Marvin Moeller and Niels Visker will play each other in the qualifications of the Bunschoten Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on THE GRAND SLAM CLUB. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marvin Moeller who should win in 2 sets.
Marvin Moeller -> 1.21
Niels Visker -> 4.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Marvin Moeller vs. Niels Visker
There is no head to head record between Marvin Moeller and Niels Visker since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Marvin Moeller
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 43-25 | 1-2 | 29-16 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 25-18 | 0-0 | 13-13 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-27 | 2-1 | 36-16 | 20-8 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2022 | 18-7 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 16-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-26 | 1-5 | 12-9 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 6-4 |
Ranked no. 482, Marvin reached the qualifications after defeating Tom Paris 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, The German had a good straight sets win against Paris (6-3 6-1). During the match, Moeller scored 60 points vs Paris’s 40. Moeller was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Moeller recorded 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Marvin Moeller lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Moeller put 79% of his first serves in, winning 79% (27/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (3/9) on the 2nd serve. Marvin broke Paris 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Moeller has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 63% of his matches (214-126). 18-8 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Moeller has a composed103-65 record in the last 9 years on clay.
Marvin’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Oberhaching,M25 Brussels and M15 Amstelveen.
Moeller has a composed 28-13 win-loss record in 2025, 18-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bunschoten Challenger
Marvin has never competed in this tournament before.
Niels Visker
10 - 18win/loss
697
496
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-30 | 5-7 | 15-15 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2024 | 52-30 | 16-7 | 20-15 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2023 | 45-27 | 19-11 | 26-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 28-16 | 7-2 | 21-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 652, Visker reached the qualifications after beating Svyatoslav Gulin 6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-3.
In the qualifications against Gulin, Niels recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 7-63 6-3). During the match Visker scored 112 points vs Gulin’s 108. Visker was exceptionally aggressive to blast 51 winners.
About the serving games, Visker blasted 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Niels Visker was exceptionally effective on serve to win 76% (51/67) of his 1st serve and 53% (23/43) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Dutch broke Gulin 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Niels has a compiled 10-17 win-loss record in 2025, 8-9 on clay (See FULL STATS)
.H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Moeller | Visker |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 35 |
| Pts | 60-40 | 112-108 |
| Total Points | 100 | 220 |
| Winners | 27 | 51 |
| %Winners | 45% | 46% |
Both Moeller and Visker played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Niels Visker lost 1 set while Marvin Moeller hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Moeller has played 1 set(s) less than Visker (2 vs 3). Therefore, Moeller played 19 games less than Visker. The German scored 27 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Niels bagged 51 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Moeller | Visker |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 7 |
| 1st in | 34/43 | 67/110 |
| %1st in | 79% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 27/34 | 51/67 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 3/9 | 23/43 |
| %2nd pts | 33% | 53% |
Moeller managed to score 2 aces . Visker managed to score 7 aces . Moeller won 79% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 33% of the points. On the other side, Visker won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Moeller | Visker |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 71% | 43% |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 |
| Saved | 1 | 5 |
| % Saved | 50% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Marvin broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Marvin conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Visker conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Moeller | |||
| Q1 Paris | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 60-40 | 60-40 | |
| Total points | 100 | 100 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 34/43 | 34/43 | |
| % 1st in | 79% | 79% | |
| 1st pts | 27/34 | 27/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Visker | |||
| Q1 Gulin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-74 7-63 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 112-108 | 112-108 | |
| Total points | 220 | 220 | |
| Winners | 51 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 67/110 | 67/110 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 51/67 | 51/67 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/43 | 23/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Ivan GakhovGakhov (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jelle SelsSels – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Clement TaburTabur (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathys ErhardErhard – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan NijboerNijboer – Nicolas KickerKicker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martin KrumichKrumich – (0-0) – H2H and prediction