Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Botic Van De Zandschulp will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Nordea Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.88
Camilo Ugo Carabelli -> 1.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
There is no head to head record between Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Botic Van De Zandschulp since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
26 - 18win/loss
49
43
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-29 | 5-9 | 27-14 | 1-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 58-30 | 6-5 | 52-24 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-26 | 0-2 | 41-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-24 | 3-4 | 36-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-24 | 4-2 | 39-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 59, the Argentine got to the 2nd round after beating Cristian Garin 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Ugo Carabelli had a good straight sets win against Garin (6-4 6-4). During the match, Ugo Carabelli scored 80 points vs Garin’s 74. Ugo Carabelli was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ugo Carabelli scored just 1 ace during the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Camilo Ugo Carabelli lost the serve 3 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Ugo Carabelli put 65% of his first serves in, winning 59% (27/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (12/25) on the 2nd serve. Camilo broke Garin 5 times after converting 36% of his break points (5/14).
Ugo Carabelli has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (372-216). 23-12 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ugo Carabelli has a composed 336-180 match record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Rosario Challenger where he defeated Hugo Dellien in the final 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Ugo Carabelli has a composed 26-18 win-loss record in 2025, 23-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Bastad
Botic Van De Zandschulp
14 - 18win/loss
77
22
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-32 | 13-11 | 11-10 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 100, Botic got to the 2nd round after beating Mikael Ymer 6-4 6-1.
In the 1st round, Van De Zandschulp had a good straight sets win against Ymer (6-4 6-1). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 58 points vs Ymer’s 36. Botic was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Van De Zandschulp couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Botic Van De Zandschulp was pretty effective on serve to win 79% (23/29) of his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Botic broke Ymer 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
The Dutch has a composed 14-18 win-loss record in 2025, 6-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Bastad
Botic has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ugo Carabelli | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 17 |
| Pts | 80-74 | 58-36 |
| Total Points | 154 | 94 |
| Winners | 27 | 23 |
| %Winners | 34% | 40% |
Both Ugo Carabelli and Van De Zandschulp played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Ugo Carabelli and Van De Zandschulp have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Ugo Carabelli played 3 games more than Van De Zandschulp. Camilo scored 27 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Van De Zandschulp scored 23 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ugo Carabelli | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 0 |
| 1st in | 46/71 | 29/45 |
| %1st in | 65% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 27/46 | 23/29 |
| %1st pts | 59% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 9/16 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 56% |
Ugo Carabelli fired 1 ace . Van De Zandschulp didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Ugo Carabelli won 59% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ugo Carabelli | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 36% | 50% |
| Conceded | 12 | 2 |
| Saved | 9 | 1 |
| % Saved | 75% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Camilo broke his opponent 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. Ugo Carabelli conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Van De Zandschulp broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Van De Zandschulp conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ugo Carabelli | |||
| R1 Garin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 80-74 | 80-74 | |
| Total points | 154 | 154 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 46/71 | 46/71 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 27/46 | 27/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 59% | 59% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 12/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 9/12 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Ymer | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 58-36 | 58-36 | |
| Total points | 94 | 94 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 29/45 | 29/45 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 23/29 | 23/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 9/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Bastad
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Vit KoprivaKopriva (7-63 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (4-6 7-66 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer (3-6 6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Luciano DarderiDarderi – Elias YmerYmer (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Mariano NavoneNavone (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian BaezBaez – (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (1-0) – H2H and prediction