
Thomas Faurel and Max Houkes will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Milan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on COURT 10. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Thomas Faurel who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Thomas Faurel is the pick to win this match.
Thomas Faurel -> 1.8
Max Houkes -> 1.93
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Thomas Faurel vs. Max Houkes
There is no head to head record between Thomas Faurel and Max Houkes since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Thomas Faurel

24 - 13win/loss
518
517
WWWWWLWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 50-29 | 11-4 | 39-24 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 5-12 | 0-1 | 4-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, the French player reached the 2nd round after beating Mateus Alves 6-4 7-5, Matthew Dellavedova 6-2 6-0 and Federico Bondioli 6-3 2-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, Faurel defeated Bondioli (6-3 2-6 6-2). During the match, Faurel scored 78 points vs Bondioli’s 73. The French player was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Faurel recorded 2 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Thomas Faurel lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Faurel put 59% of his first serves in, winning 67% (32/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (15/34) on the 2nd serve. Faurel broke Bondioli 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Faurel has a winning win-loss record in the last 3 years having won 51% of his matches (30-29). 20-11 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Faurel has an aggregate24-23 match record in the last 3 years on clay.
Thomas’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M15 Antalya.
Thomas has an overall 24-13 win-loss record in 2025, 20-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Milan Challenger
Faurel has never competed in this tournament before.
Max Houkes
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 53-33 | 9-4 | 44-27 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 44-17 | 0-0 | 44-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-33 | 1-1 | 39-30 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 70-20 | 0-0 | 70-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-16 | 2-2 | 30-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 256, the Dutch reached the 2nd round after defeating Giovanni Fonio 3-6 6-3 7-6(5).
In the 1st round against Fonio, Houkes recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 7-65). During the match Houkes scored 114 points vs Fonio’s 109. Houkes was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Houkes blasted 6 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Max Houkes lost the serve twice and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Houkes put 56% of his first serves in, winning 62% (38/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 64% (30/47) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Fonio twice after converting 17% of his break points (2/12).
Max’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
The Dutch has an aggregate 22-17 win-loss record in 2025, 22-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Faurel | Houkes |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 61 | 31 |
| Pts | 211-158 | 114-109 |
| Total Points | 369 | 223 |
| Winners | 76 | 38 |
| %Winners | 36% | 33% |
Faurel played 3 matches while Houkes competed in 1 match. Faurel started his run from the qualifications while Houkes had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Thomas Faurel lost 1 set, while Max Houkes conceded 1 set. Faurel has played 4 sets more than Houkes (7 vs 3). Therefore, Faurel played 30 games more than Houkes. Thomas scored 76 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Houkes scored 38 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Faurel | Houkes |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 1.3 | 6 |
| 1st in | 110/178 | 61/108 |
| %1st in | 62% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 76/110 | 38/61 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 62% |
| 2nd pts | 38/68 | 30/47 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 64% |
Faurel managed to score 4 aces (1.3 per match). Houkes recorded 6 aces . Faurel won 69% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Houkes won 62% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Faurel | Houkes |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 15 | 2 |
| Converted | 15/23 | 2/12 |
| % Converted | 65% | 17% |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 |
| Saved | 6 | 11 |
| % Saved | 46% | 85% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 2 |
Faurel broke his opponents 15 times with a 65% conversion rate. Thomas lost his serve 7 times and he saved 46% of the break points that he conceded. Houkes broke his opponent twice with a 17% conversion rate. Max conceded his serve twice and he saved 85% of the break points that he conceded.
| Faurel | |||||
| Q1 Alves |
Q3 Dellavedova |
R1 Bondioli |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | 6-2 6-0 | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 14 | 25 | 61 | |
| pts | 79-64 | 54-21 | 78-73 | 211-158 | |
| Total points | 143 | 75 | 151 | 369 | |
| Winners | 26 | 18 | 32 | 76 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | 41% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 6 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 38/61 | 24/35 | 48/82 | 110/178 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 69% | 59% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 26/38 | 18/24 | 32/48 | 76/110 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 75% | 67% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 8/11 | 15/34 | 38/68 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 73% | 44% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 5 | 15 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 6/9 | 5/6 | 15/23 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 67% | 83% | 65% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 | 7 | 13 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 1/2 | 3/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | 43% | 48% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 | |
| Houkes | |||||
| R1 Fonio |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-3 7-65 | ||||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |||
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |||
| pts | 114-109 | 114-109 | |||
| Total points | 223 | 223 | |||
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |||
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |||
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |||
| 1st in | 61/108 | 61/108 | |||
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |||
| 1st pts | 38/61 | 38/61 | |||
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |||
| 2nd pts | 30/47 | 30/47 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |||
| Converted | 2/12 | 2/12 | |||
| Converted % | 17% | 17% | |||
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |||
| Saved | 11/13 | 11 | |||
| Saved % | 85% | 28% | |||
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |||
Head 2 Head
WWWWWLWWLL
LWWWWLWWWW Tennis Scores in Milan Challenger
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez (4-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Mili PoljicakPoljicak – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (6-2 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Mathys ErhardErhard (2-6 7-67 6-4) – See score progression
- Jacopo VasamiVasami – Andres Santamarta RoigSantamarta Roig (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini – Henri SquireSquire (7-65 ret.) – See score progression
- Max HoukesHoukes – Giovanni FonioFonio (3-6 6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Thomas FaurelFaurel – Federico BondioliBondioli (6-3 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Tiago PereiraPereira – Matias SotoSoto (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Alexey VatutinVatutin (6-3 1-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Gabriele PirainoPiraino (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Rafael JodarJodar – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Andrej MartinMartin (3-6 6-1 7-63) – See score progression
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Radu AlbotAlbot (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur GeaGea – Diego Dedura-PalomeroDedura-Palomero (7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Luka MikrutMikrut – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Mathys ErhardErhard (2-6 7-6(7) 6-4) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Alexey VatutinVatutin (6-3 1-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Thomas FaurelFaurel – Federico BondioliBondioli (6-3 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Max HoukesHoukes – Giovanni FonioFonio (3-6 6-3 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Jacopo VasamiVasami – Andres Santamarta RoigSantamarta Roig (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Ivan GakhovGakhov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – (1-1) – H2H and prediction










