Dino Prizmic and Marco Cecchinato will fight against each other in the final of the Milan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 4:30 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dino Prizmic who should win in 2 sets.
Dino Prizmic -> 1.23
Marco Cecchinato -> 3.82
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Dino Prizmic vs. Marco Cecchinato
There is no head to head record between Dino Prizmic and Marco Cecchinato since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Dino Prizmic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-15 | 8-4 | 23-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 20-18 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 10-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-19 | 2-1 | 23-9 | 12-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-9 | 21-1 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 173, Prizmic got to the final after beating Gabriele Piraino 6-1 6-4, Jacopo Berrettini 6-1 6-2, Christoph Negritu 6-4 6-3 and Rafael Jodar 3-6 6-3 6-2.
In the semifinal against Jodar, The Croatian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-2). During the match, Prizmic scored 89 points vs Jodar’s 81. Prizmic was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Prizmic struck 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Dino Prizmic lost the serve 5 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Prizmic put 51% of his first serves in, winning 66% (29/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (18/43) on the 2nd serve. Prizmic broke Jodar 7 times after converting 58% of his break points (7/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Prizmic has lost 1 set in this event to win 56% of the points he played.
Prizmic has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 66% of his matches (112-57). 17-2 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Prizmic has a compiled53-28 record in the last 5 years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Zagreb Challenger where he defeated Luca Van Assche in the final 6-2 ret. and the Bratislava 1 Challenger where he defeated Valentin Royer in the final 6-4 7-6(6).
Prizmic has an overall 25-7 win-loss record in 2025, 17-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Milan Challenger
The Croatian has never competed in this tournament before.
Marco Cecchinato
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-34 | 0-0 | 39-34 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-25 | 0-2 | 26-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 13-23 | 1-4 | 12-17 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-33 | 0-3 | 43-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-27 | 1-5 | 31-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 437, Cecchinato got to the final after defeating Max Alcala Gurri 6-4 6-1, Frederico Ferreira Silva 6-3 6-0, Max Houkes 6-4 6-2 and Jacopo Vasami 6-3 6-3.
In the semifinal, Cecchinato had a good straight sets win against Vasami (6-3 6-3). During the match Cecchinato scored 66 points vs Vasami’s 50. Marco was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Cecchinato managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Marco Cecchinato was pretty efficient on serve to win 79% (22/28) of his 1st serve and 68% (19/28) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Italian broke Vasami 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Cecchinato hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 59% of the points he played.
Cecchinato’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Kigali 1 Challenger and the Milan Challenger.
The Italian has a compiled 20-18 win-loss record in 2025, 20-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Milan Challenger
Previously, he won this tournament once in 2016. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Prizmic | Cecchinato |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 77 | 68 |
| Pts | 270-210 | 257-182 |
| Total Points | 480 | 439 |
| Winners | 91 | 92 |
| %Winners | 34% | 36% |
Both Prizmic and Cecchinato played 4 matches. At the moment, Dino Prizmic dropped 1 set while Marco Cecchinato hasn’t conceded a set so far. Prizmic has played 1 set more than Cecchinato (9 vs 8). Therefore, Prizmic played 9 games more than Cecchinato. Prizmic scored 91 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Marco struck 92 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Prizmic | Cecchinato |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 2.5 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 127/259 | 117/215 |
| %1st in | 49% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 91/127 | 92/117 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 62/132 | 64/98 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 65% |
Prizmic struck 10 aces (2.5 per match). Cecchinato struck 9 aces (2.3 per match). Prizmic won 72% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Cecchinato won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Prizmic | Cecchinato |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 22 | 13 |
| Converted | 22/29 | 13/31 |
| % Converted | 76% | 42% |
| Conceded | 23 | 8 |
| Saved | 12 | 8 |
| % Saved | 52% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 11 | 0 |
The Croatian broke his opponents 22 times with a 76% conversion rate. Prizmic lost his serve 11 times and he saved 52% of the break points that he conceded. The Italian broke his opponents 13 times with a 42% conversion rate. Marco was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 8 break points.
| Prizmic | ||||||
| R1 Piraino | R2 Berrettini | 1/4 Negritu | 1/2 Jodar | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | 6-1 6-2 | 6-4 6-3 | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 15 | 19 | 26 | 77 | |
| pts | 65-49 | 55-32 | 61-48 | 89-81 | 270-210 | |
| Total points | 114 | 87 | 109 | 170 | 480 | |
| Winners | 26 | 16 | 20 | 29 | 91 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 29% | 33% | 33% | 34% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 19 | |
| 1st in | 33/62 | 22/46 | 28/64 | 44/87 | 127/259 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 48% | 44% | 51% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 26/33 | 16/22 | 20/28 | 29/44 | 91/127 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 73% | 71% | 66% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/29 | 13/24 | 17/36 | 18/43 | 62/132 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 54% | 47% | 42% | 47% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 22 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 6/7 | 5/6 | 7/12 | 22/29 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 86% | 83% | 58% | 76% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 23 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 3/5 | 3/6 | 2/7 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 60% | 50% | 29% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | |
| Cecchinato | ||||||
| R1 Alcala | R2 Ferreira Silva | 1/4 Houkes | 1/2 Vasami | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 6-3 6-0 | 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 15 | 18 | 18 | 68 | |
| pts | 65-49 | 61-40 | 65-43 | 66-50 | 257-182 | |
| Total points | 114 | 101 | 108 | 116 | 439 | |
| Winners | 24 | 20 | 26 | 22 | 92 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 33% | 40% | 33% | 36% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 30/53 | 29/61 | 30/45 | 28/56 | 117/215 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 48% | 67% | 50% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 20/29 | 26/30 | 22/28 | 92/117 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 69% | 87% | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 20/32 | 11/15 | 19/28 | 64/98 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 63% | 73% | 68% | 65% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 13 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 13/31 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 40% | 60% | 30% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 8 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 4/4 | 2/2 | 1/1 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |