Botic Van De Zandschulp and David Jorda Sanchis will square off in the 2nd round of the Braunschweig Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3:30 pm on BRAWO CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.106
David Jorda Sanchis -> 5.85
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. David Jorda Sanchis
There is no head to head record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and David Jorda Sanchis since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
12 - 17win/loss
92
22
LWWLWWWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19-21 | 7-6 | 11-10 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 92, the Dutch reached the 2nd round after defeating Jan Choinski 6-1 6-0.
In the 1st round, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Choinski (6-1 6-0). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 56 points vs Choinski’s 26. The Dutch was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van De Zandschulp scored 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 57% of his first serves in, win 88% (22/25) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (9/19) on the 2nd serve. Botic broke Choinski 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Van De Zandschulp has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (335-213). 4-6 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Van De Zandschulp has a compiled 141-89 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The Dutch has an aggregate 12-17 win-loss record in 2025, 4-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Braunschweig Challenger
David Jorda Sanchis
16 - 18win/loss
496
292
WLWWLWWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19-20 | 0-1 | 18-14 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 25-29 | 6-4 | 14-18 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-35 | 8-7 | 25-19 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-19 | 14-4 | 20-14 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 513, Jorda Sanchis got to the 2nd round after beating Geoffrey Blancaneaux 4-6 7-5 6-3, Orlando Luz 6-3 6-4 and Justin Engel 6-2 7-6(7).
In the 1st round, Jorda Sanchis had a good straight sets win against Engel (6-2 7-67). During the match Jorda Sanchis scored 65 points vs Engel’s 61. David was exceptionally aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Jorda Sanchis blasted 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. David Jorda Sanchis was exceptionally effective on serve to win 80% (35/44) of his 1st serve and 56% (14/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jorda Sanchis broke Engel twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
David’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Oegstgeest.
The Spaniard has a compiled 16-18 win-loss record in 2025, 15-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Braunschweig Challenger
The Spaniard has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Jorda Sanchis |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 71 |
| Pts | 56-26 | 236-220 |
| Total Points | 82 | 456 |
| Winners | 22 | 109 |
| %Winners | 39% | 46% |
Van De Zandschulp played 1 match while Jorda Sanchis competed in 3 matches. Jorda Sanchis started his run from the qualifications while Van De Zandschulp had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, David Jorda Sanchis lost 1 set while Botic Van De Zandschulp hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Van De Zandschulp has played 5 set(s) less than Jorda Sanchis (2 vs 7). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 58 games less than Jorda Sanchis. Botic scored 22 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Spaniard made 109 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Jorda Sanchis |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 14 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 4.7 |
| 1st in | 25/44 | 143/234 |
| %1st in | 57% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 22/25 | 109/143 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 47/91 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 52% |
Van De Zandschulp struck 4 aces . Jorda Sanchis managed to score 14 aces (4.7 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 88% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Jorda Sanchis won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Jorda Sanchis |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 8 |
| Converted | 5/10 | 8/24 |
| % Converted | 50% | 33% |
| Conceded | 0 | 13 |
| Saved | 0 | 10 |
| % Saved | 0% | 77% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Botic broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Van De Zandschulp very solid his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Jorda Sanchis broke his opponents 8 times with a 33% conversion rate. Jorda Sanchis conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Choinski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 56-26 | 56-26 | |
| Total points | 82 | 82 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 25/44 | 25/44 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 22/25 | 22/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 9/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Jorda Sanchis | |||||
| Q1 Blancaneaux |
Q3 Luz |
R1 Engel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-2 7-67 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 19 | 21 | 71 | |
| pts | 103-102 | 68-57 | 65-61 | 236-220 | |
| Total points | 205 | 125 | 126 | 456 | |
| Winners | 46 | 28 | 35 | 109 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 41% | 54% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 8 | 3 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 68/108 | 31/57 | 44/69 | 143/234 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 54% | 64% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 46/68 | 28/31 | 35/44 | 109/143 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 90% | 80% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/40 | 14/26 | 14/25 | 47/91 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 54% | 56% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 2/11 | 2/3 | 8/24 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 18% | 67% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 4 | 2 | 13 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4/4 | 2/2 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 100% | 100% | 257% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWWLWL
WLWWLWWWLL Tennis Scores in Braunschweig Challenger
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Ignacio BuseBuse (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Alex BarrenaBarrena (7-64 7-66) – See score progression
- David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis – Justin EngelEngel (6-2 7-67) – See score progression
- Diego DeduraDedura – Elias YmerYmer (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (7-62 6-74 7-62) – See score progression
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Tom GentzschGentzsch – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-73 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Norbert GombosGombos (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Clement TaburTabur (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Max HoukesHoukes – Mika PetkovicPetkovic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis – Justin EngelEngel (6-2 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Max HoukesHoukes – Mika PetkovicPetkovic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Norbert GombosGombos (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (7-6(2) 6-7(4) 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Alex BarrenaBarrena (7-6(4) 7-6(6)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Alex MolcanMolcan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
