Alexander Rozin and Kris Van Wyk will clash against each other in the 1st round of the Granby Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alexander Rozin who should win in 3 sets.
Alexander Rozin -> 1.666
Kris Van Wyk -> 2.11
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Alexander Rozin vs. Kris Van Wyk
This will be the 2nd time that Alexander Rozin and Kris Van Wyk face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Rozin (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Rozin won 6-4 6-3 in the 1st round in M25 Monastir back in June 2025.
Alexander Rozin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 15-5 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Alexander got to the 1st round after defeating Hyeon Chung 7-6(3) 6-3 and Yusuke Takahashi 7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(5).
In the qualifications, The Canadian defeated Takahashi (7-62 3-6 7-65).During the match, Rozin scored less points (2) than Takahashi. In fact, the world no. won 114 points vs Takahashi’s. That means that Rozin was more focused during the important points. Alexander was exceptionally aggressive to blast 56 winners.
Regarding the service games, Rozin fired 11 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Alexander Rozin lost the serve 3 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Rozin put 62% of his first serves in, winning 71% (56/79) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (24/49) on the 2nd serve. Alexander broke Takahashi once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Alexander started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to conquer 51% of the points he played.
Rozin has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 3 years having won 75% of his matches (18-6). 13-3 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Rozin has a compiled16-5 win-loss record in the last 3 years on hard.
Alexander has a compiled 15-4 win-loss record in 2025, 13-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Granby Challenger
Alexander has never competed in this tournament before.
Kris Van Wyk
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22-27 | 22-25 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 65-39 | 64-38 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 55-32 | 54-30 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 52-17 | 52-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 454, the South African reached the 1st round after defeating Karl Poling 6-3 6-2 and Masamichi Imamura 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, Kris had a good straight sets win against Imamura (6-1 6-2). During the match Van scored 56 points vs Imamura’s 29. Van was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Van fired 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Kris Van Wyk lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Van put 53% of his first serves in, winning 88% (22/25) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (11/22) on the 2nd serve. The South African broke Imamura 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kris started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to win 64% of the points he played.
The South African’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Sharm ElSheikh.
Kris has an overall 10-15 win-loss record in 2025, 10-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Rozin | Van |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 57 | 32 |
| Pts | 194-190 | 113-64 |
| Total Points | 384 | 177 |
| Winners | 89 | 40 |
| %Winners | 46% | 35% |
Both Rozin and Van played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Alexander Rozin lost 1 set while Kris Van Wyk hasn’t conceded a set so far. Rozin has played 1 set more than Van (5 vs 4). Therefore, Rozin played 25 games more than Van. Alexander scored 89 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Van managed to score 40 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Rozin | Van |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 14 | 14 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 7 |
| 1st in | 136/213 | 49/94 |
| %1st in | 64% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 89/136 | 40/49 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 41/77 | 27/45 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 60% |
Rozin recorded 14 aces (7 per match). Van recorded 14 aces (7 per match). Rozin won 65% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Van won 82% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Rozin | Van |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 9 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 9/14 |
| % Converted | 63% | 64% |
| Conceded | 22 | 3 |
| Saved | 17 | 1 |
| % Saved | 77% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 2 |
The Canadian broke his opponents 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The Canadian surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded. Van broke his opponents 9 times with a 64% conversion rate. The South African conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Rozin | ||||
| Q1 Chung | Q3 Takahashi | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-3 | 7-62 3-6 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 35 | 57 | |
| pts | 80-74 | 114-116 | 194-190 | |
| Total points | 154 | 230 | 384 | |
| Winners | 33 | 56 | 89 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 49% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 11 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 57/85 | 79/128 | 136/213 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 62% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 33/57 | 56/79 | 89/136 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 71% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/28 | 24/49 | 41/77 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 49% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 1/2 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 50% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 10 | 22 | |
| Saved | 10/12 | 7/10 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 70% | 77% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Van | ||||
| Q1 Poling | Q3 Imamura | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 15 | 32 | |
| pts | 57-35 | 56-29 | 113-64 | |
| Total points | 92 | 85 | 177 | |
| Winners | 18 | 22 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 39% | 35% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 9 | 5 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 24/47 | 25/47 | 49/94 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 53% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 22/25 | 40/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 88% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/23 | 11/22 | 27/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 50% | 60% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 5/7 | 9/14 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 71% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 50% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Granby Challenger
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Karue SellSell (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – James WattWatt (6-75 7-63 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-4 1-6 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tyler ZinkZink – Andres AndradeAndrade (3-6 7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Omar JasikaJasika – Justin BoulaisBoulais (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Liam DraxlDraxl (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – (1-0) – H2H and prediction