Zsombor Piros and Nerman Fatic will play each other in the 2nd round of the Zug Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 5:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zsombor Piros who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Zsombor Piros is the pick to win this match.
Zsombor Piros -> 1.4
Nerman Fatic -> 2.77
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Zsombor Piros vs. Nerman Fatic
This will be the 3rd time that Zsombor Piros and Nerman Fatic square off. The head to head is 1-1 for Piros and Fatic (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Piros won 4-6 6-3 6-1 in the 1st round in the Split Challenger back in 2024.
Zsombor Piros
32 - 12win/loss
164
106
LWLWWWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-16 | 6-4 | 26-8 | 7-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-29 | 1-6 | 17-17 | 13-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-29 | 3-2 | 35-18 | 5-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-23 | 7-6 | 19-9 | 10-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-16 | 3-2 | 31-9 | 13-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 168, Zsombor got to the 2nd round after defeating Alexander Ritschard 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Piros had a good straight sets win against Ritschard (6-3 6-2). During the match, Piros scored 56 points vs Ritschard’s 39. Zsombor was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Piros struck 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Zsombor Piros was exceptionally effective on serve to win 83% (24/29) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Hungarian broke Ritschard 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Piros has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (295-175). 23-6 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Piros has a compiled 192-96 match record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Ostrava Challenger where he overcame Hady Habib in the final 6-3 6-2 and the Tunis Challenger where he overcame Titouan Droguet in the final 7-5 7-6(3).
The Hungarian has an overall 32-12 win-loss record in 2025, 23-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zug Challenger
The Hungarian has never competed in this tournament before.
Nerman Fatic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 47-18 | 2-1 | 44-15 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 23-26 | 3-5 | 19-20 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-28 | 0-1 | 35-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-27 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-26 | 1-1 | 30-22 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 248, Fatic reached the 2nd round after beating Dimitar Kuzmanov 5-7 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round against Kuzmanov, Fatic recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-4 6-2). During the match Fatic scored 92 points vs Kuzmanov’s 76. Nerman was quite aggressive to blast 36 winners.
About the serving games, Fatic bagged 8 aces and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Nerman Fatic was extremely efficient on serve to win 77% (36/47) of his 1st serve and 63% (19/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Fatic broke Kuzmanov 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Fatic’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Antalya,M15 Porec,M15 Dubrovnik,the Skopje Challenger and the Perugia Challenger.
Fatic has an overall 35-10 win-loss record in 2025, 35-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Piros | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 30 |
| Pts | 56-39 | 92-76 |
| Total Points | 95 | 168 |
| Winners | 24 | 36 |
| %Winners | 43% | 39% |
Both Piros and Fatic played 1 match. At the moment, Nerman Fatic dropped 1 set while Zsombor Piros hasn’t dropped a set so far. Piros has played 1 set(s) less than Fatic (2 vs 3). Therefore, Piros played 13 games less than Fatic. Zsombor scored 24 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Fatic managed to score 36 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Piros | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 8 |
| 1st in | 29/48 | 47/77 |
| %1st in | 60% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 24/29 | 36/47 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 19/30 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 63% |
Piros managed to score 3 aces . Fatic managed to score 8 aces . Piros won 83% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Fatic won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Piros | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 43% | 71% |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The Hungarian broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Zsombor extremely effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Nerman broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Nerman conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Piros | |||
| R1 Ritschard |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 56-39 | 56-39 | |
| Total points | 95 | 95 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 29/48 | 29/48 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 24/29 | 24/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Fatic | |||
| R1 Kuzmanov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 92-76 | 92-76 | |
| Total points | 168 | 168 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 47/77 | 47/77 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 36/47 | 36/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/30 | 19/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLWWL
LWLLWLWWLW Tennis Scores in Zug Challenger
- Elias YmerYmer – Remy BertolaBertola (4-6 6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Daniel Merida AguilarMerida Aguilar (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Marat SharipovSharipov (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Adolfo Daniel VallejoDaniel Vallejo – Facundo MenaMena (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Stefanos SakellaridisSakellaridis – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Petr BrunclikBrunclik (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Dominic StrickerStricker (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Alexander RitschardRitschard (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (7-67 6-4) – See score progression
- Jakub PaulPaul – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Mika BrunoldBrunold – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Henry BernetBernet – Murkel DellienDellien (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Kilian FeldbauschFeldbausch (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (5-7 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Alexander RitschardRitschard (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (7-6(7) 6-4) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Petr BrunclikBrunclik (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Marat SharipovSharipov (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Adolfo Daniel VallejoDaniel Vallejo – Facundo MenaMena (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Jakub PaulPaul – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Daniel Merida AguilarMerida Aguilar (7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Nerman FaticFatic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jakub PaulPaul – Calvin HemeryHemery (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Elias YmerYmer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
