Yu Hsiou Hsu and Tung-Lin Wu will square off in the quarter of the Bloomfield Hills Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 4:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tung-Lin Wu who should win in 3 sets.
Tung-Lin Wu -> 1.83
Yu Hsiou Hsu -> 1.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Yu Hsiou Hsu vs. Tung-Lin Wu
This will be the 4th
time that Yu Hsiou Hsu and Tung-Lin Wu clash against each other. The head to head is 2-1 for Wu (see full H2H stats), 2-1 on hard.The last time that they played, Wu won 6-4 6-3 in the 1st round in the Busan Challenger back in 2024.
Yu Hsiou Hsu
27 - 19win/loss
219
158
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 44-31 | 39-25 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-30 | 38-25 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-21 | 30-15 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 54-24 | 47-18 | 5-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 49-16 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 236, Hsiou Hsu got to the quarter after defeating Nishesh Basavareddy 6-3 6-4 and Aidan Mayo 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Yu had a good straight sets win against Mayo (6-3 6-2). During the match, Hsiou Hsu scored 63 points vs Mayo’s 47. Yu was exceptionally aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Hsiou Hsu made 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Yu Hsiou Hsu conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 63% of his first serves in, win 70% (23/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 74% (14/19) on the 2nd serve. Hsiou Hsu broke Mayo 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Yu hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to win 57% of the points he played.
Hsiou Hsu has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (293-175). 23-15 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Hsiou Hsu has a composed 256-134 match record in the last years on hard.
Hsiou Hsu’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Timaru.
Yu has a composed 26-19 win-loss record in 2025, 23-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bloomfield Hills Challenger
Hsiou Hsu has never competed in this tournament before.
Tung-Lin Wu
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24-26 | 21-18 | 3-3 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-43 | 32-40 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-28 | 21-21 | 4-5 | 3-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-24 | 26-14 | 6-3 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-26 | 10-10 | 2-8 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 286, Wu got to the quarter after beating Stefan Dostanic 6-4 6-3, Spencer Johnson 6-2 6-2, Patrick Maloney 7-6(11) 6-2 and Li Tu 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4.
In the 2nd round against Tu, Tung-Lin recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-62
6-4). During the match Wu scored 96 points vs Tu’s 93. Wu was extremely aggressive to blast 52 winners.About the serving games, Wu fired 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Tung-Lin Wu was very efficient on serve to win 75% (52/69) of his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Tung-Lin broke Tu once after converting 25% of his break points (1/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Wu started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Wu has a compiled 10-15 win-loss record in 2025, 7-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bloomfield Hills Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hsiou Hsu | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 36 | 88 |
| Pts | 131-99 | 297-248 |
| Total Points | 230 | 545 |
| Winners | 53 | 145 |
| %Winners | 40% | 49% |
Hsiou Hsu played 2 matches while Wu competed in 4 matches. Wu started his run from the qualifications while Hsiou Hsu had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Tung-Lin Wu lost 1 set while Yu Hsiou Hsu hasn’t conceded a set so far. Hsiou Hsu has played 5 set(s) less than Wu (4 vs 9). Therefore, Hsiou Hsu played 52 games less than Wu. Hsiou Hsu scored 53 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Tung-Lin bagged 145 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hsiou Hsu | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 3.3 |
| 1st in | 68/107 | 188/274 |
| %1st in | 64% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 53/68 | 145/188 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 25/39 | 53/86 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 62% |
Hsiou Hsu managed to score 12 aces (6 per match). Wu scored 13 aces (3.3 per match). Hsiou Hsu won 78% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Wu won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hsiou Hsu | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 10 |
| Converted | 5/14 | 10/20 |
| % Converted | 36% | 50% |
| Conceded | 0 | 18 |
| Saved | 0 | 17 |
| % Saved | 0% | 94% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Yu broke his opponents 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Chinese pretty solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Chinese broke his opponents 10 times with a 50% conversion rate. Tung-Lin conceded his serve once and he saved 94% of the break points that he conceded.
| Hsiou Hsu | ||||
| R1 Basavareddy | R2 Mayo | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 17 | 36 | |
| pts | 68-52 | 63-47 | 131-99 | |
| Total points | 120 | 110 | 230 | |
| Winners | 30 | 23 | 53 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 37% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 4 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 35/55 | 33/52 | 68/107 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 63% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 30/35 | 23/33 | 53/68 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 70% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 14/19 | 25/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 74% | 64% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 3/8 | 5/14 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 38% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Wu | ||||||
| Q1 Dostanic | Q3 Johnson | R1 Maloney | R2 Tu | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 6-2 6-2 | 7-611 6-2 | 3-6 7-62 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 16 | 21 | 32 | 88 | |
| pts | 67-52 | 60-38 | 74-65 | 96-93 | 297-248 | |
| Total points | 119 | 98 | 139 | 189 | 545 | |
| Winners | 30 | 27 | 36 | 52 | 145 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | 49% | 54% | 49% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 1 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 40/60 | 35/51 | 44/68 | 69/95 | 188/274 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 69% | 65% | 73% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 30/40 | 27/35 | 36/44 | 52/69 | 145/188 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 77% | 82% | 75% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 9/16 | 14/24 | 17/26 | 53/86 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 56% | 58% | 65% | 62% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 4/6 | 2/3 | 1/4 | 10/20 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 67% | 67% | 25% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 18 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 2/2 | 1/1 | 10/11 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 196% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Bloomfield Hills Challenger
- Stefan Dostanic/Benjamin KittayDostanic/Benjamin Kittay – Anirudh Chandrasekar/Ramkumar RamanathanChandrasekar/Ramkumar Ramanathan (4-6 6-4 10-7) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Tung-Lin WuWu (1-2) – H2H and prediction