Juan Manuel Cerundolo and Nerman Fatic will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Braunschweig Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:30 am on COURT 5. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Juan Manuel Cerundolo who should win in 3 sets.
Juan Manuel Cerundolo -> 1.52
Nerman Fatic -> 2.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs. Nerman Fatic
There is no head to head record between Juan Manuel Cerundolo and Nerman Fatic since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
30 - 19win/loss
85
71
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 48-29 | 9-8 | 39-19 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 46-28 | 0-3 | 46-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-32 | 4-2 | 37-28 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-17 | 3-6 | 24-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-26 | 0-0 | 53-22 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 112, the Argentine reached the 2nd round after beating Federico Arnaboldi 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, Manuel Cerundolo had a good straight sets win against Arnaboldi (6-3 6-3). During the match, Manuel Cerundolo scored 65 points vs Arnaboldi’s 50. Juan was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Manuel Cerundolo made 5 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults. Juan Manuel Cerundolo was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 73% (32/44) of his 1st serve and 56% (10/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Manuel Cerundolo broke Arnaboldi 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Manuel Cerundolo has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 62% of his matches (275-168). 30-15 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Manuel Cerundolo has a compiled266-144 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
The Argentine’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Cordoba Challenger.
Manuel Cerundolo has a compiled 30-19 win-loss record in 2025, 30-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Braunschweig Challenger
Juan has never competed in this tournament before.
Nerman Fatic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 47-18 | 2-1 | 44-15 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 23-26 | 3-5 | 19-20 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-28 | 0-1 | 35-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-27 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-26 | 1-1 | 30-22 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 239, Fatic got to the 2nd round after beating Roman Andres Burruchaga 4-6 6-3 7-5.
In the 1st round against Andres Burruchaga, Nerman recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 7-5). During the match Fatic scored 108 points vs Andres Burruchaga’s 99. The Bosnian was very aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Talking about serving, Fatic fired 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Nerman Fatic lost the serve 4 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Fatic put 64% of his first serves in, winning 73% (49/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (14/37) on the 2nd serve. Nerman broke Andres Burruchaga 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Nerman’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Antalya,M15 Porec,M15 Dubrovnik,the Skopje Challenger and the Perugia Challenger.
Fatic has a compiled 34-8 win-loss record in 2025, 34-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Manuel Cerundolo | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 31 |
| Pts | 65-50 | 108-99 |
| Total Points | 115 | 207 |
| Winners | 32 | 49 |
| %Winners | 49% | 45% |
Both Manuel Cerundolo and Fatic played 1 match. At the moment, Nerman Fatic surrendered 1 set while Juan Manuel Cerundolo hasn’t lost a set so far. Manuel Cerundolo has played 1 set(s) less than Fatic (2 vs 3). Therefore, Manuel Cerundolo played 13 games less than Fatic. Juan scored 32 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Fatic recorded 49 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Manuel Cerundolo | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 4 |
| 1st in | 44/62 | 67/104 |
| %1st in | 71% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 32/44 | 49/67 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 14/37 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 38% |
Manuel Cerundolo managed to score 5 aces . Fatic scored 4 aces . Manuel Cerundolo won 73% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Fatic won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 38% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Manuel Cerundolo | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 75% | 56% |
| Conceded | 5 | 12 |
| Saved | 5 | 8 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
The Argentine broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Juan extremely effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 5 break points. Fatic broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Nerman conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Manuel Cerundolo | |||
| R1 Arnaboldi | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 65-50 | 65-50 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 44/62 | 44/62 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 32/44 | 32/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 10/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Fatic | |||
| R1 Andres | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 108-99 | 108-99 | |
| Total points | 207 | 207 | |
| Winners | 49 | 49 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 67/104 | 67/104 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 49/67 | 49/67 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/37 | 14/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 8/12 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Braunschweig Challenger
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (7-6(2) 6-7(4) 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Alex BarrenaBarrena (7-64 7-66) – See score progression
- Diego DeduraDedura – Elias YmerYmer (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Clement TaburTabur (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tom GentzschGentzsch – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-73 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Max HoukesHoukes – Mika PetkovicPetkovic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Ignacio BuseBuse (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Max HoukesHoukes – Mika PetkovicPetkovic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis – Justin EngelEngel (6-2 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Norbert GombosGombos (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Clement TaburTabur (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tom GentzschGentzsch – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-7(3) 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Ignacio BuseBuse (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Diego DeduraDedura – Elias YmerYmer (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Max HoukesHoukes – Mika PetkovicPetkovic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Norbert GombosGombos (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (7-6(2) 6-7(4) 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Alex BarrenaBarrena (7-6(4) 7-6(6)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – Alex MolcanMolcan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – (0-1) – H2H and prediction