Geoffrey Blancaneaux and Stefanos Sakellaridis will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Zug Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Geoffrey Blancaneaux who should win in 3 sets.
Geoffrey Blancaneaux -> 1.52
Stefanos Sakellaridis -> 2.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Geoffrey Blancaneaux vs. Stefanos Sakellaridis
There is no head to head record between Geoffrey Blancaneaux and Stefanos Sakellaridis since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
21 - 23win/loss
248
134
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30-35 | 0-5 | 23-22 | 7-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 24-33 | 6-5 | 13-19 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-37 | 7-10 | 14-18 | 8-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-38 | 17-10 | 14-15 | 8-10 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-31 | 8-6 | 17-19 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
Ranked no. 257, Geoffrey got to the 2nd round after defeating Lorenzo Giustino 7-6(7) 6-4.
In the 1st round, Blancaneaux had a good straight sets win against Giustino (7-67 6-4). During the match, Blancaneaux scored 74 points vs Giustino’s 72. The French player was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Blancaneaux recorded 2 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Geoffrey Blancaneaux lost the serve 4 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Blancaneaux put 51% of his first serves in, winning 58% (22/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (18/36) on the 2nd serve. Geoffrey broke Giustino 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Blancaneaux has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (324-276). 19-16 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Blancaneaux has a composed 168-140 match record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Brazzaville Challenger where he overcame Calvin Hemery in the final 6-3 6-4.
Blancaneaux has a composed 21-23 win-loss record in 2025, 19-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zug Challenger
Stefanos Sakellaridis
35 - 15win/loss
275
275
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 53-27 | 37-14 | 11-8 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 43-29 | 35-25 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 66-52 | 35-26 | 30-23 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 66-49 | 23-13 | 38-33 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-36 | 5-1 | 29-35 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 393, the Greek got to the 2nd round after defeating Michiel De Krom 6-1 6-2, Lukas Pokorny 4-6 7-5 6-3 and Benjamin Hassan 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Greek had a good straight sets win against Hassan (6-4 6-3). During the match Sakellaridis scored 66 points vs Hassan’s 47. Stefanos was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Sakellaridis blasted 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Stefanos Sakellaridis was extremely efficient on serve to win 71% (27/38) of his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Sakellaridis broke Hassan 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
The Greek’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir and M15 Heraklion.
Stefanos has an overall 35-15 win-loss record in 2025, 9-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zug Challenger
The Greek has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Blancaneaux | Sakellaridis |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 65 |
| Pts | 74-72 | 225-168 |
| Total Points | 146 | 393 |
| Winners | 22 | 85 |
| %Winners | 30% | 38% |
Blancaneaux played 1 match while Sakellaridis competed in 3 matches. Sakellaridis started his run from the qualifications while Blancaneaux had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Stefanos Sakellaridis surrendered 1 set while Geoffrey Blancaneaux hasn’t conceded a set so far. Blancaneaux has played 5 set(s) less than Sakellaridis (2 vs 7). Therefore, Blancaneaux played 42 games less than Sakellaridis. Blancaneaux scored 22 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, Stefanos fired 85 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Blancaneaux | Sakellaridis |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 5.7 |
| 1st in | 38/74 | 107/181 |
| %1st in | 51% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 22/38 | 85/107 |
| %1st pts | 58% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 18/36 | 43/74 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 58% |
Blancaneaux blasted 2 aces . Sakellaridis blasted 17 aces (5.7 per match). Blancaneaux won 58% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Sakellaridis won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Blancaneaux | Sakellaridis |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 13 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 13/31 |
| % Converted | 83% | 42% |
| Conceded | 5 | 9 |
| Saved | 1 | 5 |
| % Saved | 20% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
The French player broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Blancaneaux dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 20% of the break points that he conceded. The Greek broke his opponents 13 times with a 42% conversion rate. The Greek conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Blancaneaux | |||
| R1 Giustino | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-67 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 74-72 | 74-72 | |
| Total points | 146 | 146 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 38/74 | 38/74 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 22/38 | 22/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 58% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/36 | 18/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 1/5 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 20% | 20% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Sakellaridis | |||||
| Q1 De | Q3 Pokorny | R1 Hassan | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 31 | 19 | 65 | |
| pts | 61-37 | 98-84 | 66-47 | 225-168 | |
| Total points | 98 | 182 | 113 | 393 | |
| Winners | 21 | 37 | 27 | 85 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 38% | 41% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 5 | 6 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 2 | 1 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 24/44 | 45/86 | 38/51 | 107/181 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 52% | 75% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 21/24 | 37/45 | 27/38 | 85/107 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 82% | 71% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/20 | 27/41 | 8/13 | 43/74 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 66% | 62% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 2 | 5 | 13 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 2/6 | 5/12 | 13/31 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 33% | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 1/2 | 2/4 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 50% | 50% | 167% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Zug Challenger
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Dominic StrickerStricker (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Alexander RitschardRitschard (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (7-67 6-4) – See score progression
- Jakub PaulPaul – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Remy BertolaBertola (4-6 6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Daniel Merida AguilarMerida Aguilar (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Marat SharipovSharipov (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Adolfo Daniel VallejoDaniel Vallejo – Facundo MenaMena (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Stefanos SakellaridisSakellaridis – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Petr BrunclikBrunclik (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Mika BrunoldBrunold – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Henry BernetBernet – Murkel DellienDellien (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Kilian FeldbauschFeldbausch (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (5-7 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Alexander RitschardRitschard (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (7-6(7) 6-4) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Petr BrunclikBrunclik (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Marat SharipovSharipov (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Adolfo Daniel VallejoDaniel Vallejo – Facundo MenaMena (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Jakub PaulPaul – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Daniel Merida AguilarMerida Aguilar (7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Nerman FaticFatic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jakub PaulPaul – Calvin HemeryHemery (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Elias YmerYmer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – (0-0) – H2H and prediction