Nikoloz Basilashvili and Chak Lam Coleman Wong will square off in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on Court 6. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nikoloz Basilashvili who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nikoloz Basilashvili is the pick to win this match.
Nikoloz Basilashvili -> 1.75
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.03
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Nikoloz Basilashvili vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong
There is no head to head record between Nikoloz Basilashvili and Chak Lam Coleman Wong since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Nikoloz Basilashvili
23 - 17win/loss
126
16
LWWWWLLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26-18 | 7-6 | 8-7 | 6-2 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 51-32 | 11-8 | 27-15 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 4-19 | 1-8 | 0-5 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 16-31 | 3-11 | 5-9 | 4-7 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-27 | 18-11 | 8-8 | 3-5 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 128, the Georgean reached the qualifications after defeating Pablo Llamas Ruiz 6-3 4-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Georgean defeated Llamas Ruiz (6-3 4-6 6-3). During the match, Basilashvili scored 84 points vs Llamas Ruiz’s 76. Nikoloz was exceptionally aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Basilashvili bagged 8 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Nikoloz Basilashvili was quite effective on serve to win 74% (37/50) of his 1st serve and 60% (15/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Basilashvili broke Llamas Ruiz 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Basilashvili has positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 51% of his matches (267-259). 2-2 on grass in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Basilashvili has an overall 19-24 record in the last years on grass.
Basilashvili’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Bordeaux Challenger.
Nikoloz has an overall 23-17 win-loss record in 2025, 2-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
15 - 17win/loss
172
128
LWLWLLWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 15-18 | 6-8 | 2-5 | 1-1 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 172, Chak reached the qualifications after beating Pol Martin Tiffon 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Lam Coleman Wong had a good straight sets win against Martin Tiffon (6-3 6-4). During the match Lam Coleman Wong scored 76 points vs Martin Tiffon’s 60. Lam Coleman Wong was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Lam Coleman Wong fired 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Chak Lam Coleman Wong was extremely effective on serve to win 74% (28/38) of his 1st serve and 68% (17/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Lam Coleman Wong broke Martin Tiffon twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Chak has an overall 15-17 win-loss record in 2025, 6-3 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Basilashvili | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 19 |
| Pts | 84-76 | 76-60 |
| Total Points | 160 | 136 |
| Winners | 37 | 28 |
| %Winners | 44% | 37% |
Both Basilashvili and Lam Coleman Wong played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Nikoloz Basilashvili dropped 1 set while Chak Lam Coleman Wong hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Basilashvili has played 1 set more than Lam Coleman Wong (3 vs 2). Therefore, Basilashvili played 9 games more than Lam Coleman Wong. Basilashvili scored 37 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Chak recorded 28 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Basilashvili | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 10 |
| 1st in | 50/75 | 38/63 |
| %1st in | 67% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 37/50 | 28/38 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 17/25 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 68% |
Basilashvili struck 8 aces . Lam Coleman Wong managed to score 10 aces . Basilashvili won 74% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Basilashvili | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/13 | 2/7 |
| % Converted | 31% | 29% |
| Conceded | 7 | 1 |
| Saved | 5 | 1 |
| % Saved | 71% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Basilashvili broke his opponent 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. The Georgean lost his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Chak broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. The was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Basilashvili | |||
| Q1 Llamas |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 84-76 | 84-76 | |
| Total points | 160 | 160 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 50/75 | 50/75 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 37/50 | 37/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 15/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/13 | 4/13 | |
| Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| Q1 Martin Tiffon |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 76-60 | 76-60 | |
| Total points | 136 | 136 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 38/63 | 38/63 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 28/38 | 28/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/25 | 17/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLLWLW
LWLWLLWWWW Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Constant LestienneLestienne (6-2 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Edas ButvilasButvilas (7-68 6-3) – See score progression
- Chris RodeschRodesch – Matteo GiganteGigante (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Sumit NagalNagal (6-2 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Hugo GrenierGrenier (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Tristan BoyerBoyer (7-65 7-62) – See score progression
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Maximilian MartererMarterer (6-1 6-75 6-1) – See score progression
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (4-6 6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Ignacio BuseBuse (6-2 6-711 6-1) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Facundo BagnisBagnis (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Giles HusseyHussey (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Jerome KymKym (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Pavel KotovKotov (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (6-3 0-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Leandro RiediRiedi – Fajing SunSun (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (7-5 4-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (6-4 6-75 7-67) – See score progression
- Hamish StewartStewart – Valentin VacherotVacherot (4-6 5-6 ret.) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Francesco PassaroPassaro (6-2 3-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Guy Den OudenDen Ouden (3-6 6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – James StoryStory (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Carlos TabernerTaberner (7-60 6-3) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Jaime FariaFaria – Zsombor PirosPiros (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Cristian GarinGarin – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Daniel RinconRincon (7-5 7-65) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (7-67 6-0) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (7-69 6-6 ret.) – See score progression
- Oliver TarvetTarvet – Terence AtmaneAtmane (6-1 7-62) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Andrea CollariniCollarini (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer – Yan BaiBai (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas (7-64 6-76 6-4) – See score progression
- Henrique RochaRocha – Murkel DellienDellien (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Murphy CassoneCassone (6-4 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Harold MayotMayot (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Hady HabibHabib – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (4-6 6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Colton SmithSmith – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (2-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Borna GojoGojo (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Dominic StrickerStricker – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (6-74 6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-66 7-63) – See score progression
- Oliver BondingBonding – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (7-5 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (6-72 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur BouquierBouquier – Alastair GrayGray (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Liam DraxlDraxl (3-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Calvin HemeryHemery (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexander BlockxBlockx – Facundo MenaMena (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Aziz DougazDougaz (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Omar JasikaJasika (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Nicolas JarryJarry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christian GarinGarin – Hady HabibHabib (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Lukas KleinKlein (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur BouquierBouquier – Dusan LajovicLajovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
