Eliot Spizzirri and Aidan Mayo will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Newport Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Eliot Spizzirri who should win in 3 sets.
Eliot Spizzirri -> 1.51
Aidan Mayo -> 2.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Eliot Spizzirri vs. Aidan Mayo
There is no head to head record between Eliot Spizzirri and Aidan Mayo since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Eliot Spizzirri
25 - 19win/loss
90
87
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 56-31 | 27-14 | 7-6 | 17-5 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-17 | 28-11 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 9-10 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-4 | 15-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 128, Spizzirri got to the 2nd round after defeating Evan Zhu 7-5 6-2.
In the 1st round, Spizzirri had a good straight sets win against Zhu (7-5 6-2). During the match, Spizzirri scored 67 points vs Zhu’s 46. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Spizzirri recorded 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Eliot Spizzirri lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Spizzirri put 75% of his first serves in, winning 73% (30/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 36% (5/14) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Zhu 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Spizzirri has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 60% of his matches (88-59). 3-5 on grass in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Spizzirri has a composed4-7 match record in the last 5 years on grass.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the San Diego Challenger where he defeated Mackenzie Mcdonald in the final 6-4 2-6 6-4.
Eliot has an overall 24-19 win-loss record in 2025, 3-5 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Newport Challenger
Spizzirri has never competed in this tournament before.
Aidan Mayo
12 - 17win/loss
548
269
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 17-22 | 16-12 | 0-4 | 0-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-32 | 16-18 | 4-4 | 7-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-28 | 24-15 | 2-5 | 20-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-25 | 27-19 | 4-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-8 | 9-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 299, the American reached the 2nd round after beating Dan Martin 7-5 4-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, The American defeated Martin (7-5 4-6 6-3). During the match Mayo scored 99 points vs Martin’s 92. Aidan was exceptionally aggressive to blast 41 winners.
About the serving games, Mayo recorded 10 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Aidan Mayo lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Mayo put 56% of his first serves in, winning 82% (41/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (19/40) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Martin 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Aidan has an aggregate 12-16 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Spizzirri | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 31 |
| Pts | 67-46 | 99-92 |
| Total Points | 113 | 191 |
| Winners | 30 | 41 |
| %Winners | 45% | 41% |
Both Spizzirri and Mayo played 1 match. At the moment, Aidan Mayo surrendered 1 set while Eliot Spizzirri hasn’t conceded a set so far. Spizzirri has played 1 set(s) less than Mayo (2 vs 3). Therefore, Spizzirri played 11 games less than Mayo. Eliot scored 30 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Aidan struck 41 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Spizzirri | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 10 |
| 1st in | 41/55 | 50/90 |
| %1st in | 75% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 30/41 | 41/50 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 5/14 | 19/40 |
| %2nd pts | 36% | 48% |
Spizzirri fired 10 aces . Mayo managed to score 10 aces . Spizzirri won 73% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 36% of the points. On the other side, Mayo won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Spizzirri | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 4/11 |
| % Converted | 83% | 36% |
| Conceded | 3 | 8 |
| Saved | 1 | 6 |
| % Saved | 33% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The American broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. The American lost his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Mayo conceded his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Spizzirri | |||
| R1 Zhu | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 67-46 | 67-46 | |
| Total points | 113 | 113 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 41/55 | 41/55 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 30/41 | 30/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Mayo | |||
| R1 Martin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 99-92 | 99-92 | |
| Total points | 191 | 191 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 50/90 | 50/90 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 41/50 | 41/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/40 | 19/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Newport Challenger
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Patrick KypsonKypson (7-61 7-5) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Murphy CassoneCassone (7-63 7-61) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Alex BoltBolt (7-64 7-62) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Michael ZhengZheng (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Tyler ZinkZink – Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Michael ZhengZheng (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- James WattWatt – Tristan MccormickMccormick (7-65 7-64) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Omar JasikaJasika (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Daniel MilavskyMilavsky (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Dan MartinMartin (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – James DuckworthDuckworth (6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Stefan KozlovKozlov (6-1 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Evan ZhuZhu (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Murphy CassoneCassone (7-6(3) 7-6(1)) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Omar JasikaJasika (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Alex BoltBolt (7-6(4) 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Daniel MilavskyMilavsky (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Michael ZhengZheng (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Tyler ZinkZink – Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Patrick KypsonKypson (7-6(1) 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Bernard TomicTomic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karl PolingPoling – Oscar WeightmanWeightman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – (2-5) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (0-0) – H2H and prediction