Cristian Garin and Matej Dodig will square off in the quarter of the Bratislava 1 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 3:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cristian Garin who should win in 2 sets.
Cristian Garin -> 1.32
Matej Dodig -> 3.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Cristian Garin vs. Matej Dodig
This will be the 2nd time that Cristian Garin and Matej Dodig play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Garin (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Garin won 4-6 6-3 6-4 in the 1st round in the Braunschweig Challenger back in 2024.
Cristian Garin
25 - 11win/loss
110
17
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 32-14 | 5-4 | 23-8 | 1-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
2024 | 21-24 | 3-6 | 13-14 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 41-25 | 22-12 | 18-12 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 18-23 | 4-5 | 9-11 | 1-4 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 21-18 | 2-6 | 15-9 | 1-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 122, Christian reached the quarter after defeating Abedallah Shelbayh 6-1 7-6(3) and Filip Cristian Jianu 7-6(3) 6-1
.In the 2nd round, Christian had a good straight sets win against Cristian Jianu (7-63 6-1). During the match, Garin scored 72 points vs Cristian Jianu’s 54. Christian was extremely aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Garin managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Cristian Garin lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Garin put 70% of his first serves in, winning 77% (36/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. Garin broke Cristian Jianu 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Chilean hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to conquer 57% of the points he played.
Garin has favorable record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (296-209). 19-6 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Garin has an aggregate 197-114 record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Mauthausen Challenger where he overcame Tomas Barrios Vera in the final 3-6 6-1 6-4 and the Oeiras 5 Challenger where he overcame Mitchell Krueger in the final 7-6(3) 4-6 6-2.
Garin has an aggregate 25-11 win-loss record in 2025, 19-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava 1 Challenger
The Chilean has never competed in this tournament before.
Matej Dodig
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 12-18 | 0-0 | 12-14 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 46-26 | 14-5 | 30-20 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 43-16 | 1-2 | 38-12 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 376, Matej reached the quarter after defeating Daniel Cukierman 6-4 6-2, Mateus Alves 7-6(5) 6-2, Jaime Faria 7-5 2-0 ret. and Toby Alex Kodat 7-6(2) 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Dodig had a good straight sets win against Alex Kodat (7-62 6-3). During the match Dodig scored 77 points vs Alex Kodat’s 61. Matej was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Dodig scored 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Matej Dodig was extremely effective on serve to win 73% (30/41) of his 1st serve and 68% (15/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Dodig broke Alex Kodat 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Dodig started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to conquer 54% of the points he played.
The Croatian’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Bol.
Dodig has a compiled 12-15 win-loss record in 2025, 12-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava 1 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Garin | Dodig |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 4 |
Tot Set | 4 | 9 |
Tot Games | 40 | 75 |
Pts | 142-107 | 267-227 |
Total Points | 249 | 494 |
Winners | 67 | 108 |
%Winners | 47% | 40% |
Garin played 2 matches while Dodig competed in 4 matches. Dodig started his run from the qualifications while Garin had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Garin has played 5 set(s) less than Dodig (4 vs 9). Therefore, Garin played 35 games less than Dodig. The Chilean scored 67 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Matej scored 108 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Garin | Dodig |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 15 |
Avg per match | 4.5 | 3.8 |
1st in | 88/130 | 149/242 |
%1st in | 68% | 62% |
1st pts | 67/88 | 108/149 |
%1st pts | 76% | 72% |
2nd pts | 24/42 | 52/93 |
%2nd pts | 57% | 56% |
Garin managed to score 9 aces (4.5 per match). Dodig scored 15 aces (3.8 per match). Garin won 76% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Dodig won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Garin | Dodig |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 13 |
Converted | 6/10 | 13/28 |
% Converted | 60% | 46% |
Conceded | 9 | 17 |
Saved | 7 | 13 |
% Saved | 78% | 76% |
Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Garin broke his opponents 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Chilean conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. The Croatian broke his opponents 13 times with a 46% conversion rate. Dodig conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded.
Garin | ||||
R1 Shelbayh | R2 Cristian | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 7-63 | 7-63 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | 40 | |
pts | 70-53 | 72-54 | 142-107 | |
Total points | 123 | 126 | 249 | |
Winners | 31 | 36 | 67 | |
%Winners | 44% | 50% | 47% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
1st in | 41/63 | 47/67 | 88/130 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 70% | 68% | |
1st pts | 31/41 | 36/47 | 67/88 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 77% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 14/22 | 10/20 | 24/42 | |
% 2nd pts | 64% | 50% | 57% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | 6/10 | |
Converted % | 60% | 60% | 60% | |
Conceded | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 4/5 | 7 | |
Saved % | 75% | 80% | 78% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Dodig | ||||||
Q1 Cukierman | Q3 Alves | R1 Faria | R2 Alex | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | 7-65 6-2 | 7-5 2-0 ret. | 7-62 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 21 | 14 | 22 | 75 | |
pts | 60-51 | 69-64 | 61-51 | 77-61 | 267-227 | |
Total points | 111 | 133 | 112 | 138 | 494 | |
Winners | 24 | 33 | 21 | 30 | 108 | |
%Winners | 40% | 48% | 34% | 39% | 40% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 15 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 10 | |
1st in | 33/53 | 43/74 | 32/52 | 41/63 | 149/242 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 58% | 62% | 65% | 62% | |
1st pts | 24/33 | 33/43 | 21/32 | 30/41 | 108/149 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 77% | 66% | 73% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 13/20 | 14/31 | 10/20 | 15/22 | 52/93 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 45% | 50% | 68% | 56% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 13 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/6 | 4/7 | 3/8 | 13/28 | |
Converted % | 43% | 50% | 57% | 38% | 46% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 17 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 2/3 | 5/7 | 3/4 | 13 | |
Saved % | 100% | 67% | 71% | 75% | 157% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Christian GarinGarin – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction