Jakub Paul and Stefanos Sakellaridis will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Modena Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 2:30 pm on COURT 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jakub Paul who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jakub Paul is the pick to win this match.
Jakub Paul -> 1.363
Stefanos Sakellaridis -> 2.93
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jakub Paul vs. Stefanos Sakellaridis
There is no head to head record between Jakub Paul and Stefanos Sakellaridis since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Jakub Paul
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22-12 | 7-2 | 6-4 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 44-27 | 15-9 | 17-11 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-24 | 20-4 | 14-12 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2022 | 25-26 | 4-4 | 20-18 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 34-21 | 4-3 | 17-10 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 356, Jakub reached the qualifications after beating Federico Iannaccone 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Jakub had a good straight sets win against Iannaccone (6-2 6-4). During the match, Paul scored 74 points vs Iannaccone’s 58. Paul was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Paul scored just 1 ace and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults. Jakub Paul lost the serve twice and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Paul put 58% of his first serves in, winning 63% (24/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (17/28) on the 2nd serve. Paul broke Iannaccone 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Paul has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 56% of his matches (226-174). 6-4 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Paul has a compiled92-76 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
Jakub’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Koblenz Challenger.
Paul has a compiled 22-12 win-loss record in 2025, 6-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Modena Challenger
Paul has never competed in this tournament before.
Stefanos Sakellaridis
29 - 12win/loss
423
392
WLLLLWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-12 | 26-8 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 43-29 | 35-25 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 66-52 | 35-26 | 30-23 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 66-49 | 23-13 | 38-33 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-36 | 5-1 | 29-35 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 423, Sakellaridis reached the qualifications after beating Martin Krumich 6-7(1) 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications against Krumich, Sakellaridis recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-71 6-3 6-3). During the match Sakellaridis scored 100 points vs Krumich’s 87. The Greek was pretty aggressive to blast 46 winners.
About the serving games, Sakellaridis struck 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Stefanos Sakellaridis was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 79% (46/58) of his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Greek broke Krumich 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Sakellaridis’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir and M15 Heraklion.
Stefanos has a compiled 29-12 win-loss record in 2025, 3-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Paul | Sakellaridis |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 31 |
| Pts | 74-58 | 100-87 |
| Total Points | 132 | 187 |
| Winners | 24 | 46 |
| %Winners | 32% | 46% |
Both Paul and Sakellaridis played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Stefanos Sakellaridis lost 1 set while Jakub Paul hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Paul has played 1 set(s) less than Sakellaridis (2 vs 3). Therefore, Paul played 13 games less than Sakellaridis. Jakub scored 24 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, The Greek fired 46 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Paul | Sakellaridis |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 4 |
| 1st in | 38/66 | 58/84 |
| %1st in | 58% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 24/38 | 46/58 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 17/28 | 14/26 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 54% |
Paul recorded 1 ace . Sakellaridis also blasted 4 aces . Paul won 63% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Sakellaridis won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Paul | Sakellaridis |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/12 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 42% | 57% |
| Conceded | 11 | 3 |
| Saved | 9 | 2 |
| % Saved | 82% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Jakub broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. The Swiss conceded his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded. The Greek broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Greek conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Paul | |||
| Q1 Iannaccone |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 74-58 | 74-58 | |
| Total points | 132 | 132 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 38/66 | 38/66 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 24/38 | 24/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/28 | 17/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 9/11 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 82% | 82% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Sakellaridis | |||
| Q1 Krumich |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-71 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 100-87 | 100-87 | |
| Total points | 187 | 187 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 58/84 | 58/84 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 46/58 | 46/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/26 | 14/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWLLWWLWW
WLLLLWLWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Giovanni FonioFonio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jakub PaulPaul – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
