Emilio Nava and Dominic Stricker will clash against each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on Court18. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Nava who should win in 3 sets.
Emilio Nava -> 1.78
Dominic Stricker -> 1.99
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Emilio Nava vs. Dominic Stricker
This will be the 2nd time that Emilio Nava and Dominic Stricker clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Stricker (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they competed against each other, Stricker won 3-6 6-3 6-4 in the 2nd round in the Cleveland Challenger back in 2022.
Emilio Nava
39 - 17win/loss
88
88
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 56-28 | 8-7 | 45-19 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 34-34 | 16-15 | 8-9 | 8-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 119 (career-high), Nava got to the qualifications after defeating Mitchell Krueger 7-6(6) 7-6(3).
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Krueger (7-66 7-63). During the match, Nava scored 80 points vs Krueger’s 76. Emilio was very aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nava submerged his opponent with 21 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Emilio Nava was extremely efficient on serve to win 83% (43/52) of his 1st serve and 57% (16/28) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match.
Nava has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 60% of his matches (226-151). 3-1 on grass in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Nava has a compiled5-6 record in the last 8 years on grass.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Asuncion Challenger where he overcame Thiago Moura Monteiro in the final 7-5 6-3 and the Concepcion Challenger where he defeated Nicolas Kicker in the final 6-1 7-6(3) and the Sarasota Challenger where he beat Liam Draxl in the final 6-2 7-6(2).
Nava has an aggregate 39-17 win-loss record in 2025, 3-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Dominic Stricker
15 - 13win/loss
373
88
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21-21 | 0-5 | 11-9 | 4-5 | 2-1 | 4-1 |
| 2024 | 12-15 | 7-6 | 0-2 | 4-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-25 | 8-3 | 8-5 | 14-13 | 6-3 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 37-25 | 2-5 | 8-7 | 22-10 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-19 | 0-1 | 6-7 | 14-7 | 2-2 | 4-2 |
Ranked no. 244, the Swiss reached the qualifications after defeating Saba Purtseladze 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Swiss had a good straight sets win against Purtseladze (6-3 6-2). During the match Stricker scored 64 points vs Purtseladze’s 39. The Swiss was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Stricker managed to score 7 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Dominic Stricker lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Stricker put 81% of his first serves in, winning 76% (26/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (4/8) on the 2nd serve. Dominic broke Purtseladze 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Stricker’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Trimbach and M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
The Swiss has an overall 15-13 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nava | Stricker |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 17 |
| Pts | 80-76 | 64-39 |
| Total Points | 156 | 103 |
| Winners | 43 | 26 |
| %Winners | 54% | 41% |
Both Nava and Stricker played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Nava and Stricker have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Nava played 9 games more than Stricker. Emilio scored 43 winners (54% of the total points). On the other side, Dominic scored 26 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nava | Stricker |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 21 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 21 | 7 |
| 1st in | 52/80 | 34/42 |
| %1st in | 65% | 81% |
| 1st pts | 43/52 | 26/34 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 16/28 | 4/8 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 50% |
Nava bagged 21 aces . Stricker blasted 7 aces . Nava won 83% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Stricker won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nava | Stricker |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 0 | 5 |
| Converted | 0/0 | 5/13 |
| % Converted | 0% | 38% |
| Conceded | 1 | 3 |
| Saved | 1 | 1 |
| % Saved | 100% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The American hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Nava pretty effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points without even conceding a single break point. Stricker broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Stricker conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nava | |||
| Q1 Krueger | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 80-76 | 80-76 | |
| Total points | 156 | 156 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 54% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 21 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 52/80 | 52/80 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 43/52 | 43/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/28 | 16/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | 0 | |
| Converted | 0/0 | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Stricker | |||
| Q1 Purtseladze | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 64-39 | 64-39 | |
| Total points | 103 | 103 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 34/42 | 34/42 | |
| % 1st in | 81% | 81% | |
| 1st pts | 26/34 | 26/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Chris RodeschRodesch – Matteo GiganteGigante (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (4-6 6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Ignacio BuseBuse (6-2 6-711 6-1) – See score progression
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (7-69 6-6 ret.) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Andrea CollariniCollarini (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Oliver BondingBonding – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (7-5 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (6-72 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexander BlockxBlockx – Facundo MenaMena (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Aziz DougazDougaz (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Colton SmithSmith – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Oliver TarvetTarvet – Terence AtmaneAtmane (6-1 7-62) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Harold MayotMayot (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Hady HabibHabib – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (4-6 6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Guy Den OudenDen Ouden (3-6 6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (2-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Carlos TabernerTaberner (7-60 6-3) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – James StoryStory (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Jaime FariaFaria – Zsombor PirosPiros (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Daniel RinconRincon (7-5 7-65) – See score progression
- Cristian GarinGarin – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (7-67 6-0) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Murphy CassoneCassone (6-4 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur BouquierBouquier – Alastair GrayGray (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Calvin HemeryHemery (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (6-3 0-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Pavel KotovKotov (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Omar JasikaJasika (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (7-5 4-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Edas ButvilasButvilas (7-68 6-3) – See score progression
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Liam DraxlDraxl (3-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Sumit NagalNagal (6-2 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Tristan BoyerBoyer (7-65 7-62) – See score progression
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Borna GojoGojo (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Dominic StrickerStricker – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-66 7-63) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (6-74 6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Facundo BagnisBagnis (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Giles HusseyHussey (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Jerome KymKym (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer – Yan BaiBai (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Henrique RochaRocha – Murkel DellienDellien (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas (7-64 6-76 6-4) – See score progression
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Constant LestienneLestienne (6-2 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Leandro RiediRiedi – Fajing SunSun (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Hamish StewartStewart – Valentin VacherotVacherot (4-6 5-6 ret.) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (6-4 6-75 7-67) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Hugo GrenierGrenier (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Francesco PassaroPassaro (6-2 3-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Maximilian MartererMarterer (6-1 6-75 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Nicolas JarryJarry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christian GarinGarin – Hady HabibHabib (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Lukas KleinKlein (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur BouquierBouquier – Dusan LajovicLajovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-0) – H2H and prediction