James Watt and Oscar Weightman will play each other in the qualifications of the Newport Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Watt who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, James Watt is the pick to win this match.
James Watt -> 1.85
Oscar Weightman -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head James Watt vs. Oscar Weightman
There is no head to head record between James Watt and Oscar Weightman since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
James Watt
8 - 12win/loss
693
569
LWLWLLWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16-20 | 9-13 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-21 | 22-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 10-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 6-12 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 722, Watt got to the qualifications after defeating Henry Barrett 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Kiwi had a good straight sets win against Barrett (6-1 6-2). During the match, Watt scored 55 points vs Barrett’s 23. Watt was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Watt struck 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. James Watt was very efficient on serve to win 87% (26/30) of his 1st serve and 86% (6/7) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Watt broke Barrett 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Watt has a winning match record in the last 4 years having won 52% of his matches (50-46). 1-2 on grass in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Watt has a compiled11-4 record in the last 4 years on grass.
James has an aggregate 8-11 win-loss record in 2025, 1-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Newport Challenger
James has never competed in this tournament before.
Oscar Weightman
2 - 2win/loss
806
603
WWWWWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 12-5 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 2-1 |
| 2024 | 7-9 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 7-16 | 7-13 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-22 | 24-14 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-12 | 10-6 | 0-3 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Oscar got to the qualifications after beating Takeru Yuzuki 6-7(4) 6-1 7-6(3).
In the qualifications against Yuzuki, The Brit recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 6-1 7-63). During the match Weightman scored 117 points vs Yuzuki’s 100. Weightman was exceptionally aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Weightman struck 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Oscar Weightman was extremely efficient on serve to win 75% (42/56) of his 1st serve and 60% (24/40) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Oscar broke Yuzuki 4 times after converting 24% of his break points (4/17).
Oscar has an overall 1-2 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Watt | Weightman |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 33 |
| Pts | 55-23 | 117-100 |
| Total Points | 78 | 217 |
| Winners | 26 | 42 |
| %Winners | 47% | 36% |
Both Watt and Weightman played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Oscar Weightman lost 1 set while James Watt hasn’t conceded a set so far. Watt has played 1 set(s) less than Weightman (2 vs 3). Therefore, Watt played 18 games less than Weightman. James scored 26 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit fired 42 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Watt | Weightman |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 8 |
| 1st in | 30/37 | 56/96 |
| %1st in | 81% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 26/30 | 42/56 |
| %1st pts | 87% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 6/7 | 24/40 |
| %2nd pts | 86% | 60% |
Watt managed to score 5 aces . Weightman managed to score 8 aces . Watt won 87% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 86% of the points. On the other side, Weightman won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Watt | Weightman |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/17 |
| % Converted | 50% | 24% |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Watt broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. James very solid his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Brit broke his opponent 4 times with a 24% conversion rate. Weightman conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Watt | |||
| Q1 Barrett |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 55-23 | 55-23 | |
| Total points | 78 | 78 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 30/37 | 30/37 | |
| % 1st in | 81% | 81% | |
| 1st pts | 26/30 | 26/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/7 | 6/7 | |
| % 2nd pts | 86% | 86% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Weightman | |||
| Q1 Yuzuki |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-74 6-1 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 117-100 | 117-100 | |
| Total points | 217 | 217 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 56/96 | 56/96 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 42/56 | 42/56 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/40 | 24/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/17 | 4/17 | |
| Converted % | 24% | 24% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLWLWL
WWWWWLWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Stefan KozlovKozlov (4-5) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Kiranpal PannuPannu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand – Matt KuharKuhar (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan MartinMartin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan MccormickMccormick – Joshua SheehySheehy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Alex BoltBolt (3-0) – H2H and prediction
