Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Trey Hilderbrand who should win in 2 sets.
Trey Hilderbrand -> 1.28
Matt Kuhar -> 3.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Trey Hilderbrand vs. Matt Kuhar
This will be the 2nd time that Trey Hilderbrand and Matt Kuhar square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Hilderbrand (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on grass.
The last time that they squared off, Hilderbrand won 6-4 4-6 6-4 in the qualifications in the Cleveland Challenger back in January 2025.
Trey Hilderbrand
12 - 7win/loss
744
620
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16-14 | 7-9 | 2-1 | 5-3 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-20 | 15-10 | 9-8 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-13 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-9 | 9-5 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 711, Hilderbrand reached the qualifications after beating Boris Kozlov 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, Trey had a good straight sets win against Kozlov (6-2 6-3). During the match, Hilderbrand scored 57 points vs Kozlov’s 31. Trey was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Hilderbrand recorded 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Trey Hilderbrand was quite effective on serve to win 96% (27/28) of his 1st serve and 55% (6/11) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Kozlov 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Hilderbrand has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 60% of his matches (85-57). 1-0 on grass in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Hilderbrand has an aggregate4-1 record in the last 7 years on grass.
Trey has an overall 11-7 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Newport Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Matt Kuhar
16 - 14win/loss
893
844
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22-24 | 15-14 | 1-2 | 5-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 14-17 | 14-11 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 8-8 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 9-7 | 8-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-8 | 14-6 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 890, Matt got to the qualifications after defeating Wally Thayne 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Thayne (6-3 6-1). During the match Kuhar scored 59 points vs Thayne’s 35. Matt was exceptionally aggressive to blast 19 winners.
About the serving games, Kuhar couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Matt Kuhar was pretty efficient on serve to win 76% (19/25) of his 1st serve and 71% (10/14) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Thayne 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Matt has a composed 16-13 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hilderbrand | Kuhar |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 16 |
| Pts | 57-31 | 59-35 |
| Total Points | 88 | 94 |
| Winners | 27 | 19 |
| %Winners | 47% | 32% |
Both Hilderbrand and Kuhar played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Hilderbrand and Kuhar have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Hilderbrand played 1 game more than Kuhar. Trey scored 27 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Matt made 19 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hilderbrand | Kuhar |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 0 |
| 1st in | 28/39 | 25/39 |
| %1st in | 72% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 27/28 | 19/25 |
| %1st pts | 96% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 10/14 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 71% |
Hilderbrand made 7 aces . Kuhar didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Hilderbrand won 96% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Kuhar won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hilderbrand | Kuhar |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 5/11 |
| % Converted | 40% | 45% |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Trey broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Trey conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Hilderbrand | |||
| Q1 Kozlov | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 57-31 | 57-31 | |
| Total points | 88 | 88 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 28/39 | 28/39 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 27/28 | 27/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 96% | 96% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Kuhar | |||
| Q1 Thayne | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 59-35 | 59-35 | |
| Total points | 94 | 94 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 25/39 | 25/39 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 19/25 | 19/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/14 | 10/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Stefan KozlovKozlov (4-5) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Kiranpal PannuPannu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand – Matt KuharKuhar (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan MartinMartin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan MccormickMccormick – Joshua SheehySheehy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Alex BoltBolt (3-0) – H2H and prediction