Luka Pavlovic and Beibit Zhukayev will fight against each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on Court 10. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Beibit Zhukayev who should win in 5 sets.
Beibit Zhukayev -> 1.74
Luka Pavlovic -> 2.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Luka Pavlovic vs. Beibit Zhukayev
There is no head to head record between Luka Pavlovic and Beibit Zhukayev since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Luka Pavlovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-23 | 1-2 | 30-19 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 44-18 | 0-0 | 42-16 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-12 | 0-1 | 38-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 11-12 | 3-2 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-14 | 1-1 | 15-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 239, Luka got to the qualifications after beating Tristan Boyer 7-6(5) 7-6(2) and James Kent Trotter 6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(6).
In the qualifications, Pavlovic defeated Kent Trotter (6-3 6-75 7-66). During the match, Pavlovic scored 139 points vs Kent Trotter’s 133. Luka was very aggressive to blast 62 winners.
Regarding the service games, Pavlovic blasted 16 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Luka Pavlovic conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 17 break points. Furthermore, Pavlovic put 60% of his first serves in, winning 70% (62/89) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (35/60) on the 2nd serve. Luka broke Kent Trotter twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Pavlovic started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has lost 1 set in this event to conquer 51% of the points he played.
Pavlovic has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (221-138). 2-0 on grass in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Pavlovic has a composed 2-0 win-loss record in the last years on grass.
Pavlovic’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Mexico City Challenger.
The French player has a compiled 23-12 win-loss record in 2025, 2-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
Beibit Zhukayev
16 - 17win/loss
283
171
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-30 | 11-12 | 0-5 | 12-10 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 30-29 | 14-16 | 6-4 | 4-5 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-30 | 19-16 | 1-3 | 11-8 | 2-2 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 43-30 | 33-21 | 1-2 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 13-10 | 4-9 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 251, Beibit got to the qualifications after defeating Vitaliy Sachko 7-5 4-6 7-6(3) and Yannick Hanfmann 7-6(7) 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Kazakhstani had a good straight sets win against Hanfmann (7-67 6-3). During the match Zhukayev scored 70 points vs Hanfmann’s 56. The Kazakhstani was extremely aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Zhukayev bagged 19 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Beibit Zhukayev was quite efficient on serve to win 88% (37/42) of his 1st serve and 70% (14/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Kazakhstani broke Hanfmann once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Kazakhstani started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Beibit’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Morelia Challenger.
Beibit has an overall 15-17 win-loss record in 2025, 3-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pavlovic | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 61 | 57 |
| Pts | 228-215 | 180-157 |
| Total Points | 443 | 337 |
| Winners | 100 | 92 |
| %Winners | 44% | 51% |
Both Pavlovic and Zhukayev played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Luka Pavlovic lost 1 set, while Beibit Zhukayev lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Pavlovic and Zhukayev have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Pavlovic played 4 games more than Zhukayev. Pavlovic scored 100 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Beibit recorded 92 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pavlovic | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 24 | 40 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 20 |
| 1st in | 142/234 | 114/167 |
| %1st in | 61% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 100/142 | 92/114 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 56/92 | 31/53 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 58% |
Pavlovic scored 24 aces (12 per match). Zhukayev fired 40 aces (20 per match). Pavlovic won 70% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Zhukayev won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pavlovic | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/11 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 27% | 57% |
| Conceded | 22 | 8 |
| Saved | 21 | 5 |
| % Saved | 95% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
The French player broke his opponents 3 times with a 27% conversion rate. Luka lost his serve once and he saved 95% of the break points that he conceded. Beibit broke his opponents 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Zhukayev conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Pavlovic | ||||
| Q1 Boyer | Q2 Kent | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 7-62 | 6-3 6-75 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 35 | 61 | |
| pts | 89-82 | 139-133 | 228-215 | |
| Total points | 171 | 272 | 443 | |
| Winners | 38 | 62 | 100 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 45% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 16 | 24 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 53/85 | 89/149 | 142/234 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 60% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 38/53 | 62/89 | 100/142 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/32 | 35/60 | 56/92 | |
| % 2nd pts | 66% | 58% | 61% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Converted | 1/5 | 2/6 | 3/11 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 33% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 17 | 22 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 17/17 | 21 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 100% | 90% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Zhukayev | ||||
| Q1 Sachko | Q2 Hanfmann | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 4-6 7-63 | 7-67 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 22 | 57 | |
| pts | 110-101 | 70-56 | 180-157 | |
| Total points | 211 | 126 | 337 | |
| Winners | 55 | 37 | 92 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 53% | 51% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 21 | 19 | 40 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 1 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 72/105 | 42/62 | 114/167 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 55/72 | 37/42 | 92/114 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 88% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/33 | 14/20 | 31/53 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 70% | 58% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 1/2 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 50% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 2 | 8 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 2/2 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 100% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Alexander BlockxBlockx – Timofey SkatovSkatov (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Paul JubbJubb (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (3-6 7-68 7-69) – See score progression
- Leandro RiediRiedi – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (4-6 6-3 7-68) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Oliver BondingBonding (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Dominic StrickerStricker – Emilio NavaNava (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong (7-61 7-63) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri (7-65 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-3 6-75 7-66) – See score progression
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (4-6 7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Cristian GarinGarin – Hady HabibHabib (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Jaime FariaFaria – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Hamish StewartStewart – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (7-63 4-6 7-69) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Vilius GaubasGaubas (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Colton SmithSmith (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (7-67 6-3) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Oliver TarvetTarvet – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Henrique RochaRocha (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Chris RodeschRodesch – Mark LajalLajal (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Taro DanielDaniel (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Jozef KovalikKovalik (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Ryan PenistonPeniston (3-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Arthur BouquierBouquier (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Chris RodeschRodesch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex BoltBolt – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian GarinGarin – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Nicolas JarryJarry (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hamish StewartStewart – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-1) – H2H and prediction