against Hsiou Hsu (6-3 6-0). During the match, Lajal scored 56 points vs Hsiou Hsu’s 29. Mark was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lajal struck 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Mark Lajal was extremely efficient on serve to win 96% (23/24) of his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Lajal broke Hsiou Hsu 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mark has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to conquer 61% of the points he played.
Lajal has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 61% of his matches (162-103). 11-4 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lajal has an aggregate94-50 record in the last 5 years on hard.
The Estonian’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Oeiras 3 Challenger,the Francavilla Challenger and the Bloomfield Hills Challenger.
Lajal has an overall 27-13 win-loss record in 2025, 11-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bloomfield Hills Challenger
Andres Martin
39 - 16win/loss
264
264
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 47-28 | 32-18 | 9-4 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 19-16 | 14-11 | 0-1 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-17 | 14-11 | 1-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-8 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 335 (career-high), the American reached the final after beating Hady Habib 6-2 6-2, Yuta Shimizu 7-5 6-3, Alexis Galarneau 4-6 7-6(6) 6-1 and Eliot Spizzirri 6-1 7-6(5).
In the semifinal, Andres had a good straight sets win against Spizzirri (6-1 7-65). During the match Martin scored 64 points vs Spizzirri’s 50. The American was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Martin scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Andres Martin lost the serve once. Furthermore, Martin put 69% of his first serves in, winning 70% (30/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 68% (13/19) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Spizzirri 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Andres’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Kingston and M25 Calabasas.
Andres has a composed 39-16 win-loss record in 2025, 30-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bloomfield Hills Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lajal | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 73 | 87 |
| Pts | 255-160 | 296-245 |
| Total Points | 415 | 541 |
| Winners | 114 | 128 |
| %Winners | 45% | 43% |
Both Lajal and Martin played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Mark Lajal surrendered 1 set, while Andres Martin conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Lajal and Martin have played the same amount of sets 9. However, Lajal played 14 games less than Martin. Lajal scored 114 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Andres fired 128 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lajal | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 22 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 5.5 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 134/208 | 183/276 |
| %1st in | 64% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 114/134 | 128/183 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 40/74 | 50/93 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 54% |
Lajal bagged 22 aces (5.5 per match). Martin fired 9 aces (2.3 per match). Lajal won 85% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Martin won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lajal | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 17 | 17 |
| Converted | 17/31 | 17/32 |
| % Converted | 55% | 53% |
| Conceded | 6 | 18 |
| Saved | 4 | 11 |
| % Saved | 67% | 61% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 7 |
Mark broke his opponents 17 times with a 55% conversion rate. Lajal conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 17 times with a 53% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 61% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lajal | ||||||
| R1 Jasika | R2 Holmgren | 1/4 Fery | 1/2 Hsiou | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-3 | 6-1 6-2 | 6-1 5-7 6-3 | 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | 28 | 15 | 73 | |
| pts | 55-27 | 53-29 | 91-75 | 56-29 | 255-160 | |
| Total points | 82 | 82 | 166 | 85 | 415 | |
| Winners | 25 | 28 | 38 | 23 | 114 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 53% | 42% | 41% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 5 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 27/38 | 32/47 | 51/84 | 24/39 | 134/208 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 68% | 61% | 62% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 25/27 | 28/32 | 38/51 | 23/24 | 114/134 | |
| % 1st pts | 93% | 88% | 75% | 96% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 7/15 | 17/33 | 9/15 | 40/74 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 47% | 52% | 60% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 17 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/5 | 5/11 | 4/9 | 17/31 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 80% | 45% | 44% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 4/6 | 0/0 | 4 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 67% | – | 17% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Martin | ||||||
| R1 Habib | R2 Shimizu | 1/4 Galarneau | 1/2 Spizzirri | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 7-5 6-3 | 4-6 7-66 6-1 | 6-1 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 21 | 30 | 20 | 87 | |
| pts | 56-37 | 70-59 | 106-99 | 64-50 | 296-245 | |
| Total points | 93 | 129 | 205 | 114 | 541 | |
| Winners | 22 | 33 | 43 | 30 | 128 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 47% | 41% | 47% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 33/44 | 45/67 | 62/103 | 43/62 | 183/276 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 67% | 60% | 69% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 22/33 | 33/45 | 43/62 | 30/43 | 128/183 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 73% | 69% | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 11/22 | 20/41 | 13/19 | 50/93 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 50% | 49% | 68% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 6 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 17 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 3/7 | 5/10 | 3/4 | 17/32 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 43% | 50% | 75% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 18 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 3/4 | 7/10 | 0/1 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 75% | 70% | 0% | 45% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |