Emma Navarro and Amanda Anisimova will square off in the quarter of the LTA London Championships for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 7:30 pm on ANDY MURRAY ARENA. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Amanda Anisimova who should win in 3 sets.
Amanda Anisimova -> 1.68
Emma Navarro -> 2.19
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Emma Navarro vs. Amanda Anisimova
This will be the 4th time that Emma Navarro and Amanda Anisimova clash against each other. The head to head is 3-0 for Anisimova (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they competed against each other, Anisimova won 7-5 7-6(1) in the quarter in Charleston back in April 2025.
Highlights Amanda Anisimova vs Emma Navarro – Charleston 04-April-2025
Emma Navarro
18 - 13win/loss
10
8
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 21-16 | 11-7 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2024 | 54-24 | 33-14 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 64-24 | 17-9 | 37-11 | 3-1 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 31-18 | 8-8 | 23-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-13 | 6-6 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 10, the American got to the quarter after defeating Beatriz Haddad Maia 1-6 7-6(4) 6-3.
In the 2nd round against Haddad Maia, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 7-64 6-3).During the match, Navarro scored less points (8) than Haddad Maia. In fact, the world no. 10 won 94 points vs Haddad Maia’s. That means that Navarro was more focused during the important points. The American was quite aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about the service games, Navarro couldn’t to score even 1 ace during the match and she committed only 4 double faults. Emma Navarro lost the serve 4 times and she saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Navarro put 65% of her first serves in, winning 55% (42/77) of the points behind her 1st serve and 61% (25/41) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Haddad Maia twice after converting 67% of her break points (2/3).
Navarro has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 64% of her matches (221-124). 1-0 on grass in 2025. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Navarro has a composed15-6 match record in the last 9 years on grass.
Her best result of the season was winning the title in Merida where she overcame Emiliana Arango in the final 6-0 6-0.
Navarro has an overall 18-13 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in London
Emma has never competed in this tournament before.
Amanda Anisimova
21 - 10win/loss
13
13
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 25-12 | 11-5 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 |
2024 | 21-13 | 17-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 3-8 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 33-14 | 14-8 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 18-16 | 12-8 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 15 (career-high), Amanda got to the quarter after defeating Jodie Anna Burrage 4-6 6-3 6-4 and Sonay Kartal 6-1 6-3.
In the 2nd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Kartal (6-1 6-3). During the match Anisimova scored 59 points vs Kartal’s 38. Anisimova was exceptionally aggressive to blast 19 winners.
About the serving games, Anisimova scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 3 double faults. Amanda Anisimova lost the serve twice and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Anisimova put 63% of her first serves in, winning 66% (19/29) of the points behind her 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Kartal 6 times after converting 86% of her break points (6/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Anisimova has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 57% of the points she played.
Her best result of the year was conquering the title in Doha where she overcame Jelena Ostapenko in the final 6-4 6-3.
The American has a compiled 21-10 win-loss record in 2025, 2-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in London
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Navarro | Anisimova |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 2 |
Tot Set | 3 | 5 |
Tot Games | 29 | 45 |
Pts | 94-102 | 168-129 |
Total Points | 196 | 297 |
Winners | 42 | 62 |
%Winners | 45% | 37% |
Navarro played 1 match while Anisimova competed in 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Emma Navarro surrendered 1 set, while Amanda Anisimova conceded 1 set. Navarro has played 2 set(s) less than Anisimova (3 vs 5). Therefore, Navarro played 16 games less than Anisimova. Emma scored 42 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Anisimova made 62 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Navarro | Anisimova |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 13 |
Avg per match | 0 | 6.5 |
1st in | 77/118 | 88/137 |
%1st in | 65% | 64% |
1st pts | 42/77 | 62/88 |
%1st pts | 55% | 70% |
2nd pts | 25/41 | 27/49 |
%2nd pts | 61% | 55% |
Navarro didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Anisimova managed to score 13 aces (6.5 per match). Navarro won 55% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Anisimova won 70% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Navarro | Anisimova |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 10 |
Converted | 2/3 | 10/20 |
% Converted | 67% | 50% |
Conceded | 13 | 9 |
Saved | 9 | 4 |
% Saved | 69% | 44% |
Times Broken | 4 | 5 |
The American broke her opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. The American surrendered her serve 4 times and she saved 69% of the break points that she conceded. The American broke her opponents 10 times with a 50% conversion rate. The American conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 44% of the break points that she conceded.
Navarro | |||
R2 Haddad Maia | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 1-6 7-64 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
pts | 94-102 | 94-102 | |
Total points | 196 | 196 | |
Winners | 42 | 42 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 77/118 | 77/118 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 42/77 | 42/77 | |
% 1st pts | 55% | 55% | |
2nd pts | 25/41 | 25/41 | |
% 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
Saved | 9/13 | 9 | |
Saved % | 69% | 69% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Anisimova | ||||
R1 Anna | R2 Kartal | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 29 | 16 | 45 | |
pts | 109-91 | 59-38 | 168-129 | |
Total points | 200 | 97 | 297 | |
Winners | 43 | 19 | 62 | |
%Winners | 39% | 32% | 37% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 12 | 1 | 13 | |
Double Faults | 8 | 3 | 11 | |
1st in | 59/91 | 29/46 | 88/137 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 63% | 64% | |
1st pts | 43/59 | 19/29 | 62/88 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 66% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 17/32 | 10/17 | 27/49 | |
% 2nd pts | 53% | 59% | 55% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
Converted | 4/13 | 6/7 | 10/20 | |
Converted % | 31% | 86% | 50% | |
Conceded | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
Saved | 3/6 | 1/3 | 4 | |
Saved % | 50% | 33% | 83% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Tennis Scores in London
- Asia Muhammad/Demi SchuursMuhammad/Demi Schuurs – Yulia Putintseva/Elena RybakinaPutintseva/Elena Rybakina (6-1 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Lyudmyla Kichenok/Erin RoutliffeKichenok/Erin Routliffe – Katie Boulter/Emma RaducanuBoulter/Emma Raducanu (6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pietro RondoniRondoni – Savriyan DanilovDanilov (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Andrea GuerrieriGuerrieri – Ronald SlobodchikovSlobodchikov (7-5 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Emma RaducanuRaducanu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emma NavarroNavarro – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Elena RybakinaRybakina (0-1) – H2H and prediction