Ann Li and Suzan Lamens will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Libema Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ann Li who should win in 3 sets.
Ann Li -> 1.78
Suzan Lamens -> 2.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Ann Li vs. Suzan Lamens
This will be the 2nd time that Ann Li and Suzan Lamens fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Li (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on grass.
The last time that they locked horns, Li won 6-1 6-4 in the qualifications in Hobart back in January 2025.
Ann Li
15 - 12win/loss
65
44
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 16-14 | 4-6 | 6-5 | 4-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2024 | 42-27 | 16-14 | 22-9 | 4-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 36-28 | 16-13 | 15-9 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 16-20 | 7-10 | 2-3 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 25-14 | 19-8 | 1-1 | 4-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 53, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Anastasia Potapova 7-5 6-2.
In the 1st round, Ann had a good straight sets win against Potapova (7-5 6-2). During the match, Li scored 71 points vs Potapova’s 57. Li was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Li blasted 6 aces and she committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Ann Li was quite efficient on serve to win 78% (32/41) of her 1st serve and 58% (7/12) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Li broke Potapova 4 times after converting 36% of her break points (4/11).
Li has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of her matches (246-166). 1-0 on grass in 2025. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Li has an overall 8-14 record in the last years on grass.
The American’s best result of the year was getting to the final in Singapore.
The American has a compiled 15-12 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Suzan Lamens
17 - 14win/loss
69
64
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 19-17 | 8-7 | 6-5 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2024 | 46-27 | 15-11 | 19-10 | 11-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 45-31 | 7-7 | 33-19 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 37-27 | 13-9 | 24-11 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
2021 | 48-27 | 21-9 | 22-14 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 72, the Dutch reached the 2nd round after defeating Yanina Wickmayer 6-3 0-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Suzan defeated Wickmayer (6-3 0-6 6-3). During the match Lamens scored 72 points vs Wickmayer’s 71. Lamens was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Lamens scored 4 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Suzan Lamens lost the serve 4 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Lamens put 52% of her first serves in, winning 68% (25/37) of the points behind her 1st serve and 47% (16/34) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Wickmayer 4 times after converting 67% of her break points (4/6).
Suzan’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in Rouen.
Lamens has a composed 17-14 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2024. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Li | Lamens |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 20 | 24 |
Pts | 71-57 | 72-71 |
Total Points | 128 | 143 |
Winners | 32 | 25 |
%Winners | 45% | 35% |
Both Li and Lamens played 1 match. At the moment, Suzan Lamens surrendered 1 set while Ann Li hasn’t conceded a set so far. Li has played 1 set(s) less than Lamens (2 vs 3). Therefore, Li played 4 games less than Lamens. Li scored 32 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Lamens fired 25 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Li | Lamens |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 4 |
Avg per match | 6 | 4 |
1st in | 41/53 | 37/71 |
%1st in | 77% | 52% |
1st pts | 32/41 | 25/37 |
%1st pts | 78% | 68% |
2nd pts | 7/12 | 16/34 |
%2nd pts | 58% | 47% |
Li fired 6 aces . Lamens blasted 4 aces . Li won 78% points behind her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Lamens won 68% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Li | Lamens |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 4 |
Converted | 4/11 | 4/6 |
% Converted | 36% | 67% |
Conceded | 1 | 9 |
Saved | 0 | 5 |
% Saved | 0% | 56% |
Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Ann broke her opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Ann surrendered her serve once and she saved 0% of the break points that she conceded. Lamens broke her opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 56% of the break points that she conceded.
Li | |||
R1 Potapova | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 71-57 | 71-57 | |
Total points | 128 | 128 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 41/53 | 41/53 | |
% 1st in | 77% | 77% | |
1st pts | 32/41 | 32/41 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Lamens | |||
R1 Wickmayer | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 0-6 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
pts | 72-71 | 72-71 | |
Total points | 143 | 143 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 37/71 | 37/71 | |
% 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
1st pts | 25/37 | 25/37 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 16/34 | 16/34 | |
% 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Tennis Scores in ‘s Hertogenbosch
- Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova – Anna BlinkovaBlinkova (6-0 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Bernarda PeraPera (6-1 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kento TakeuchiTakeuchi – Takuya KumasakaKumasaka (5-7 6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yuki MochizukiMochizuki – Shunrou TakeshimaTakeshima (6-1 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gengo KikuchiKikuchi – Ren NakamuraNakamura (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Soichiro MoritaniMoritani – Daisuke SumizawaSumizawa (6-2 4-6 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ko SuzukiSuzuki – Jordi Samper-MontanaSamper-Montana (6-4 0-6 7-66) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Carson BranstineBranstine – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – Lulu SunSun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Suzan LamensLamens – Ann LiLi (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kimberly BirrellBirrell – Yue YuanYuan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Elise MertensMertens (6-4) – H2H and prediction
- Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova – Greetje MinnenMinnen (1-0) – H2H and prediction