Arthur Nagel and Niels Visker will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Troyes Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:00 pm on CHEURLIN DANGIN. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Arthur Nagel who should win in 3 sets.
Arthur Nagel -> 1.69
Niels Visker -> 2.07
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Arthur Nagel vs. Niels Visker
There is no head to head record between Arthur Nagel and Niels Visker since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Arthur Nagel
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 21-15 | 0-0 | 21-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 31-16 | 0-0 | 15-7 | 13-8 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
2023 | 19-12 | 0-0 | 13-4 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 1-3 |
2022 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
Currently unranked, the French player reached the qualifications after beating David Jorda Sanchis 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Jorda Sanchis (6-4 6-2). During the match, Nagel scored 61 points vs Jorda Sanchis’s 43. The French player was quite aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nagel made 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Arthur Nagel lost the serve once. Furthermore, Nagel put 81% of his first serves in, winning 72% (34/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 36% (4/11) on the 2nd serve. The French player was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Jorda Sanchis 4 times.
Nagel has a solid win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 63% of his matches (71-42). 18-10 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Nagel has a composed46-21 record in the last 4 years on clay.
The French player has a composed 18-11 win-loss record in 2025, 18-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Troyes Challenger
Nagel has never competed in this tournament before.
Niels Visker
7 - 15win/loss
631
496
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 13-20 | 1-4 | 11-12 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
2024 | 52-30 | 16-7 | 20-15 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2023 | 45-27 | 19-11 | 26-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2021 | 28-16 | 7-2 | 21-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 652, the Dutch got to the qualifications after defeating Nikolay Vylegzhanin 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Vylegzhanin (6-4 6-4). During the match Visker scored 64 points vs Vylegzhanin’s 56. The Dutch was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Visker scored 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Niels Visker lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Visker put 65% of his first serves in, winning 78% (29/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (9/20) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Vylegzhanin 3 times.
The Dutch has an aggregate 6-15 win-loss record in 2025, 4-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Nagel | Visker |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 18 | 20 |
Pts | 61-43 | 64-56 |
Total Points | 104 | 120 |
Winners | 34 | 29 |
%Winners | 56% | 45% |
Both Nagel and Visker played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Nagel and Visker have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Nagel played 2 games less than Visker. The French player scored 34 winners (56% of the total points). On the other side, Niels made 29 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Nagel | Visker |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 7 |
Avg per match | 3 | 7 |
1st in | 47/58 | 37/57 |
%1st in | 81% | 65% |
1st pts | 34/47 | 29/37 |
%1st pts | 72% | 78% |
2nd pts | 4/11 | 9/20 |
%2nd pts | 36% | 45% |
Nagel struck 3 aces . Visker bagged 7 aces . Nagel won 72% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 36% of the points. On the other side, Visker won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Nagel | Visker |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 3 |
Converted | 4/4 | 3/3 |
% Converted | 100% | 100% |
Conceded | 1 | 2 |
Saved | 0 | 1 |
% Saved | 0% | 50% |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The French player broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. The French player dropped his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
Nagel | |||
Q1 Jorda Sanchis | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 61-43 | 61-43 | |
Total points | 104 | 104 | |
Winners | 34 | 34 | |
%Winners | 56% | 56% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 47/58 | 47/58 | |
% 1st in | 81% | 81% | |
1st pts | 34/47 | 34/47 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
% 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Visker | |||
Q1 Vylegzhanin | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 64-56 | 64-56 | |
Total points | 120 | 120 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 37/57 | 37/57 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 29/37 | 29/37 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 9/20 | 9/20 | |
% 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Florent BaxBax (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Benoit PairePaire (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikael YmerYmer – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur ReymondReymond – Tristan LamasineLamasine (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Neil OberleitnerOberleitner – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Buvaysar GadamauriGadamauri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – Jelle SelsSels (0-0) – H2H and prediction