Oliver Bonding and Juan Pablo Ficovich will square off in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on Court 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Juan Pablo Ficovich who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Juan Pablo Ficovich is the pick to win this match.
Juan Pablo Ficovich -> 1.33
Oliver Bonding -> 3.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Oliver Bonding vs. Juan Pablo Ficovich
There is no head to head record between Oliver Bonding and Juan Pablo Ficovich since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Oliver Bonding
8 - 8win/loss
862
816
LWWWLLLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 13-15 | 7-9 | 0-1 | 5-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 1-5 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, the Brit got to the qualifications after defeating Viktor Durasovic 7-5 2-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Oliver defeated Durasovic (7-5 2-6 6-4).During the match, Bonding scored less points (1) than Durasovic. In fact, the world no. won 94 points vs Durasovic’s. That means that Bonding was more focused during the important points. Bonding was quite aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Regarding the service games, Bonding recorded 12 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Oliver Bonding was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 76% (41/54) of his 1st serve and 56% (19/34) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Bonding broke Durasovic twice after converting 20% of his break points (2/10).
Bonding has a unfavourable match record in the last 2 years having won 41% of his matches (9-13). 1-1 on grass in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Bonding has an aggregate1-2 record in the last 2 years on grass.
The Brit’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Lannion.
Oliver has an aggregate 8-8 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Bonding has never competed in this tournament before.
Juan Pablo Ficovich
22 - 19win/loss
161
125
LWWWLLLWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-34 | 11-9 | 24-22 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-33 | 5-7 | 36-22 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-33 | 15-13 | 11-18 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-32 | 6-11 | 23-15 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-16 | 2-3 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 156, Juan got to the qualifications after defeating Carlos Taberner 7-6(0) 6-3.
In the qualifications, Pablo Ficovich had a good straight sets win against Taberner (7-60 6-3). During the match Pablo Ficovich scored 76 points vs Taberner’s 60. Pablo Ficovich was very aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Pablo Ficovich managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Juan Pablo Ficovich lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Pablo Ficovich put 71% of his first serves in, winning 84% (37/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (7/18) on the 2nd serve. Pablo Ficovich broke Taberner 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Pablo Ficovich’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Cordoba Challenger and the Merida Challenger.
Juan has a composed 22-19 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Bonding | Pablo Ficovich |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 22 |
| Pts | 94-95 | 76-60 |
| Total Points | 189 | 136 |
| Winners | 41 | 37 |
| %Winners | 44% | 49% |
Both Bonding and Pablo Ficovich played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Oliver Bonding surrendered 1 set while Juan Pablo Ficovich hasn’t dropped a set so far. Bonding has played 1 set more than Pablo Ficovich (3 vs 2). Therefore, Bonding played 8 games more than Pablo Ficovich. Bonding scored 41 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The Argentine managed to score 37 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Bonding | Pablo Ficovich |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 4 |
| 1st in | 54/88 | 44/62 |
| %1st in | 61% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 41/54 | 37/44 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 19/34 | 7/18 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 39% |
Bonding scored 12 aces . Pablo Ficovich made 4 aces . Bonding won 76% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Pablo Ficovich won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 39% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Bonding | Pablo Ficovich |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/10 | 3/6 |
| % Converted | 20% | 50% |
| Conceded | 7 | 3 |
| Saved | 5 | 2 |
| % Saved | 71% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Oliver broke his opponent twice with a 20% conversion rate. Oliver surrendered his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. The Argentine broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Juan conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Bonding | |||
| Q1 Durasovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 2-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 94-95 | 94-95 | |
| Total points | 189 | 189 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 54/88 | 54/88 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 41/54 | 41/54 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/34 | 19/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/10 | 2/10 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Pablo Ficovich | |||
| Q1 Taberner |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-60 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 76-60 | 76-60 | |
| Total points | 136 | 136 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 44/62 | 44/62 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 37/44 | 37/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/18 | 7/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLLLLWL
LWWWLLLWLL Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Sumit NagalNagal (6-2 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Hugo GrenierGrenier (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Tristan BoyerBoyer (7-65 7-62) – See score progression
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Maximilian MartererMarterer (6-1 6-75 6-1) – See score progression
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (4-6 6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Ignacio BuseBuse (6-2 6-711 6-1) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Facundo BagnisBagnis (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Giles HusseyHussey (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Jerome KymKym (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Pavel KotovKotov (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (6-3 0-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Leandro RiediRiedi – Fajing SunSun (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (7-5 4-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (6-4 6-75 7-67) – See score progression
- Hamish StewartStewart – Valentin VacherotVacherot (4-6 5-6 ret.) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Francesco PassaroPassaro (6-2 3-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Guy Den OudenDen Ouden (3-6 6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – James StoryStory (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Carlos TabernerTaberner (7-60 6-3) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Jaime FariaFaria – Zsombor PirosPiros (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Cristian GarinGarin – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Daniel RinconRincon (7-5 7-65) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (7-67 6-0) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (7-69 6-6 ret.) – See score progression
- Oliver TarvetTarvet – Terence AtmaneAtmane (6-1 7-62) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Andrea CollariniCollarini (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer – Yan BaiBai (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas (7-64 6-76 6-4) – See score progression
- Henrique RochaRocha – Murkel DellienDellien (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Murphy CassoneCassone (6-4 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Harold MayotMayot (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Colton SmithSmith – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Hady HabibHabib – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (4-6 6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (2-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Borna GojoGojo (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Dominic StrickerStricker – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (6-74 6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-66 7-63) – See score progression
- Oliver BondingBonding – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (7-5 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (6-72 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur BouquierBouquier – Alastair GrayGray (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Liam DraxlDraxl (3-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Calvin HemeryHemery (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexander BlockxBlockx – Facundo MenaMena (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Omar JasikaJasika (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Aziz DougazDougaz (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Constant LestienneLestienne (6-2 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Chris RodeschRodesch – Matteo GiganteGigante (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Edas ButvilasButvilas (7-68 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Nicolas JarryJarry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christian GarinGarin – Hady HabibHabib (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Lukas KleinKlein (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur BouquierBouquier – Dusan LajovicLajovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
