
Yannick Hanfmann and Luka Pavlovic will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Braunschweig Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:30 am on COURT 11. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Yannick Hanfmann who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Yannick Hanfmann is the pick to win this match.
Yannick Hanfmann -> 1.3
Luka Pavlovic -> 3.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Yannick Hanfmann vs. Luka Pavlovic
There is no head to head record between Yannick Hanfmann and Luka Pavlovic since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Yannick Hanfmann

17 - 16win/loss
103
45
LWLWWWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46-28 | 12-9 | 17-12 | 12-4 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 24-33 | 8-11 | 12-15 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-30 | 6-8 | 29-14 | 4-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-26 | 4-3 | 21-16 | 7-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-24 | 1-4 | 14-11 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 135, Hanfmann got to the 2nd round after beating Clement Tabur 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Yannick had a good straight sets win against Tabur (6-3 6-4). During the match, Hanfmann scored 75 points vs Tabur’s 66. Yannick was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Hanfmann made 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Yannick Hanfmann lost the serve once and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Hanfmann put 51% of his first serves in, winning 58% (22/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 65% (24/37) on the 2nd serve. Hanfmann broke Tabur 3 times after converting 27% of his break points (3/11).
Hanfmann has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (316-232). 7-9 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Hanfmann has a composed 195-113 match record in the last years on clay.
Yannick has an overall 17-16 win-loss record in 2025, 7-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Braunschweig Challenger
Luka Pavlovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-23 | 1-2 | 30-19 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 44-18 | 0-0 | 42-16 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-12 | 0-1 | 38-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 11-12 | 3-2 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-14 | 1-1 | 15-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 241, the French player got to the 2nd round after defeating Tomas Martin Etcheverry 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Luka had a good straight sets win against Etcheverry (6-4 6-4). During the match Pavlovic scored 77 points vs Etcheverry’s 74. Luka was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Pavlovic fired 11 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Luka Pavlovic lost the serve once and he saved 14 break points. Furthermore, Pavlovic put 45% of his first serves in, winning 85% (35/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (20/50) on the 2nd serve. Pavlovic broke Etcheverry 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
The French player best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Mexico City Challenger and the Brasov Challenger.
The French player has a composed 28-14 win-loss record in 2025, 26-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hanfmann | Pavlovic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 20 |
| Pts | 75-66 | 77-74 |
| Total Points | 141 | 151 |
| Winners | 22 | 35 |
| %Winners | 29% | 45% |
Both Hanfmann and Pavlovic played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Hanfmann and Pavlovic have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Hanfmann played 1 game less than Pavlovic. The German scored 22 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Pavlovic recorded 35 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hanfmann | Pavlovic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 11 |
| 1st in | 38/75 | 41/91 |
| %1st in | 51% | 45% |
| 1st pts | 22/38 | 35/41 |
| %1st pts | 58% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 24/37 | 20/50 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 40% |
Hanfmann scored 2 aces . Pavlovic bagged 11 aces . Hanfmann won 58% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Pavlovic won 85% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 40% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hanfmann | Pavlovic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/11 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 27% | 43% |
| Conceded | 10 | 15 |
| Saved | 9 | 14 |
| % Saved | 90% | 93% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Hanfmann broke his opponent 3 times with a 27% conversion rate. Hanfmann lost his serve once and he saved 90% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The French player conceded his serve once and he saved 93% of the break points that he conceded.
| Hanfmann | |||
| R1 Tabur |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 75-66 | 75-66 | |
| Total points | 141 | 141 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 38/75 | 38/75 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 22/38 | 22/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 58% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/37 | 24/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/11 | 3/11 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 9/10 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 90% | 90% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Pavlovic | |||
| R1 Etcheverry |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 77-74 | 77-74 | |
| Total points | 151 | 151 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 41/91 | 41/91 | |
| % 1st in | 45% | 45% | |
| 1st pts | 35/41 | 35/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/50 | 20/50 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 15 | |
| Saved | 14/15 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 93% | 93% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWWWLW
LLWLWLLWLL Tennis Scores in Braunschweig Challenger
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Norbert GombosGombos (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (7-6(2) 6-7(4) 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Alex BarrenaBarrena (7-64 7-66) – See score progression
- Diego DeduraDedura – Elias YmerYmer (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Clement TaburTabur (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tom GentzschGentzsch – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-73 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Max HoukesHoukes – Mika PetkovicPetkovic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Ignacio BuseBuse (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Max HoukesHoukes – Mika PetkovicPetkovic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis – Justin EngelEngel (6-2 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Clement TaburTabur (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tom GentzschGentzsch – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-7(3) 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Ignacio BuseBuse (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Diego DeduraDedura – Elias YmerYmer (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Max HoukesHoukes – Mika PetkovicPetkovic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Norbert GombosGombos (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (7-6(2) 6-7(4) 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Alex BarrenaBarrena (7-6(4) 7-6(6)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – Alex MolcanMolcan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – (0-1) – H2H and prediction









