Kyle Edmund and Hamish Stewart will fight against each other in the semifinal of the Nottingham 3 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 4:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kyle Edmund who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kyle Edmund is the pick to win this match.
Kyle Edmund -> 1.55
Hamish Stewart -> 2.33
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Kyle Edmund vs. Hamish Stewart
This will be the 2nd time that Kyle Edmund and Hamish Stewart play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Edmund (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they fought against each other, Edmund won 7-5 3-6 6-3 in the final in M25 Sunderland back in 2024.
Kyle Edmund
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-25 | 8-7 | 4-5 | 25-11 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 14-16 | 1-7 | 7-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 471, Edmund reached the semifinal after beating Tom Hands 6-4 6-4, Liam Broady 7-6(1) 6-2 and Patrick Zahraj 7-6(4) 4-3 ret..
In the quarter against Zahraj, Edmund had a free pass after Zahraj retired on a 7-64 4-3 . scoreline.
Edmund has positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (214-160). 4-2 on grass in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Edmund has a composed 16-16 match record in the last years on grass.
The Brit’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Reggio Emilia.
Kyle has an overall 9-7 win-loss record in 2025, 4-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 3 Challenger
Hamish Stewart
36 - 18win/loss
451
448
LWWLWWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-20 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 16-6 | 5-3 | 7-2 |
| 2024 | 26-20 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 17-10 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-21 | 23-13 | 0-0 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 20-7 | 14-5 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 545, Stewart got to the semifinal after defeating Matthew Summers 7-6(2) 6-4, George Loffhagen 6-3 6-4 and Ryan Peniston 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4.
In the quarter against Peniston, Hamish recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-65 6-4). During the match Stewart and Peniston scored the same amount of points (97). However, the world no. 471 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The Brit was quite aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about serving, Stewart scored 10 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Hamish Stewart lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Stewart put 56% of his first serves in, winning 83% (45/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (19/43) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Peniston 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Hamish has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Stewart’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Cadolzburg,M15 Bucharest,M15 Poitiers and M15 Sharm ElSheikh.
Stewart has an overall 36-17 win-loss record in 2025, 5-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Edmund | Stewart |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 61 | 74 |
| Pts | 222-172 | 242-211 |
| Total Points | 394 | 453 |
| Winners | 85 | 108 |
| %Winners | 38% | 45% |
Both Edmund and Stewart played 3 matches. At the moment, Hamish Stewart surrendered 1 set while Kyle Edmund hasn’t conceded a set so far. Talking about their workload, Edmund and Stewart have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Edmund played 13 games less than Stewart. Kyle scored 85 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Hamish managed to score 108 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Edmund | Stewart |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 21 | 29 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 9.7 |
| 1st in | 106/168 | 129/216 |
| %1st in | 63% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 85/106 | 108/129 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 35/62 | 47/87 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 54% |
Edmund made 21 aces (7 per match). Stewart fired 29 aces (9.7 per match). Edmund won 80% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Stewart won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Edmund | Stewart |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 6 |
| Converted | 9/29 | 6/15 |
| % Converted | 31% | 40% |
| Conceded | 8 | 7 |
| Saved | 4 | 4 |
| % Saved | 50% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
The Brit broke his opponents 9 times with a 31% conversion rate. Edmund conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Stewart broke his opponents 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. Stewart conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Edmund | |||||
| R1 Hands |
R2 Broady |
1/4 Zahraj |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 7-61 6-2 | 7-64 4-3 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 21 | 20 | 61 | |
| pts | 73-53 | 81-59 | 68-60 | 222-172 | |
| Total points | 126 | 140 | 128 | 394 | |
| Winners | 26 | 30 | 29 | 85 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 37% | 43% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 7 | 11 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 31/50 | 39/65 | 36/53 | 106/168 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 60% | 68% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 26/31 | 30/39 | 29/36 | 85/106 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 77% | 81% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 17/26 | 9/17 | 35/62 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 65% | 53% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 3/9 | 2/9 | 9/29 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 33% | 22% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 | 1 | 8 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 4/5 | 0/1 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 80% | 0% | 27% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
| Stewart | |||||
| R1 Summers |
R2 Loffhagen |
1/4 Peniston |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | 3-6 7-65 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 19 | 32 | 74 | |
| pts | 78-64 | 67-50 | 97-97 | 242-211 | |
| Total points | 142 | 117 | 194 | 453 | |
| Winners | 34 | 29 | 45 | 108 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 43% | 46% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 10 | 10 | 29 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 2 | 6 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 40/63 | 35/56 | 54/97 | 129/216 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | 56% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 34/40 | 29/35 | 45/54 | 108/129 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 83% | 83% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 14/21 | 19/43 | 47/87 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 67% | 44% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 1/7 | 2/2 | 3/6 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 14% | 100% | 50% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 57% | 19% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLWLLL
LWWLWWWLWW Tennis Scores in Nottingham 3 Challenger
- Charles Broom/Mark WhitehouseBroom/Mark Whitehouse – Tom Hands/Harry WendelkenHands/Harry Wendelken (7-65 5-7 10-6) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Hamish StewartStewart (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
