
Terence Atmane and Arthur Fery will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Nottingham 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 6:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Terence Atmane who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Terence Atmane is the pick to win this match.
Terence Atmane -> 1.74
Arthur Fery -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Terence Atmane vs. Arthur Fery
There is no head to head record between Terence Atmane and Arthur Fery since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Terence Atmane


22 - 18win/loss
127
118

Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 23-21 | 18-11 | 2-3 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2024 | 39-32 | 30-20 | 5-5 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 54-27 | 26-10 | 26-15 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 78-30 | 71-23 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 23-22 | 23-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 123, Terence got to the 2nd round after defeating Matteo Gigante 4-6 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round against Gigante, Terence recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-4). During the match, Atmane scored 92 points vs Gigante’s 88. Atmane was extremely aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Regarding the service games, Atmane blasted 14 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Terence Atmane was extremely effective on serve to win 79% (44/56) of his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Terence broke Gigante twice after converting 15% of his break points (2/13).
Atmane has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 62% of his matches (226-141). 1-2 on grass in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Atmane has an aggregate3-6 record in the last 8 years on grass.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Busan Challenger where he defeated Adam Walton in the final 6-3 6-4 and the Guangzhou Challenger where he beat Tristan Schoolkate in the final 6-3 7-6(4).
Atmane has a compiled 22-18 win-loss record in 2025, 1-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 2 Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
Arthur Fery
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 17-4 | 3-0 | 0-0 | 10-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2024 | 18-14 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 34-15 | 17-4 | 0-0 | 15-6 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-13 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 14-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 16-14 | 7-6 | 7-4 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 481, Arthur reached the 2nd round after beating Kyrian Jacquet 6-2 6-1, Ugo Blanchet 2-6 6-3 6-3 and Fabio Fognini 6-3 7-6(5).
In the 1st round, Fery had a good straight sets win against Fognini (6-3 7-65). During the match Fery scored 75 points vs Fognini’s 63. Arthur was very aggressive to blast 36 winners.
About the serving games, Fery fired 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Arthur Fery lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Fery put 67% of his first serves in, winning 75% (36/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (11/24) on the 2nd serve. Fery was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Fognini 3 times.
The Brit’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Roehampton.
The Brit has a compiled 16-2 win-loss record in 2025, 3-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 2 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Atmane | Fery |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
Tot Games | 30 | 63 |
Pts | 92-88 | 231-181 |
Total Points | 180 | 412 |
Winners | 44 | 97 |
%Winners | 48% | 42% |
Atmane played 1 match while Fery competed in 3 matches. Fery started his run from the qualifications while Atmane had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Terence Atmane lost 1 set, while Arthur Fery surrendered 1 set. Atmane has played 4 set(s) less than Fery (3 vs 7). Therefore, Atmane played 33 games less than Fery. The French player scored 44 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Fery managed to score 97 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Atmane | Fery |
---|---|---|
Aces | 14 | 9 |
Avg per match | 14 | 3 |
1st in | 56/82 | 124/183 |
%1st in | 68% | 68% |
1st pts | 44/56 | 97/124 |
%1st pts | 79% | 78% |
2nd pts | 14/26 | 30/59 |
%2nd pts | 54% | 51% |
Atmane struck 14 aces . Fery scored 9 aces (3 per match). Atmane won 79% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Fery won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Atmane | Fery |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 12 |
Converted | 2/13 | 12/23 |
% Converted | 15% | 52% |
Conceded | 1 | 11 |
Saved | 0 | 6 |
% Saved | 0% | 55% |
Times Broken | 1 | 5 |
Atmane broke his opponent twice with a 15% conversion rate. Atmane conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponents 12 times with a 52% conversion rate. Arthur conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 55% of the break points that he conceded.
Atmane | |||
R1 Gigante |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
pts | 92-88 | 92-88 | |
Total points | 180 | 180 | |
Winners | 44 | 44 | |
%Winners | 48% | 48% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 14 | 14 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 56/82 | 56/82 | |
% 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
1st pts | 44/56 | 44/56 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 14/26 | 14/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/13 | 2/13 | |
Converted % | 15% | 15% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Fery | |||||
Q1 Jacquet |
Q3 Blanchet |
R1 Fognini |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-1 | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | 6-3 7-65 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 26 | 22 | 63 | |
pts | 68-45 | 88-73 | 75-63 | 231-181 | |
Total points | 113 | 161 | 138 | 412 | |
Winners | 20 | 41 | 36 | 97 | |
%Winners | 29% | 47% | 48% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 1 | 5 | 3 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
1st in | 23/33 | 53/78 | 48/72 | 124/183 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 68% | 67% | 68% | |
1st pts | 20/23 | 41/53 | 36/48 | 97/124 | |
% 1st pts | 87% | 77% | 75% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 8/10 | 11/25 | 11/24 | 30/59 | |
% 2nd pts | 80% | 44% | 46% | 51% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 4 | 3 | 12 | |
Converted | 5/15 | 4/5 | 3/3 | 12/23 | |
Converted % | 33% | 80% | 100% | 52% | |
Conceded | 0 | 7 | 4 | 11 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 4/7 | 2/4 | 6 | |
Saved % | – | 57% | 50% | 107% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Head 2 Head



Tennis Scores in Nottingham 2 Challenger
- James McCabeMcCabe – George LoffhagenLoffhagen (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jaime FariaFaria – Brandon HoltHolt (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur FeryFery – Fabio FogniniFognini (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Matteo GiganteGigante (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Marin CilicCilic – Hugo GrenierGrenier (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer (6-2 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (5-7 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Arthur CazauxCazaux (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – George LoffhagenLoffhagen (6-3 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Jaime FariaFaria – Brandon HoltHolt (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (6-4 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Matteo GiganteGigante (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur FeryFery – Fabio FogniniFognini (6-3 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marin CilicCilic – Hugo GrenierGrenier (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – (0-0) – H2H and prediction