
Jaime Faria and Jan Choinski will face off in the 2nd round of the Nottingham 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 2:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jan Choinski who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jan Choinski is the pick to win this match.
Jan Choinski -> 1.75
Jaime Faria -> 1.99
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jaime Faria vs. Jan Choinski
There is no head to head record between Jaime Faria and Jan Choinski since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Jaime Faria


11 - 12win/loss
119
87

Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 15-16 | 4-2 | 6-11 | 0-1 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
2024 | 53-25 | 24-5 | 27-14 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 49-31 | 33-17 | 16-12 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 43-24 | 20-12 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 11-10 | 6-6 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 119, the Portuguese reached the 2nd round after beating Brandon Holt 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Faria had a good straight sets win against Holt (6-3 6-4). During the match, Faria scored 72 points vs Holt’s 55. Jaime was very aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about the service games, Faria recorded 14 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Jaime Faria conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 8 break points. Furthermore, Faria put 65% of his first serves in, winning 85% (39/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (11/25) on the 2nd serve. The Portuguese broke Holt twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Faria has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 62% of his matches (168-103). 1-0 on grass in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Faria has an overall1-2 match record in the last 6 years on grass.
Faria has an overall 11-12 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 2 Challenger
Jaime has never competed in this tournament before.
Jan Choinski


11 - 14win/loss
149
126

Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 21-17 | 0-3 | 15-9 | 3-3 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
2024 | 33-33 | 4-4 | 24-16 | 5-9 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 41-35 | 1-4 | 30-19 | 5-5 | 2-5 | 3-2 |
2022 | 46-21 | 5-5 | 35-14 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 208, Choinski got to the 2nd round after beating Alibek Kachmazov 7-6(2) 6-7(4) 7-5, Paul Jubb 6-3 6-7(3) 6-1 and Eliot Spizzirri 5-7 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round against Spizzirri, Choinski recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-4 6-4). During the match Choinski scored 95 points vs Spizzirri’s 89. The Brit was pretty aggressive to blast 52 winners.
Talking about serving, Choinski blasted 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jan Choinski lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Choinski put 67% of his first serves in, winning 76% (52/68) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (16/34) on the 2nd serve. The Brit was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Spizzirri 3 times.
The Brit has an aggregate 11-14 win-loss record in 2025, 3-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 2 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Faria | Choinski |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 9 |
Tot Games | 19 | 99 |
Pts | 72-55 | 331-301 |
Total Points | 127 | 632 |
Winners | 39 | 159 |
%Winners | 54% | 48% |
Faria played 1 match while Choinski competed in 3 matches. Choinski started his run from the qualifications while Faria had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Jan Choinski lost 3 sets while Jaime Faria hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Faria has played 7 set(s) less than Choinski (2 vs 9). Therefore, Faria played 80 games less than Choinski. The Portuguese scored 39 winners (54% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit made 159 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Faria | Choinski |
---|---|---|
Aces | 14 | 22 |
Avg per match | 14 | 7.3 |
1st in | 46/71 | 212/331 |
%1st in | 65% | 64% |
1st pts | 39/46 | 159/212 |
%1st pts | 85% | 75% |
2nd pts | 11/25 | 62/119 |
%2nd pts | 44% | 52% |
Faria recorded 14 aces . Choinski fired 22 aces (7.3 per match). Faria won 85% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Choinski won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Faria | Choinski |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 9 |
Converted | 2/8 | 9/17 |
% Converted | 25% | 53% |
Conceded | 8 | 18 |
Saved | 8 | 14 |
% Saved | 100% | 78% |
Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
The Portuguese broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. The Portuguese had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 8 break points. The Brit broke his opponents 9 times with a 53% conversion rate. Choinski conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
Faria | |||
R1 Holt |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 72-55 | 72-55 | |
Total points | 127 | 127 | |
Winners | 39 | 39 | |
%Winners | 54% | 54% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 14 | 14 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 46/71 | 46/71 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 39/46 | 39/46 | |
% 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
2nd pts | 11/25 | 11/25 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
Saved | 8/8 | 8 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Choinski | |||||
Q1 Kachmazov |
Q3 Jubb |
R1 Spizzirri |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-62 6-74 7-5 | 6-3 6-73 6-1 | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 38 | 29 | 32 | 99 | |
pts | 127-119 | 109-93 | 95-89 | 331-301 | |
Total points | 246 | 202 | 184 | 632 | |
Winners | 54 | 53 | 52 | 159 | |
%Winners | 43% | 49% | 55% | 48% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 9 | 6 | 7 | 22 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 | |
1st in | 67/115 | 77/114 | 68/102 | 212/331 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 68% | 67% | 64% | |
1st pts | 54/67 | 53/77 | 52/68 | 159/212 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 69% | 76% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 27/48 | 19/37 | 16/34 | 62/119 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 51% | 47% | 52% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 | |
Converted | 2/7 | 4/7 | 3/3 | 9/17 | |
Converted % | 29% | 57% | 100% | 53% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | 6 | 18 | |
Saved | 5/6 | 5/6 | 4/6 | 14 | |
Saved % | 83% | 83% | 67% | 233% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
Head 2 Head



Tennis Scores in Nottingham 2 Challenger
- Colton SmithSmith – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (6-2 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Valentin RoyerRoyer (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Alexander BlockxBlockx (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Matteo GiganteGigante (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Marin CilicCilic – Hugo GrenierGrenier (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Arthur FeryFery – Fabio FogniniFognini (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer (6-2 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – George LoffhagenLoffhagen (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Jaime FariaFaria – Brandon HoltHolt (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (5-7 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Arthur CazauxCazaux (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Colton SmithSmith – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (6-2 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones (6-3 6-7(10) 6-3) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer (6-2 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Alexander BlockxBlockx (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Valentin RoyerRoyer (7-6(6) 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Marin CilicCilic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – (0-0) – H2H and prediction