Federico Cina and Maxim Mrva will square off in the 2nd round of the Trieste Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Cina who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Federico Cina is the pick to win this match.
Federico Cina -> 1.56
Maxim Mrva -> 2.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Federico Cina vs. Maxim Mrva
There is no head to head record between Federico Cina and Maxim Mrva since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Federico Cina
21 - 9win/loss
202
202
LWLLWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-16 | 17-6 | 10-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-23 | 18-15 | 13-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 279 (career-high), the Italian got to the 2nd round after beating Juan Pablo Ficovich 6-7(5) 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round against Pablo Ficovich, The Italian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 7-5 6-3). During the match, Cina scored 116 points vs Pablo Ficovich’s 103. Cina was extremely aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Regarding the service games, Cina made 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Federico Cina lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Cina put 58% of his first serves in, winning 80% (51/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (21/46) on the 2nd serve. Federico broke Pablo Ficovich 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Cina has a solid record in the last 4 years having won 60% of his matches (54-36). 7-6 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Cina has an aggregate21-17 win-loss record in the last 4 years on clay.
Cina’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh,the Hersonissos 2 Challenger and the Tbilisi Challenger.
Cina has a composed 21-9 win-loss record in 2025, 7-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Trieste Challenger
The Italian has never competed in this tournament before.
Maxim Mrva
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-20 | 8-3 | 19-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 10-8 | 2-3 | 8-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 501 (career-high), Mrva reached the 2nd round after beating Moez Echargui 7-5 1-6 7-6(7), Lukas Pokorny 6-2 6-3 and Nikoloz Basilashvili 3-6 6-2 6-0.
In the 1st round against Basilashvili, Maxim recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-2 6-0). During the match Mrva scored 78 points vs Basilashvili’s 55. The Czech was exceptionally aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Mrva recorded 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Maxim Mrva lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Mrva put 57% of his first serves in, winning 66% (23/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (16/26) on the 2nd serve. Maxim broke Basilashvili 7 times after converting 70% of his break points (7/10).
Mrva’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Monastir.
The Czech has an overall 23-13 win-loss record in 2025, 14-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cina | Mrva |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 34 | 72 |
| Pts | 116-103 | 255-213 |
| Total Points | 219 | 468 |
| Winners | 51 | 71 |
| %Winners | 44% | 28% |
Cina played 1 match while Mrva competed in 3 matches. Mrva started his run from the qualifications while Cina had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Federico Cina lost 1 set, while Maxim Mrva lost 2 sets. Cina has played 5 set(s) less than Mrva (3 vs 8). Therefore, Cina played 38 games less than Mrva. Federico scored 51 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Mrva blasted 71 winners (28%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cina | Mrva |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2.7 |
| 1st in | 64/110 | 105/201 |
| %1st in | 58% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 51/64 | 71/105 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 21/46 | 54/96 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 56% |
Cina scored 2 aces . Mrva bagged 8 aces (2.7 per match). Cina won 80% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Mrva won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cina | Mrva |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 18 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 18/39 |
| % Converted | 45% | 46% |
| Conceded | 8 | 17 |
| Saved | 5 | 6 |
| % Saved | 63% | 35% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 11 |
Federico broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Federico surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. The Czech broke his opponents 18 times with a 46% conversion rate. Mrva conceded his serve 11 times and he saved 35% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cina | |||
| R1 Pablo Ficovich |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
| pts | 116-103 | 116-103 | |
| Total points | 219 | 219 | |
| Winners | 51 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 64/110 | 64/110 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 51/64 | 51/64 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/46 | 21/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Mrva | |||||
| Q1 Echargui |
Q3 Pokorny |
R1 Basilashvili |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 1-6 7-67 | 6-2 6-3 | 3-6 6-2 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 17 | 23 | 72 | |
| pts | 109-111 | 68-47 | 78-55 | 255-213 | |
| Total points | 220 | 115 | 133 | 468 | |
| Winners | 31 | 17 | 23 | 71 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 25% | 29% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 1 | 4 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 47/96 | 23/44 | 35/61 | 105/201 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 52% | 57% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 31/47 | 17/23 | 23/35 | 71/105 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 74% | 66% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/49 | 12/21 | 16/26 | 54/96 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 57% | 62% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 7 | 18 | |
| Converted | 5/15 | 6/14 | 7/10 | 18/39 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 43% | 70% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 3 | 4 | 17 | |
| Saved | 4/10 | 1/3 | 1/4 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 33% | 25% | 98% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 2 | 3 | 11 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWLWWLW
LLWWLLLLWW Tennis Scores in Trieste Challenger
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Tristan BoyerBoyer (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Henrique RochaRocha (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Maxim MrvaMrva – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (3-6 6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Matej DodigDodig – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Andrea PicchionePicchione (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Matteo GiganteGigante (7-5 7-64) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-1 2-6 7-65) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Jerome KymKym (4-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Arthur GeaGea (6-4 6-72 6-2) – See score progression
- Federico CinaCina – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-75 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Vilius GaubasGaubas (6-74 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Facundo MenaMena (7-61 6-0) – See score progression
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-1 2-6 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Maxim MrvaMrva – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (3-6 6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Tristan BoyerBoyer (7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Henrique RochaRocha (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sumit NagalNagal – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
