
Jack Draper and Marin Cilic will face off in the 2nd round of Wimbledon for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 5:00 pm on Court 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Draper who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jack Draper is the pick to win this match.
Jack Draper -> 1.148
Marin Cilic -> 5.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jack Draper vs. Marin Cilic
There is no head to head record between Jack Draper and Marin Cilic since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Jack Draper


29 - 8win/loss
5
4

Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 29-9 | 13-3 | 12-4 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2024 | 39-22 | 19-10 | 5-7 | 7-3 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 34-15 | 15-8 | 3-3 | 16-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 46-19 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 26-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 18-16 | 6-6 | 7-5 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 4 (career-high), Draper reached the 2nd round after defeating Sebastian Baez 6-2 6-2 2-1 ret..
In the 1st round against Baez, Draper had a free pass after Baez retired on a 6-2 6-2 2-1 . scoreline.
Draper has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 69% of his matches (255-112). 4-1 on grass in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Draper has an aggregate21-14 record in the last 8 years on grass.
His best result of the season was winning the title in Indian Wells where he defeated Holger Rune in the final 6-2 6-2.
Jack has an aggregate 29-8 win-loss record in 2025, 4-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Marin Cilic


20 - 10win/loss
65
3

Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 22-11 | 2-2 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 9-2 | 0-0 |
2024 | 9-11 | 8-6 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 32-21 | 16-10 | 9-5 | 4-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 33-23 | 6-9 | 5-5 | 13-7 | 9-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 83, Marin got to the 2nd round after beating Raphael Collignon 6-3 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Cilic had a good straight sets win against Collignon (6-3 6-4 6-3). During the match Cilic scored 90 points vs Collignon’s 70. Marin was very aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Cilic managed to score 16 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Marin Cilic was exceptionally effective on serve to win 84% (37/44) of his 1st serve and 58% (18/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Croatian broke Collignon 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Girona Challenger where he beat Elmer Moller in the final 6-3 6-4 and the Nottingham 2 Challenger where he beat Shintaro Mochizuki in the final 6-2 6-3.
Cilic has a composed 20-10 win-loss record in 2025, 7-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2017. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Draper | Cilic |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 4 | 3 |
Tot Games | 19 | 28 |
Pts | 65-39 | 90-70 |
Total Points | 104 | 160 |
Winners | 25 | 37 |
%Winners | 38% | 41% |
Both Draper and Cilic played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Draper has played 1 set more than Cilic (4 vs 3). However, it’s interesting to notice that Draper played 9 games less than Cilic. The Brit scored 25 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Marin fired 37 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Draper | Cilic |
---|---|---|
Aces | 10 | 16 |
Avg per match | 10 | 16 |
1st in | 27/41 | 44/75 |
%1st in | 66% | 59% |
1st pts | 25/27 | 37/44 |
%1st pts | 93% | 84% |
2nd pts | 11/14 | 18/31 |
%2nd pts | 79% | 58% |
Draper scored 10 aces . Cilic scored 16 aces . Draper won 93% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 79% of the points. On the other side, Cilic won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Draper | Cilic |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 5 |
Converted | 5/5 | 5/13 |
% Converted | 100% | 38% |
Conceded | 0 | 4 |
Saved | 0 | 3 |
% Saved | 0% | 75% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Draper broke his opponent 5 times with a 100% conversion rate. The Brit pretty solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Cilic broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Cilic conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
Draper | |||
R1 Baez |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 2-1 ret. | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 65-39 | 65-39 | |
Total points | 104 | 104 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 10 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 27/41 | 27/41 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 25/27 | 25/27 | |
% 1st pts | 93% | 93% | |
2nd pts | 11/14 | 11/14 | |
% 2nd pts | 79% | 79% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/5 | 5/5 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Cilic | |||
R1 Collignon |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
pts | 90-70 | 90-70 | |
Total points | 160 | 160 | |
Winners | 37 | 37 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 16 | 16 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 44/75 | 44/75 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 37/44 | 37/44 | |
% 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
2nd pts | 18/31 | 18/31 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head



Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-3 6-4 4-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (6-2 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Reilly OpelkaOpelka – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (6-3 7-5 7-64) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-3 7-67 6-1) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Alexander ZverevZverev (7-63 6-78 6-3 6-75 6-4) – See score progression
- Tommy PaulPaul – Johannus MondayMonday (6-4 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic (7-68 3-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Francisco ComesanaComesana (6-4 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Marin CilicCilic – Raphael CollignonCollignon (6-3 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Novak DjokovicDjokovic – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-1 6-77 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Jaime FariaFaria (6-3 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Christopher EubanksEubanks (6-3 6-75 6-77 6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Sebastian BaezBaez (6-2 6-2 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Denis ShapovalovShapovalov (3-6 6-4 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (7-64 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – George LoffhagenLoffhagen (2-6 6-2 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – David GoffinGoffin (6-3 6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (6-3 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Luca NardiNardi (6-4 6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (2-6 3-6 6-3 7-66 7-5) – See score progression
- Ben SheltonShelton – Alex BoltBolt (6-4 7-61 7-6) – See score progression
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Quentin HalysHalys (7-64 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Taylor FritzFritz – Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard (6-76 6-78 6-4 7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – James McCabeMcCabe (6-1 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Adam WaltonWalton (6-3 7-66 4-6 6-75 6-1) – See score progression
- Gael MonfilsMonfils – Ugo HumbertHumbert (6-4 3-6 6-75 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Jakub MensikMensik – Hugo GastonGaston (6-1 4-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Jay ClarkeClarke (6-1 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Marcos GironGiron – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (7-66 7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Alex MichelsenMichelsen (6-2 3-6 6-3 3-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (6-3 6-75 6-1 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Alexander BublikBublik (6-4 3-6 4-6 7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi (7-64 7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (6-2 4-6 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (6-2 6-2 7-62) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Henry SearleSearle (4-6 6-2 7-611 6-2) – See score progression
- Arthur FeryFery – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (6-4 6-1 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Luciano DarderiDarderi – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (7-63 1-6 6-72 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy (7-65 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Joao FonsecaFonseca – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (6-4 6-1 7-65) – See score progression
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Brandon HoltHolt (6-2 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Cristian GarinGarin – Chris RodeschRodesch (7-68 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Carlos AlcarazAlcaraz – Fabio FogniniFognini (7-5 6-75 7-5 2-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Filip MisolicMisolic (6-2 5-7 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (6-1 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Daniil MedvedevMedvedev (7-62 3-6 7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini (4-6 6-2 6-4 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (6-2 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (7-5 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas (6-3 6-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Vit KoprivaKopriva (3-6 4-6 6-3 7-61 6-1) – See score progression
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (6-3 3-6 6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (6-2 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Felix Auger-AliassimeAuger-Aliassime – James DuckworthDuckworth (6-2 3-6 6-72 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Hugo DellienDellien (4-6 6-2 6-2 7-60) – See score progression
- Andrey RublevRublev – Laslo DjereDjere (6-0 7-65 6-79 7-66) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Zizou BergsBergs (7-67 7-62 6-75 6-2) – See score progression
- Oliver TarvetTarvet – Leandro RiediRiedi (6-4 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mattia BellucciBellucci – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (6-72 6-3 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Dusan LajovicLajovic (6-3 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Elmer MollerMoller (6-3 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (4-6 6-3 7-65 6-0) – See score progression
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Holger RuneRune (4-6 4-6 7-5 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Novak DjokovicDjokovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Corentin MoutetMoutet (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Gael MonfilsMonfils (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Marcos GironGiron – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Christian GarinGarin – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Mariano NavoneNavone (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas JarryJarry – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Tommy PaulPaul (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey RublevRublev – Lloyd HarrisHarris (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Billy HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Aleksandar VukicVukic (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jack DraperDraper – Marin CilicCilic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction