Patrick Zahraj and Axel Nefve will face off in the 1st round of the Nottingham 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 6:30 pm on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Zahraj who should win in 2 sets.
Patrick Zahraj -> 1.191
Axel Nefve -> 4.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Patrick Zahraj vs. Axel Nefve
There is no head to head record between Patrick Zahraj and Axel Nefve since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Patrick Zahraj
25 - 20win/loss
267
240
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 38-36 | 0-1 | 9-15 | 24-16 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-31 | 9-5 | 17-15 | 14-9 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2023 | 28-16 | 4-3 | 15-10 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2022 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 280, Patrick reached the 1st round after beating William Jansen 6-4 6-2 and Dylan Dietrich 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, Patrick had a good straight sets win against Dietrich (6-4 6-1). During the match, Zahraj scored 66 points vs Dietrich’s 43. The German was pretty aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Zahraj scored 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Patrick Zahraj lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Zahraj put 61% of his first serves in, winning 67% (18/27) of the points behind his 1st serve and 65% (11/17) on the 2nd serve. Patrick broke Dietrich 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Zahraj started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to conquer 60% of the points he played.
Zahraj has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (132-99). 3-3 on grass in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Zahraj has a compiled3-3 match record in the last 8 years on grass.
The German’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Pau Challenger.
Zahraj has a compiled 24-20 win-loss record in 2025, 3-3 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 3 Challenger
Zahraj has never competed in this tournament before.
Axel Nefve
24 - 17win/loss
900
731
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30-29 | 22-19 | 1-5 | 4-3 | 2-1 | 1-1 |
| 2024 | 22-23 | 9-13 | 11-8 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-13 | 15-9 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-8 | 3-3 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-7 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 826, Axel got to the 1st round after defeating Luca Pow 7-6(5) 6-2 and Petros Tsitsipas 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Tsitsipas (6-3 6-3). During the match Nefve scored 69 points vs Tsitsipas’s 54. The American was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Nefve recorded 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Axel Nefve was very efficient on serve to win 71% (34/48) of his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Axel broke Tsitsipas 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Nefve’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Huamantla and M15 Kayseri.
The American has an overall 24-16 win-loss record in 2025, 2-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zahraj | Nefve |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 35 | 39 |
| Pts | 128-86 | 141-118 |
| Total Points | 214 | 259 |
| Winners | 36 | 67 |
| %Winners | 28% | 48% |
Both Zahraj and Nefve played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Zahraj and Nefve have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Zahraj played 4 games less than Nefve. The German scored 36 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, Axel struck 67 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zahraj | Nefve |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3 |
| 1st in | 45/87 | 98/136 |
| %1st in | 52% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 36/45 | 67/98 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 29/42 | 17/38 |
| %2nd pts | 69% | 45% |
Zahraj fired 8 aces (4 per match). Nefve fired 6 aces (3 per match). Zahraj won 80% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Nefve won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zahraj | Nefve |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 9 |
| Converted | 9/21 | 9/16 |
| % Converted | 43% | 56% |
| Conceded | 5 | 16 |
| Saved | 3 | 12 |
| % Saved | 60% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Zahraj broke his opponents 9 times with a 43% conversion rate. Patrick dropped his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 9 times with a 56% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Zahraj | ||||
| Q1 Jansen | Q3 Dietrich | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 | 35 | |
| pts | 62-43 | 66-43 | 128-86 | |
| Total points | 105 | 109 | 214 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 27% | 28% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 18/43 | 27/44 | 45/87 | |
| % 1st in | 42% | 61% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 18/18 | 18/27 | 36/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 100% | 67% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/25 | 11/17 | 29/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 72% | 65% | 69% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 6/12 | 9/21 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 50% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | – | 60% | 30% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Nefve | ||||
| Q1 Pow | Q3 Tsitsipas | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-2 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 18 | 39 | |
| pts | 72-64 | 69-54 | 141-118 | |
| Total points | 136 | 123 | 259 | |
| Winners | 33 | 34 | 67 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 49% | 48% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 50/72 | 48/64 | 98/136 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 75% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 33/50 | 34/48 | 67/98 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 71% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/22 | 10/16 | 17/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 32% | 63% | 45% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 3/5 | 9/16 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 60% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 5 | 16 | |
| Saved | 7/11 | 5/5 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 64% | 100% | 82% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Nottingham 3 Challenger
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – Dylan DietrichDietrich (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Patrick BradyBrady – Andrin CasanovaCasanova (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Axel NefveNefve – Petros TsitsipasTsitsipas (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer – Amit ValesVales (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Tom HandsHands – Alexis CanterCanter (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Lui MaxtedMaxted – Finn BassBass (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kenny de Schepperde Schepper – Matteo MartineauMartineau (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Liam BroadyBroady (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Ben JonesJones (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur ReymondReymond – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Axel NefveNefve – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taha BaadiBaadi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alastair GrayGray – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Connor ThomsonThomson – James StoryStory (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hamish StewartStewart – Matthew SummersSummers (0-0) – H2H and prediction