Mark Lajal and Yu Hsiou Hsu will face off in the semifinal of the Bloomfield Hills Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 12:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mark Lajal who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Mark Lajal is the pick to win this match.
Mark Lajal -> 1.363
Yu Hsiou Hsu -> 2.93

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Mark Lajal vs. Yu Hsiou Hsu

There is no head to head record between Mark Lajal and Yu Hsiou Hsu since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.

Mark Lajal

Mark Lajal

27 - 13win/loss

Hard
11-4
I Hard
5-2
Clay
6-4
Grass
5-3
Rank
146
High
145
WLWLLWWLWL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 46-25 20-10 6-4 15-8 5-3 0-0
2024 38-30 18-14 0-3 15-10 5-3 0-0
2023 46-29 25-16 5-2 16-11 0-0 0-0
2022 46-24 35-12 2-6 9-6 0-0 0-0
2021 5-7 5-4 0-2 0-1 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 181, the Estonian reached the semifinal after beating Omar Jasika 6-0 6-3, August Holmgren 6-1 6-2 and Arthur Fery 6-1 5-7 6-3.

In the quarter, The Estonian defeated Fery (6-1 5-7 6-3). During the match, Lajal scored 91 points vs Fery’s 75. Lajal was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.

Regarding the service games, Lajal managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Mark Lajal was extremely efficient on serve to win 75% (38/51) of his 1st serve and 52% (17/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Lajal broke Fery 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).

Overall Performance in this tournament

The Estonian has lost 1 set in this event to conquer 60% of the points he played.

Lajal has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 61% of his matches (161-103). 10-4 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lajal has an aggregate93-50 match record in the last 5 years on hard.

Lajal’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Oeiras 3 Challenger and the Francavilla Challenger.

Mark has a composed 26-13 win-loss record in 2025, 10-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Bloomfield Hills Challenger

Bloomfield Hills Challenger
Lajal's Record

Yu Hsiou Hsu

Yu Hsiou Hsu

27 - 20win/loss

Hard
24-16
I Hard
0-0
Clay
3-4
Rank
219
High
158
LLWLWLWLWW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 44-31 39-25 3-4 2-2 0-0 0-0
2024 42-30 38-25 0-0 4-3 0-2 0-0
2023 32-21 30-15 2-2 0-1 0-3 0-0
2022 54-24 47-18 5-3 2-3 0-0 0-0
2021 53-23 49-16 4-7 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 236, the Chinese reached the semifinal after beating Nishesh Basavareddy 6-3 6-4, Aidan Mayo 6-3 6-2 and Tung-Lin Wu 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(4).

In the quarter, Hsiou defeated Wu (7-65 3-6 7-64).During the match Hsiou scored less points (6) than Wu. In fact, the world no. 181 won 119 points vs Wu’s. That means that Hsiou was more focused during the important points. Hsiou was exceptionally aggressive to blast 48 winners.

Talking about serving, Hsiou bagged 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Yu Hsiou Hsu lost the serve 4 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Hsiou put 62% of his first serves in, winning 67% (48/72) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (23/44) on the 2nd serve. Yu broke Wu 3 times after converting 23% of his break points (3/13).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Yu has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.

Hsiou’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Timaru.

Hsiou has a compiled 27-19 win-loss record in 2025, 24-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Bloomfield Hills Challenger
Hsiou's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

M.Lajal
Y.Hsiou Hsu
4h:06
4h:06
Time on court​
6h:08
6h:08
!
2h:16
2h:16
Last match​
!
3h:10
3h:10
3
3
Match played
3
3
58
58
Games Played​
71
71
7
7
Set played​​
7
7
199
199
Total points​
250
250
66.3
66.3
Avg point​
83.3
83.3
91
91
Winners
101
101
30.3
30.3
Avg Winners​
33.7
33.7
46%
46%
Ratio winners
40%
40%
-- Serve --
14
14
Aces
17
17
4.7
4.7
Avg Aces
5.7
5.7
5
5
Double Faults
6
6
1.7
1.7
Avg Double Faults
2
2
91/110
91/110
1st won total​
101/140
101/140
!
83%
83%
1st won %
!
72%
72%
31/59
31/59
2nd won total​
48/83
48/83
53%
53%
2nd won %
58%
58%
-- Break Points --
13/22
13/22
BP won
8/27
8/27
4.3/7.3
4.3/7.3
Avg BP won
2.7/9
2.7/9
!
59%
59%
Won
30%
30%
6
6
Conceded
10
10
2
2
Avg Conceded
3.3
3.3
2
2
Broken
4
4
!
0.7
0.7
Avg Broken
1.3
1.3
4
4
Saved
6
6

