Tristan Mccormick and James Watt will clash against each other in the 1st round of the Newport Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 11:00 am on COURT 6. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Watt who should win in 3 sets.
James Watt -> 1.66
Tristan Mccormick -> 2.12
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tristan Mccormick vs. James Watt
There is no head to head record between Tristan Mccormick and James Watt since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Tristan Mccormick
22 - 21win/loss
485
484
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 36-36 | 13-16 | 17-16 | 4-3 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-32 | 9-11 | 17-17 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-20 | 4-7 | 14-8 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-11 | 13-5 | 7-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-6 | 14-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 612, Tristan got to the 1st round after beating Blake Bayldon 6-4 3-6 7-5 and Joshua Sheehy 4-6 6-3 7-6(9).
In the qualifications against Sheehy, Mccormick recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 7-69). During the match, Mccormick scored 105 points vs Sheehy’s 98. The American was very aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mccormick scored 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Tristan Mccormick was pretty efficient on serve to win 73% (51/70) of his 1st serve and 57% (21/37) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The American broke Sheehy twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has lost 2 set in this tournament to conquer 52% of the points he played.
Mccormick has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (124-92). 2-0 on grass in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Mccormick has a composed2-0 match record in the last 6 years on grass.
Mccormick’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Orange Park.
Tristan has a composed 22-20 win-loss record in 2025, 2-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Newport Challenger
Tristan has never competed in this tournament before.
James Watt
9 - 12win/loss
683
569
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16-20 | 9-13 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-21 | 22-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 10-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 6-12 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 722, James reached the 1st round after beating Henry Barrett 6-1 6-2 and Oscar Weightman 6-4 6-2.
James has an overall 8-12 win-loss record in 2025, 1-3 on grass (See FULL STATS)
.H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mccormick | Watt |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 63 | 15 |
| Pts | 204-186 | 55-23 |
| Total Points | 390 | 78 |
| Winners | 95 | 26 |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% |
Mccormick played 2 matches while Watt competed in 1 match. At the moment, Tristan Mccormick surrendered 2 sets while James Watt hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Mccormick has played 4 sets more than Watt (6 vs 2). Therefore, Mccormick played 48 games more than Watt. The American scored 95 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The Kiwi bagged 26 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mccormick | Watt |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 7.5 | 5 |
| 1st in | 134/197 | 30/37 |
| %1st in | 68% | 81% |
| 1st pts | 95/134 | 26/30 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 87% |
| 2nd pts | 36/63 | 6/7 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 86% |
Mccormick struck 15 aces (7.5 per match). Watt scored 5 aces . Mccormick won 71% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Watt won 87% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 86% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mccormick | Watt |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/12 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 17 | 0 |
| Saved | 12 | 0 |
| % Saved | 71% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
Tristan broke his opponents 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. James broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Watt was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Mccormick | ||||
| Q1 Bayldon | Q3 Sheehy | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | 4-6 6-3 7-69 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 32 | 63 | |
| pts | 99-88 | 105-98 | 204-186 | |
| Total points | 187 | 203 | 390 | |
| Winners | 44 | 51 | 95 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 49% | 47% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 9 | 6 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 64/90 | 70/107 | 134/197 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 65% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 44/64 | 51/70 | 95/134 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 73% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 21/37 | 36/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 2/4 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 8 | 17 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6/8 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 75% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Watt | ||||
| Q1 Barrett | Q3 Weightman | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 18 | 33 | |
| pts | 55-23 | – | 55-23 | |
| Total points | 78 | 0 | 78 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | ||
| %Winners | 47% | 0% | 47% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 0 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1st in | 30/37 | / | 30/37 | |
| % 1st in | 81% | 0% | 81% | |
| 1st pts | 26/30 | / | 26/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 0% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/7 | / | 6/7 | |
| % 2nd pts | 86% | 0% | 86% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | ||
| Converted | 4/8 | / | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | ||
Tennis Scores in Newport Challenger
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – James DuckworthDuckworth (6-2 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Aidan MayoMayo – Dan MartinMartin (7-5 4-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Evan ZhuZhu (7-5 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Stefan KozlovKozlov (6-1 3-6 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karl PolingPoling – Oscar WeightmanWeightman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand – Tyler ZinkZink (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan MccormickMccormick – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Alex BoltBolt (3-0) – H2H and prediction