Marco Cecchinato and Jacopo Vasami will play each other in the semifinal of the Milan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 3:30 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jacopo Vasami who should win in 3 sets.
Jacopo Vasami -> 1.77
Marco Cecchinato -> 1.96
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Marco Cecchinato vs. Jacopo Vasami
There is no head to head record between Marco Cecchinato and Jacopo Vasami since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Marco Cecchinato
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-34 | 0-0 | 39-34 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-25 | 0-2 | 26-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 13-23 | 1-4 | 12-17 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-33 | 0-3 | 43-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-27 | 1-5 | 31-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 437, the Italian got to the semifinal after defeating Max Alcala Gurri 6-4 6-1, Frederico Ferreira Silva 6-3 6-0 and Max Houkes 6-4 6-2
.In the quarter, Marco had a good straight sets win against Houkes (6-4 6-2). During the match, Cecchinato scored 65 points vs Houkes’s 43. Cecchinato was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cecchinato scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and he committed only 3 double faults. Marco Cecchinato was very effective on serve to win 87% (26/30) of his 1st serve and 73% (11/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Italian broke Houkes 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Italian hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to win 59% of the points he played.
Cecchinato has good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (295-255). 19-18 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Cecchinato has an overall 278-191 match record in the last years on clay.
Marco’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Kigali 1 Challenger.
Cecchinato has an aggregate 19-18 win-loss record in 2025, 19-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Milan Challenger
Jacopo Vasami
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 12-11 | 0-1 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 857, the Italian reached the semifinal after defeating Andres Santamarta Roig 6-3 7-5, Mili Poljicak 3-6 6-1 7-5 and Luka Mikrut 3-6 7-6(4) 6-2.
In the quarter against Mikrut, The Italian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-64 6-2). During the match Vasami scored 90 points vs Mikrut’s 89. Vasami was pretty aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Vasami blasted 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Jacopo Vasami was very efficient on serve to win 73% (38/52) of his 1st serve and 61% (25/41) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Vasami was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Mikrut twice.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jacopo has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
The Italian has an aggregate 10-7 win-loss record in 2025, 10-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Milan Challenger
Vasami has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cecchinato | Vasami |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 50 | 79 |
| Pts | 191-132 | 250-233 |
| Total Points | 323 | 483 |
| Winners | 70 | 86 |
| %Winners | 37% | 34% |
Both Cecchinato and Vasami played 3 matches. At the moment, Jacopo Vasami dropped 2 sets while Marco Cecchinato hasn’t lost a set so far. Cecchinato has played 2 set(s) less than Vasami (6 vs 8). Therefore, Cecchinato played 29 games less than Vasami. Cecchinato scored 70 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Jacopo scored 86 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cecchinato | Vasami |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 19 |
| Avg per match | 2.3 | 6.3 |
| 1st in | 89/159 | 116/253 |
| %1st in | 56% | 46% |
| 1st pts | 70/89 | 86/116 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 45/70 | 83/137 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 61% |
Cecchinato scored 7 aces (2.3 per match). Vasami fired 19 aces (6.3 per match). Cecchinato won 79% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Vasami won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cecchinato | Vasami |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 9 |
| Converted | 10/21 | 9/18 |
| % Converted | 48% | 50% |
| Conceded | 7 | 14 |
| Saved | 7 | 10 |
| % Saved | 100% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
The Italian broke his opponents 10 times with a 48% conversion rate. The Italian quite strong on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 7 break points. The Italian broke his opponents 9 times with a 50% conversion rate. Jacopo conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cecchinato | |||||
| R1 Alcala | R2 Ferreira Silva | 1/4 Houkes | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 6-3 6-0 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 15 | 18 | 50 | |
| pts | 65-49 | 61-40 | 65-43 | 191-132 | |
| Total points | 114 | 101 | 108 | 323 | |
| Winners | 24 | 20 | 26 | 70 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 33% | 40% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 4 | 1 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 30/53 | 29/61 | 30/45 | 89/159 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 48% | 67% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 20/29 | 26/30 | 70/89 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 69% | 87% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 20/32 | 11/15 | 45/70 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 63% | 73% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 10/21 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 40% | 60% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 4/4 | 2/2 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Vasami | |||||
| R1 Santamarta | R2 Poljicak | 1/4 Mikrut | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | 3-6 6-1 7-5 | 3-6 7-64 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 28 | 30 | 79 | |
| pts | 70-60 | 90-84 | 90-89 | 250-233 | |
| Total points | 130 | 174 | 179 | 483 | |
| Winners | 21 | 27 | 38 | 86 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | 42% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 5 | 10 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 7 | 2 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 27/70 | 37/90 | 52/93 | 116/253 | |
| % 1st in | 39% | 41% | 56% | 46% | |
| 1st pts | 21/27 | 27/37 | 38/52 | 86/116 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 73% | 73% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/43 | 32/53 | 25/41 | 83/137 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 2 | 9 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 4/10 | 2/2 | 9/18 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 40% | 100% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 | 4 | 14 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 2/4 | 3/4 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 50% | 75% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Milan Challenger
- Jacopo VasamiVasami – Luka MikrutMikrut (3-6 7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Max HoukesHoukes (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Christoph NegrituNegritu (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Rafael JodarJodar – Arthur GeaGea (6-0 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- George Goldhoff/Ray HoGoldhoff/Ray Ho – Jacopo Berrettini/Giovanni FonioBerrettini/Giovanni Fonio (6-3 6-74 10-8) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – (0-0) – H2H and prediction