Mariano Navone and Botic Van De Zandschulp will face off in the quarter of the Braunschweig Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on BRAWO CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mariano Navone who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mariano Navone is the pick to win this match.
Mariano Navone -> 1.73
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 2.01
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mariano Navone vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
There is no head to head record between Mariano Navone and Botic Van De Zandschulp since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Mariano Navone
21 - 19win/loss
72
29
LWWLWWWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 38-31 | 5-12 | 30-16 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 30-28 | 2-7 | 27-14 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 40-21 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-25 | 0-1 | 44-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-24 | 0-0 | 40-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 91, Navone got to the quarter after beating Ignacio Buse 7-5 6-2 and Diego Dedura 6-1 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Mariano had a good straight sets win against Dedura (6-1 6-2). During the match, Navone scored 62 points vs Dedura’s 36. The Argentine was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Navone was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault. Mariano Navone lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Navone put 73% of his first serves in, winning 69% (22/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 67% (8/12) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Dedura 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mariano hasn’t lost yet a set in this tournament to win 59% of the points he played.
Navone has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 61% of his matches (241-151). 16-11 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Navone has an overall229-124 record in the last 8 years on clay.
Mariano has a composed 21-19 win-loss record in 2025, 16-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Braunschweig Challenger
Mariano has never competed in this tournament before.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
13 - 17win/loss
77
22
LLWLWLWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-32 | 13-11 | 11-10 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 92, the Dutch got to the quarter after defeating Jan Choinski 6-1 6-0 and David Jorda Sanchis 6-1 6-1.
In the 2nd round, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Jorda Sanchis (6-1 6-1). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 62 points vs Jorda Sanchis’s 37. Van De Zandschulp was very aggressive to blast 18 winners.
About the serving games, Van De Zandschulp was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 53% of his first serves in, winning 72% (18/25) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (11/22) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Jorda Sanchis 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Dutch hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 65% of the points he played.
Van De Zandschulp has an overall 13-17 win-loss record in 2025, 5-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Braunschweig Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Navone | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 35 | 27 |
| Pts | 134-92 | 118-63 |
| Total Points | 226 | 181 |
| Winners | 49 | 40 |
| %Winners | 37% | 34% |
Both Navone and Van De Zandschulp played 2 matches. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Navone and Van De Zandschulp have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Navone played 8 games more than Van De Zandschulp. The Argentine scored 49 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch struck 40 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Navone | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 2 |
| 1st in | 68/103 | 50/91 |
| %1st in | 66% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 49/68 | 40/50 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 20/35 | 20/41 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 49% |
Navone didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Van De Zandschulp blasted 4 aces (2 per match). Navone won 72% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Navone | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 11 |
| Converted | 11/22 | 11/21 |
| % Converted | 50% | 52% |
| Conceded | 8 | 2 |
| Saved | 5 | 1 |
| % Saved | 63% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Mariano broke his opponents 11 times with a 50% conversion rate. Navone dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Van De Zandschulp broke his opponents 11 times with a 52% conversion rate. Van De Zandschulp conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Navone | ||||
| R1 Buse |
R2 Dedura |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 15 | 35 | |
| pts | 72-56 | 62-36 | 134-92 | |
| Total points | 128 | 98 | 226 | |
| Winners | 27 | 22 | 49 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 35% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 36/59 | 32/44 | 68/103 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 73% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 27/36 | 22/32 | 49/68 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 69% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 8/12 | 20/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 67% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 6/10 | 11/22 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 60% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 2/3 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 67% | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | ||||
| R1 Choinski |
R2 Jorda Sanchis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 14 | 27 | |
| pts | 56-26 | 62-37 | 118-63 | |
| Total points | 82 | 99 | 181 | |
| Winners | 22 | 18 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 29% | 34% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 25/44 | 25/47 | 50/91 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 53% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 22/25 | 18/25 | 40/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 72% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 11/22 | 20/41 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 50% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 6/11 | 11/21 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 55% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | – | 50% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWWWWL
LLWLWLWLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Filip MisolicMisolic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
