Taylor Townsend and Celine Naef will clash against each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:00 pm on Court 14. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Taylor Townsend who should win in 3 sets.
Taylor Townsend -> 1.82
Celine Naef -> 1.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Taylor Townsend vs. Celine Naef
There is no head to head record between Taylor Townsend and Celine Naef since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Taylor Townsend
9 - 10win/loss
96
46
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 10-11 | 5-6 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
2024 | 24-20 | 21-13 | 2-4 | 1-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 32-16 | 16-9 | 12-4 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 23-8 | 14-5 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 98, Townsend got to the qualifications after beating Louisa Chirico 6-4 6-2 and Hina Inoue 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, Townsend had a good straight sets win against Inoue (6-3 6-1). During the match, Townsend scored 64 points vs Inoue’s 45. Townsend was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Townsend struck 2 aces and she was pretty steady in conceding no double faults. Taylor Townsend was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 71% (27/38) of her 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Inoue 4 times after converting 57% of her break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Townsend started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to win 59% of the points she played.
Townsend has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 64% of her matches (232-132). 2-0 on grass in 2025. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Townsend has an aggregate 7-10 match record in the last years on grass.
Taylor has a composed 9-10 win-loss record in 2025, 2-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Celine Naef
17 - 11win/loss
167
121
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 17-13 | 0-2 | 3-5 | 7-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
2024 | 39-28 | 4-5 | 3-5 | 30-13 | 1-4 | 1-1 |
2023 | 41-19 | 5-3 | 12-6 | 19-8 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 23-6 | 7-1 | 2-3 | 14-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 178, the Swiss reached the qualifications after defeating Chloe Paquet 6-4 4-6 6-4 and Mariam Bolkvadze 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications, Celine had a good straight sets win against Bolkvadze (6-1 6-1). During the match Naef scored 55 points vs Bolkvadze’s 26. Naef was very aggressive to blast 18 winners.
About the serving games, Naef scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Celine Naef was pretty efficient on serve to win 86% (18/21) of her 1st serve and 67% (10/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Naef broke Bolkvadze 5 times after converting 83% of her break points (5/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Swiss started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points she played.
Naef’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the W75 Trnava and the Ilkley.
Naef has a composed 17-11 win-loss record in 2025, 7-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2023. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Townsend | Naef |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
Tot Games | 34 | 44 |
Pts | 125-88 | 157-126 |
Total Points | 213 | 283 |
Winners | 53 | 55 |
%Winners | 42% | 35% |
Both Townsend and Naef played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Celine Naef lost 1 set while Taylor Townsend hasn’t conceded a set so far. Townsend has played 1 set(s) less than Naef (4 vs 5). Therefore, Townsend played 10 games less than Naef. Taylor scored 53 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Naef blasted 55 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Townsend | Naef |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 5 |
Avg per match | 2 | 2.5 |
1st in | 71/109 | 81/134 |
%1st in | 65% | 60% |
1st pts | 53/71 | 55/81 |
%1st pts | 75% | 68% |
2nd pts | 23/38 | 30/53 |
%2nd pts | 61% | 57% |
Townsend bagged 4 aces (2 per match). Naef blasted 5 aces (2.5 per match). Townsend won 75% points on her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Naef won 68% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Townsend | Naef |
---|---|---|
Won | 8 | 10 |
Converted | 8/13 | 10/22 |
% Converted | 62% | 45% |
Conceded | 7 | 12 |
Saved | 6 | 8 |
% Saved | 86% | 67% |
Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
The American broke her opponents 8 times with a 62% conversion rate. Townsend dropped her serve once and she saved 86% of the break points that she conceded. The Swiss broke her opponents 10 times with a 45% conversion rate. Naef conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
Townsend | ||||
Q1 Chirico | Q2 Inoue | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 16 | 34 | |
pts | 61-43 | 64-45 | 125-88 | |
Total points | 104 | 109 | 213 | |
Winners | 26 | 27 | 53 | |
%Winners | 43% | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
1st in | 33/50 | 38/59 | 71/109 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 64% | 65% | |
1st pts | 26/33 | 27/38 | 53/71 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 71% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 10/17 | 13/21 | 23/38 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 62% | 61% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 4/7 | 8/13 | |
Converted % | 67% | 57% | 62% | |
Conceded | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 3/3 | 6 | |
Saved % | 75% | 100% | 88% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Naef | ||||
Q1 Paquet | Q2 Bolkvadze | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 14 | 44 | |
pts | 102-100 | 55-26 | 157-126 | |
Total points | 202 | 81 | 283 | |
Winners | 37 | 18 | 55 | |
%Winners | 36% | 33% | 35% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
1st in | 60/98 | 21/36 | 81/134 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 58% | 60% | |
1st pts | 37/60 | 18/21 | 55/81 | |
% 1st pts | 62% | 86% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 20/38 | 10/15 | 30/53 | |
% 2nd pts | 53% | 67% | 57% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
Converted | 5/16 | 5/6 | 10/22 | |
Converted % | 31% | 83% | 45% | |
Conceded | 12 | 0 | 12 | |
Saved | 8/12 | 0/0 | 8 | |
Saved % | 67% | – | 34% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 0 | 4 |
Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Kristjan TammTamm – Timur MaulenovMaulenov (6-0 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dostanbek TashbulatovTashbulatov – Aliaksandr LiaonenkaLiaonenka (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas LiskaLiska – Federico CampanaCampana (6-0 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Fabio CoelhoCoelho – Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko (3-6 6-4 10-7) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dmytro KamyninKamynin – Aleksei KhomichKhomich (6-2 4-6 10-7) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nikita MashtakovMashtakov – Vladyslav LobakLobak (6-3 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Vladyslav GorodynskyiGorodynskyi – Piotr MatuszewskiMatuszewski (2-6 7-65 15-13) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Mateusz TerczynskiTerczynski (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Carson BranstineBranstine – Raluca Georgiana SerbanGeorgiana Serban (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia ZakharovaZakharova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Veronika ErjavecErjavec – Emily AppletonAppleton (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Petra MarticMartic – Panna UdvardyUdvardy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nina StojanovicStojanovic – Joanna GarlandGarland (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elsa JacquemotJacquemot – Alize CornetCornet (0-0) – H2H and prediction