Jack Pinnington Jones and Kyle Edmund will play each other in the final of the Nottingham 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 12:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Pinnington Jones who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jack Pinnington Jones is the pick to win this match.
Jack Pinnington Jones -> 1.59
Kyle Edmund -> 2.24
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jack Pinnington Jones vs. Kyle Edmund
There is no head to head record between Jack Pinnington Jones and Kyle Edmund since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Jack Pinnington Jones
14 - 9win/loss
204
177
LLWLWLWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24-15 | 9-5 | 2-1 | 2-4 | 11-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 29-12 | 21-8 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-8 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-12 | 9-7 | 8-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-13 | 6-5 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 281 (career-high), the Brit reached the final after beating Nicolai Budkov Kjaer 6-3 6-2, Harry Wendelken 6-4 4-6 6-3, Edward Winter 6-7(6) 6-3 6-4 and Oliver Crawford 6-4 6-4.
In the semifinal, Pinnington Jones had a good straight sets win against Crawford (6-4 6-4). During the match, Pinnington Jones scored 62 points vs Crawford’s 58. Jack was pretty aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Pinnington Jones managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Jack Pinnington Jones lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Pinnington Jones put 80% of his first serves in, winning 70% (37/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (7/13) on the 2nd serve. Pinnington Jones broke Crawford 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Brit has dropped 2 set in this tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Pinnington Jones has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 64% of his matches (94-54). 10-5 on grass in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Pinnington Jones has a composed17-10 record in the last 6 years on grass.
Pinnington Jones’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Ilkley Challenger.
Pinnington Jones has an overall 14-9 win-loss record in 2025, 10-5 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 3 Challenger
Kyle Edmund
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-25 | 8-7 | 4-5 | 25-11 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 14-16 | 1-7 | 7-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 471, Kyle got to the final after beating Tom Hands 6-4 6-4, Liam Broady 7-6(1) 6-2, Patrick Zahraj 7-6(4) 4-3 ret. and Hamish Stewart 6-1 6-4.
In the semifinal, Edmund had a good straight sets win against Stewart (6-1 6-4). During the match Edmund scored 63 points vs Stewart’s 39. Edmund was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Edmund made 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Kyle Edmund was quite efficient on serve to win 88% (28/32) of his 1st serve and 80% (8/10) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brit broke Stewart 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kyle hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 59% of the points he played.
Kyle’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Reggio Emilia.
The Brit has a composed 10-7 win-loss record in 2025, 5-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pinnington Jones | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 10 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 98 | 78 |
| Pts | 334-298 | 285-211 |
| Total Points | 632 | 496 |
| Winners | 151 | 113 |
| %Winners | 45% | 40% |
Both Pinnington Jones and Edmund played 4 matches. At the moment, Jack Pinnington Jones surrendered 2 sets while Kyle Edmund hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Pinnington Jones has played 1 set more than Edmund (10 vs 9). Therefore, Pinnington Jones played 20 games more than Edmund. Jack scored 151 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit recorded 113 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pinnington Jones | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 21 | 26 |
| Avg per match | 5.3 | 6.5 |
| 1st in | 206/327 | 138/210 |
| %1st in | 63% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 151/206 | 113/138 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 60/121 | 43/72 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 60% |
Pinnington Jones blasted 21 aces (5.3 per match). Edmund bagged 26 aces (6.5 per match). Pinnington Jones won 73% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Edmund won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pinnington Jones | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 16 | 12 |
| Converted | 16/30 | 12/35 |
| % Converted | 53% | 34% |
| Conceded | 24 | 8 |
| Saved | 17 | 4 |
| % Saved | 71% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 4 |
Jack broke his opponents 16 times with a 53% conversion rate. Jack surrendered his serve 7 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Edmund broke his opponents 12 times with a 34% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Pinnington Jones | ||||||
| R1 Budkov Kjaer |
R2 Wendelken |
1/4 Winter |
1/2 Crawford |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | 6-76 6-3 6-4 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 29 | 32 | 20 | 98 | |
| pts | 66-52 | 101-94 | 105-94 | 62-58 | 334-298 | |
| Total points | 118 | 195 | 199 | 120 | 632 | |
| Winners | 27 | 39 | 48 | 37 | 151 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 39% | 46% | 60% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 20 | |
| 1st in | 34/58 | 59/103 | 60/100 | 53/66 | 206/327 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 57% | 60% | 80% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 27/34 | 39/59 | 48/60 | 37/53 | 151/206 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 66% | 80% | 70% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/24 | 22/44 | 22/40 | 7/13 | 60/121 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 50% | 55% | 54% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 16 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/11 | 3/8 | 3/5 | 16/30 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 45% | 38% | 60% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 24 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 6/10 | 4/5 | 2/3 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 60% | 80% | 67% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |
| Edmund | ||||||
| R1 Hands |
R2 Broady |
1/4 Zahraj |
1/2 Stewart |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 7-61 6-2 | 7-64 4-3 ret. | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 21 | 20 | 17 | 78 | |
| pts | 73-53 | 81-59 | 68-60 | 63-39 | 285-211 | |
| Total points | 126 | 140 | 128 | 102 | 496 | |
| Winners | 26 | 30 | 29 | 28 | 113 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 37% | 43% | 44% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 7 | 11 | 5 | 26 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 31/50 | 39/65 | 36/53 | 32/42 | 138/210 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 60% | 68% | 76% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 26/31 | 30/39 | 29/36 | 28/32 | 113/138 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 77% | 81% | 88% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 17/26 | 9/17 | 8/10 | 43/72 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 65% | 53% | 80% | 60% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 12 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 3/9 | 2/9 | 3/6 | 12/35 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 33% | 22% | 50% | 34% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 8 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 4/5 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 80% | 0% | – | 20% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWWWW
LWWWWLWLLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
