Kyle Edmund and Liam Broady will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Nottingham 3 Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kyle Edmund who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kyle Edmund is the pick to win this match.
Kyle Edmund -> 1.76
Liam Broady -> 1.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Kyle Edmund vs. Liam Broady
This will be the 3rd time that Kyle Edmund and Liam Broady square off. The head to head is 1-1 for Edmund and Broady (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they competed against each other, Edmund won 7-6(5) 7-6(3) in the quarter in M25 Reggio Emilia back in May 2025.
Kyle Edmund
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-25 | 8-7 | 4-5 | 25-11 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 14-16 | 1-7 | 7-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 471, Kyle reached the 2nd round after beating Tom Hands 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Edmund had a good straight sets win against Hands (6-4 6-4). During the match, Edmund scored 73 points vs Hands’s 53. The Brit was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Edmund blasted 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Kyle Edmund lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Edmund put 62% of his first serves in, winning 84% (26/31) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (9/19) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Hands 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Edmund has positive match record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (212-160). 2-2 on grass in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Edmund has an overall 14-16 record in the last years on grass.
The Brit’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Reggio Emilia.
The Brit has an overall 7-7 win-loss record in 2025, 2-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 3 Challenger
Liam Broady
28 - 14win/loss
533
93
LWLWLLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-15 | 13-7 | 10-4 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 10-18 | 8-13 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-28 | 23-9 | 2-4 | 15-9 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-25 | 16-9 | 2-5 | 10-5 | 8-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-26 | 19-10 | 7-5 | 16-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 557, Liam reached the 2nd round after defeating Hugo Grenier 7-6(5) 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Grenier (7-65 6-4). During the match Broady scored 73 points vs Grenier’s 62. The Brit was quite aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Broady struck 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Liam Broady was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 83% (34/41) of his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Liam broke Grenier twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Liam’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Foggia.
The Brit has a composed 28-14 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Edmund | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 23 |
| Pts | 73-53 | 73-62 |
| Total Points | 126 | 135 |
| Winners | 26 | 34 |
| %Winners | 36% | 47% |
Both Edmund and Broady played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Edmund and Broady have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Edmund played 3 games less than Broady. Edmund scored 26 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit scored 34 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Edmund | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 31/50 | 41/64 |
| %1st in | 62% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 26/31 | 34/41 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 13/23 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 57% |
Edmund scored 3 aces . Broady struck 3 aces . Edmund won 84% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Broady won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Edmund | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/11 | 2/4 |
| % Converted | 36% | 50% |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
The Brit broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Edmund conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Edmund | |||
| R1 Hands |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 73-53 | 73-53 | |
| Total points | 126 | 126 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/50 | 31/50 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 26/31 | 26/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 9/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Broady | |||
| R1 Grenier |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 73-62 | 73-62 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 41/64 | 41/64 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 34/41 | 34/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLWLLL
LWLWLLLLWW Tennis Scores in Nottingham 3 Challenger
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Harry WendelkenWendelken (6-4 4-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hamish StewartStewart – George LoffhagenLoffhagen (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Henry SearleSearle (4-6 6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Edward WinterWinter – Connor ThomsonThomson (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Liam BroadyBroady – Kyle EdmundEdmund (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ilya IvashkaIvashka – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alastair GrayGray – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
