James Kent Trotter and Patrick Kypson will square off in the 2nd round of the Granby Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Kypson who should win in 3 sets.
Patrick Kypson -> 1.52
James Kent Trotter -> 2.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head James Kent Trotter vs. Patrick Kypson
This will be the 3rd time that James Kent Trotter and Patrick Kypson fight against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Kent Trotter (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Kent Trotter won 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-3 in the qualifications in the Cary Challenger back in 2022.
James Kent Trotter
18 - 15win/loss
284
170
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-26 | 16-15 | 3-3 | 6-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-23 | 19-12 | 1-3 | 21-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-13 | 15-10 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-11 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 195, James reached the 2nd round after beating Nicolas Arseneault 2-6 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round against Arseneault, Kent Trotter recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-5 6-3). During the match, Kent Trotter scored 93 points vs Arseneault’s 91. James was pretty aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kent Trotter blasted 11 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. James Kent Trotter lost the serve 4 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Kent Trotter put 54% of his first serves in, winning 75% (38/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (20/44) on the 2nd serve. James broke Arseneault 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Kent Trotter has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (108-74). 9-7 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Kent Trotter has a composed61-41 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
Kent Trotter has an overall 18-15 win-loss record in 2025, 9-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Granby Challenger
Patrick Kypson
24 - 6win/loss
117
117
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 45-15 | 19-8 | 7-1 | 19-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-27 | 8-11 | 4-7 | 12-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 218, Kypson reached the 2nd round after beating Naoki Nakagawa 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Nakagawa (6-3 6-1). During the match Kypson scored 53 points vs Nakagawa’s 36. Patrick was quite aggressive to blast 20 winners.
About the serving games, Kypson bagged 6 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Patrick Kypson was extremely efficient on serve to win 83% (20/24) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Nakagawa 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Bogota Challenger where he defeated Pedro Sakamoto in the final 6-1 6-3 and the Little Rock Challenger where he defeated Michael Zheng in the final 6-1 1-6 7-5.
The American has a composed 24-6 win-loss record in 2025, 17-3 on hard (See FULL STATS)
.H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kent Trotter | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 16 |
| Pts | 93-91 | 53-36 |
| Total Points | 184 | 89 |
| Winners | 38 | 20 |
| %Winners | 41% | 38% |
Both Kent Trotter and Kypson played 1 match. At the moment, James Kent Trotter lost 1 set while Patrick Kypson hasn’t conceded a set so far. Kent Trotter has played 1 set more than Kypson (3 vs 2). Therefore, Kent Trotter played 13 games more than Kypson. The Japanese scored 38 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Patrick made 20 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kent Trotter | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 11 | 6 |
| 1st in | 51/95 | 24/43 |
| %1st in | 54% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 38/51 | 20/24 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 20/44 | 12/19 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 63% |
Kent Trotter made 11 aces . Kypson made 6 aces . Kent Trotter won 75% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Kypson won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kent Trotter | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 50% | 57% |
| Conceded | 11 | 0 |
| Saved | 7 | 0 |
| % Saved | 64% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 |
The Japanese broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Japanese conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded. Kypson broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Patrick was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Kent Trotter | |||
| R1 Arseneault | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 93-91 | 93-91 | |
| Total points | 184 | 184 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 51/95 | 51/95 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 38/51 | 38/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/44 | 20/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 7/11 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 64% | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Kypson | |||
| R1 Nakagawa | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 53-36 | 53-36 | |
| Total points | 89 | 89 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 24/43 | 24/43 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 20/24 | 20/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Granby Challenger
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marek GengelGengel – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kris Van WykVan Wyk – Liam DraxlDraxl (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-2) – H2H and prediction