Patrick Zahraj and Kyle Edmund will face off in the quarter of the Nottingham 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kyle Edmund who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kyle Edmund is the pick to win this match.
Kyle Edmund -> 1.85
Patrick Zahraj -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Patrick Zahraj vs. Kyle Edmund
There is no head to head record between Patrick Zahraj and Kyle Edmund since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Patrick Zahraj
26 - 20win/loss
271
271
LLWLWWWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-23 | 0-1 | 5-10 | 17-8 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-31 | 9-5 | 17-15 | 14-9 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2023 | 28-16 | 4-3 | 15-10 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2022 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 280, Zahraj reached the quarter after beating William Jansen 6-4 6-2, Dylan Dietrich 6-4 6-1, Axel Nefve 6-4 6-4 and Kenny de Schepper 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Patrick had a good straight sets win against de Schepper (6-3 6-2). During the match, Zahraj scored 58 points vs de Schepper’s 39. Zahraj was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Zahraj scored 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Patrick Zahraj conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 67% of his first serves in, win 91% (29/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (8/16) on the 2nd serve. The German broke de Schepper 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Zahraj started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to conquer 59% of the points he played.
Zahraj has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 58% of his matches (134-99). 5-3 on grass in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Zahraj has an aggregate5-3 win-loss record in the last 8 years on grass.
Patrick’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Pau Challenger.
Zahraj has an aggregate 26-20 win-loss record in 2025, 5-3 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 3 Challenger
Zahraj has never competed in this tournament before.
Kyle Edmund
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-25 | 8-7 | 4-5 | 25-11 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 14-16 | 1-7 | 7-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 471, the Brit reached the quarter after defeating Tom Hands 6-4 6-4 and Liam Broady 7-6(1) 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Kyle had a good straight sets win against Broady (7-61 6-2). During the match Edmund scored 81 points vs Broady’s 59. Kyle was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Edmund fired 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Kyle Edmund was pretty effective on serve to win 77% (30/39) of his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Kyle broke Broady 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Brit hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 58% of the points he played.
The Brit’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Reggio Emilia.
Edmund has an aggregate 8-7 win-loss record in 2025, 3-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zahraj | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 72 | 41 |
| Pts | 258-181 | 154-112 |
| Total Points | 439 | 266 |
| Winners | 94 | 56 |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% |
Zahraj played 4 matches while Edmund competed in 2 matches. Zahraj started his run from the qualifications while Edmund had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Zahraj has played 4 sets more than Edmund (8 vs 4). Therefore, Zahraj played 31 games more than Edmund. Patrick scored 94 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Kyle blasted 56 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zahraj | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 20 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 5 |
| 1st in | 116/201 | 70/115 |
| %1st in | 58% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 94/116 | 56/70 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 50/85 | 26/45 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 58% |
Zahraj recorded 20 aces (5 per match). Edmund made 10 aces (5 per match). Zahraj won 81% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Edmund won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zahraj | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 16 | 7 |
| Converted | 16/34 | 7/20 |
| % Converted | 47% | 35% |
| Conceded | 10 | 7 |
| Saved | 6 | 4 |
| % Saved | 60% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
Patrick broke his opponents 16 times with a 47% conversion rate. Zahraj surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Kyle broke his opponents 7 times with a 35% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Zahraj | ||||||
| Q1 Jansen |
Q3 Dietrich |
R1 Nefve |
R2 de Schepper |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 6-1 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 | 20 | 17 | 72 | |
| pts | 62-43 | 66-43 | 72-56 | 58-39 | 258-181 | |
| Total points | 105 | 109 | 128 | 97 | 439 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | 29 | 29 | 94 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 27% | 40% | 50% | 36% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 18/43 | 27/44 | 39/66 | 32/48 | 116/201 | |
| % 1st in | 42% | 61% | 59% | 67% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 18/18 | 18/27 | 29/39 | 29/32 | 94/116 | |
| % 1st pts | 100% | 67% | 74% | 91% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/25 | 11/17 | 13/27 | 8/16 | 50/85 | |
| % 2nd pts | 72% | 65% | 48% | 50% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 16 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 6/12 | 4/7 | 3/6 | 16/34 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 50% | 57% | 50% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 0/0 | 6 | |
| Saved % | – | 60% | 60% | – | 30% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | |
| Edmund | ||||||
| R1 Hands |
R2 Broady |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 7-61 6-2 | ||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||
| Tot Games | 20 | 21 | 41 | |||
| pts | 73-53 | 81-59 | 154-112 | |||
| Total points | 126 | 140 | 266 | |||
| Winners | 26 | 30 | 56 | |||
| %Winners | 36% | 37% | 36% | |||
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 7 | 10 | |||
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | |||
| 1st in | 31/50 | 39/65 | 70/115 | |||
| % 1st in | 62% | 60% | 61% | |||
| 1st pts | 26/31 | 30/39 | 56/70 | |||
| % 1st pts | 84% | 77% | 80% | |||
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 17/26 | 26/45 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 65% | 58% | |||
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |||
| Converted | 4/11 | 3/9 | 7/20 | |||
| Converted % | 36% | 33% | 35% | |||
| Conceded | 2 | 5 | 7 | |||
| Saved | 0/2 | 4/5 | 4 | |||
| Saved % | 0% | 80% | 20% | |||
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWWWLL
LWWWWLWLLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Hamish StewartStewart (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alastair GrayGray – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (0-0) – H2H and prediction
