Filip Misolic and Botic Van De Zandschulp will play each other in the 2nd round of the Generali Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Filip Misolic who should win in 3 sets.
Filip Misolic -> 1.66
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 2.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Filip Misolic vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
There is no head to head record between Filip Misolic and Botic Van De Zandschulp since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Filip Misolic
49 - 16win/loss
79
79
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 53-27 | 8-7 | 36-11 | 6-8 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 16-22 | 1-4 | 15-16 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-28 | 6-9 | 25-13 | 8-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-18 | 5-4 | 31-12 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 46-16 | 0-1 | 44-13 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 97 (career-high), Filip reached the 2nd round after defeating Tomas Martin Etcheverry 7-5 5-7 6-3.
In the 1st round, Filip defeated Etcheverry (7-5 5-7 6-3). During the match, Misolic scored 103 points vs Etcheverry’s 98. Filip was extremely aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Regarding the service games, Misolic fired 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Filip Misolic lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Misolic put 61% of his first serves in, winning 70% (44/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (21/40) on the 2nd serve. Misolic broke Etcheverry 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Misolic has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 64% of his matches (208-117). 36-10 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Misolic has a compiled169-78 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Prague Challenger where he beat Guy Den Ouden in the final 6-4 6-0 and the Poznan Challenger where he overcame Dalibor Svrcina in the final 6-2 6-0.
Misolic has a compiled 49-16 win-loss record in 2025, 36-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Kitzbuhel
Botic Van De Zandschulp
15 - 19win/loss
77
22
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-32 | 13-11 | 11-10 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 103, the Dutch reached the 2nd round after defeating Nicolas Jarry 6-4 4-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Van De Zandschulp defeated Jarry (6-4 4-6 6-3). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 87 points vs Jarry’s 82. Botic was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Van De Zandschulp bagged 4 aces and he was not very consistent on his 2nd serve to score 10 double faults. Overall, Botic Van De Zandschulp was very efficient on serve to win 72% (34/47) of his 1st serve and 61% (22/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Botic broke Jarry 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
The Dutch has a compiled 15-19 win-loss record in 2025, 7-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Misolic | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 29 |
| Pts | 103-98 | 87-82 |
| Total Points | 201 | 169 |
| Winners | 44 | 34 |
| %Winners | 43% | 39% |
Both Misolic and Van De Zandschulp played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Filip Misolic conceded 1 set, while Botic Van De Zandschulp lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Misolic and Van De Zandschulp have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Misolic played 4 games more than Van De Zandschulp. Misolic scored 44 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch recorded 34 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Misolic | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4 |
| 1st in | 63/103 | 47/83 |
| %1st in | 61% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 44/63 | 34/47 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 21/40 | 22/36 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 61% |
Misolic struck 3 aces . Van De Zandschulp struck 4 aces . Misolic won 70% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Misolic | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 57% | 75% |
| Conceded | 9 | 6 |
| Saved | 6 | 4 |
| % Saved | 67% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
Misolic broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Austrian lost his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Van De Zandschulp conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Misolic | |||
| R1 Etcheverry | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 5-7 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 103-98 | 103-98 | |
| Total points | 201 | 201 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 63/103 | 63/103 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 44/63 | 44/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/40 | 21/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Jarry | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 87-82 | 87-82 | |
| Total points | 169 | 169 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 10 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 47/83 | 47/83 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 34/47 | 34/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/36 | 22/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Kitzbuhel
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Nicolas JarryJarry (6-4 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (7-5 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Sebastian OfnerOfner (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Ignacio BuseBuse (6-3 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Santiago Gonzalez/Austin KrajicekGonzalez/Austin Krajicek – Pedro Martinez Portero/Alexander ShevchenkoMartinez Portero/Alexander Shevchenko (7-60 6-3) – See score progression
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Justin EngelEngel (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Jaime FariaFaria (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Hugo GastonGaston (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler (6-2 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Facundo BagnisBagnis (7-64 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Tristan BoyerBoyer (6-3 7-61) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Jaime FariaFaria (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Justin EngelEngel (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (7-5 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Ignacio BuseBuse (6-3 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Sebastian OfnerOfner (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Sebastian BaezBaez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander BublikBublik – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Norbert GombosGombos (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – Marton FucsovicsFucsovics (2-1) – H2H and prediction