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Lajal Hsiou
Match played 3 3
Tot Set 7 7
Tot Games 58 71
Pts 199-131 250-224
Total Points 330 474
Winners 91 101
%Winners 46% 40%

Both Lajal and Hsiou played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Mark Lajal dropped 1 set, while Yu Hsiou Hsu surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Lajal and Hsiou have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Lajal played 13 games less than Hsiou. Mark scored 91 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Hsiou blasted 101 winners (40%).

Serve Performance

Serve Lajal Hsiou
Aces 14 17
Avg per match 4.7 5.7
1st in 110/169 140/223
%1st in 65% 63%
1st pts 91/110 101/140
%1st pts 83% 72%
2nd pts 31/59 48/83
%2nd pts 53% 58%

Lajal struck 14 aces (4.7 per match). Hsiou bagged 17 aces (5.7 per match). Lajal won 83% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Hsiou won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Lajal Hsiou
Won 13 8
Converted 13/22 8/27
% Converted 59% 30%
Conceded 6 10
Saved 4 6
% Saved 67% 60%
Times Broken 2 4

The Estonian broke his opponents 13 times with a 59% conversion rate. Mark lost his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Yu broke his opponents 8 times with a 30% conversion rate. Yu conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.

Lajal
R1
Jasika
R2
Holmgren
1/4
Fery
Total
Score 6-0 6-3 6-1 6-2 6-1 5-7 6-3
Tot Set 2 2 3 7
Tot Games 15 15 28 58
pts 55-27 53-29 91-75 199-131
Total points 82 82 166 330
Winners 25 28 38 91
%Winners 45% 53% 42% 46%
SERVE
Aces 5 4 5 14
Double Faults 0 3 2 5
1st in 27/38 32/47 51/84 110/169
% 1st in 71% 68% 61% 65%
1st pts 25/27 28/32 38/51 91/110
% 1st pts 93% 88% 75% 83%
2nd pts 7/11 7/15 17/33 31/59
% 2nd pts 64% 47% 52% 53%
Breaks
Won 4 4 5 13
Converted 4/6 4/5 5/11 13/22
Converted % 67% 80% 45% 59%
Conceded 0 0 6 6
Saved 0/0 0/0 4/6 4
Saved % 67% 22%
Times Broken 0 0 2 2
Hsiou
R1
Basavareddy
R2
Mayo
1/4
Wu
Total
Score 6-3 6-4 6-3 6-2 7-65 3-6 7-64
Tot Set 2 2 3 7
Tot Games 19 17 35 71
pts 68-52 63-47 119-125 250-224
Total points 120 110 244 474
Winners 30 23 48 101
%Winners 44% 37% 40% 40%
SERVE
Aces 8 4 5 17
Double Faults 1 1 4 6
1st in 35/55 33/52 72/116 140/223
% 1st in 64% 63% 62% 63%
1st pts 30/35 23/33 48/72 101/140
% 1st pts 86% 70% 67% 72%
2nd pts 11/20 14/19 23/44 48/83
% 2nd pts 55% 74% 52% 58%
Breaks
Won 2 3 3 8
Converted 2/6 3/8 3/13 8/27
Converted % 33% 38% 23% 30%
Conceded 0 0 10 10
Saved 0/0 0/0 6/10 6
Saved % 60% 20%
Times Broken 0 0 4 4

Tennis Scores in Bloomfield Hills Challenger

  • Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirriYi ZhouZhou (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
  • Andres MartinMartinAlexis GalarneauGalarneau (4-6 7-66 6-1) – See score progression
  • Mark LajalLajalArthur FeryFery (6-1 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
  • Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou HsuTung-Lin WuWu (7-65 3-6 7-64) – See score progression
  • Stefan Dostanic/Benjamin KittayDostanic/Benjamin KittayAnirudh Chandrasekar/Ramkumar RamanathanChandrasekar/Ramkumar Ramanathan (4-6 6-4 10-7) – See score progression
  • Yu Hsiou Hsu/Tsung-Hao HuangHsiou Hsu/Tsung-Hao HuangBlake Bayldon/Trey HilderbrandBayldon/Trey Hilderbrand (0-6 6-4 10-2) – See score progression

Upcoming matches in the draw