Mark Lajal and Yu Hsiou Hsu will face off in the semifinal of the Bloomfield Hills Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 12:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mark Lajal who should win in 2 sets.
Mark Lajal -> 1.363
Yu Hsiou Hsu -> 2.93
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Mark Lajal vs. Yu Hsiou Hsu
There is no head to head record between Mark Lajal and Yu Hsiou Hsu since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Mark Lajal
27 - 13win/loss
146
145
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46-25 | 20-10 | 6-4 | 15-8 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-30 | 18-14 | 0-3 | 15-10 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 25-16 | 5-2 | 16-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 35-12 | 2-6 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-7 | 5-4 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 181, the Estonian reached the semifinal after beating Omar Jasika 6-0 6-3, August Holmgren 6-1 6-2 and Arthur Fery 6-1 5-7 6-3.
In the quarter, The Estonian defeated Fery (6-1 5-7 6-3). During the match, Lajal scored 91 points vs Fery’s 75. Lajal was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lajal managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Mark Lajal was extremely efficient on serve to win 75% (38/51) of his 1st serve and 52% (17/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Lajal broke Fery 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Estonian has lost 1 set in this event to conquer 60% of the points he played.
Lajal has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 61% of his matches (161-103). 10-4 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lajal has an aggregate93-50 match record in the last 5 years on hard.
Lajal’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Oeiras 3 Challenger and the Francavilla Challenger.
Mark has a composed 26-13 win-loss record in 2025, 10-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bloomfield Hills Challenger
Yu Hsiou Hsu
27 - 20win/loss
219
158
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 44-31 | 39-25 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-30 | 38-25 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-21 | 30-15 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 54-24 | 47-18 | 5-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 49-16 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 236, the Chinese reached the semifinal after beating Nishesh Basavareddy 6-3 6-4, Aidan Mayo 6-3 6-2 and Tung-Lin Wu 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(4).
In the quarter, Hsiou defeated Wu (7-65 3-6 7-64).During the match Hsiou scored less points (6) than Wu. In fact, the world no. 181 won 119 points vs Wu’s. That means that Hsiou was more focused during the important points. Hsiou was exceptionally aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about serving, Hsiou bagged 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Yu Hsiou Hsu lost the serve 4 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Hsiou put 62% of his first serves in, winning 67% (48/72) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (23/44) on the 2nd serve. Yu broke Wu 3 times after converting 23% of his break points (3/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Yu has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Hsiou’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Timaru.
Hsiou has a compiled 27-19 win-loss record in 2025, 24-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lajal | Hsiou |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 58 | 71 |
| Pts | 199-131 | 250-224 |
| Total Points | 330 | 474 |
| Winners | 91 | 101 |
| %Winners | 46% | 40% |
Both Lajal and Hsiou played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Mark Lajal dropped 1 set, while Yu Hsiou Hsu surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Lajal and Hsiou have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Lajal played 13 games less than Hsiou. Mark scored 91 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Hsiou blasted 101 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lajal | Hsiou |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 14 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 4.7 | 5.7 |
| 1st in | 110/169 | 140/223 |
| %1st in | 65% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 91/110 | 101/140 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 31/59 | 48/83 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 58% |
Lajal struck 14 aces (4.7 per match). Hsiou bagged 17 aces (5.7 per match). Lajal won 83% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Hsiou won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lajal | Hsiou |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 13 | 8 |
| Converted | 13/22 | 8/27 |
| % Converted | 59% | 30% |
| Conceded | 6 | 10 |
| Saved | 4 | 6 |
| % Saved | 67% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
The Estonian broke his opponents 13 times with a 59% conversion rate. Mark lost his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Yu broke his opponents 8 times with a 30% conversion rate. Yu conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lajal | |||||
| R1 Jasika | R2 Holmgren | 1/4 Fery | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-3 | 6-1 6-2 | 6-1 5-7 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | 28 | 58 | |
| pts | 55-27 | 53-29 | 91-75 | 199-131 | |
| Total points | 82 | 82 | 166 | 330 | |
| Winners | 25 | 28 | 38 | 91 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 53% | 42% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 4 | 5 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 27/38 | 32/47 | 51/84 | 110/169 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 68% | 61% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 25/27 | 28/32 | 38/51 | 91/110 | |
| % 1st pts | 93% | 88% | 75% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 7/15 | 17/33 | 31/59 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 47% | 52% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 5 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/5 | 5/11 | 13/22 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 80% | 45% | 59% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 67% | 22% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Hsiou | |||||
| R1 Basavareddy | R2 Mayo | 1/4 Wu | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | 7-65 3-6 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 17 | 35 | 71 | |
| pts | 68-52 | 63-47 | 119-125 | 250-224 | |
| Total points | 120 | 110 | 244 | 474 | |
| Winners | 30 | 23 | 48 | 101 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 37% | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 4 | 5 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 35/55 | 33/52 | 72/116 | 140/223 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 63% | 62% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 30/35 | 23/33 | 48/72 | 101/140 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 70% | 67% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 14/19 | 23/44 | 48/83 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 74% | 52% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 3/8 | 3/13 | 8/27 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 38% | 23% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 6/10 | 6 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 60% | 20% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Bloomfield Hills Challenger
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Yi ZhouZhou (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Andres MartinMartin – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (4-6 7-66 6-1) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Arthur FeryFery (6-1 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Tung-Lin WuWu (7-65 3-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Stefan Dostanic/Benjamin KittayDostanic/Benjamin Kittay – Anirudh Chandrasekar/Ramkumar RamanathanChandrasekar/Ramkumar Ramanathan (4-6 6-4 10-7) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou Hsu/Tsung-Hao HuangHsiou Hsu/Tsung-Hao Huang – Blake Bayldon/Trey HilderbrandBayldon/Trey Hilderbrand (0-6 6-4 10-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction