Dusan Lajovic and Nerman Fatic will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Perugia Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 2:00 pm on GRAND STAND. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dusan Lajovic who should win in 2 sets.
Dusan Lajovic -> 1.29
Nerman Fatic -> 3.34
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Dusan Lajovic vs. Nerman Fatic
There is no head to head record between Dusan Lajovic and Nerman Fatic since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Dusan Lajovic
18 - 19win/loss
119
23
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 36-33 | 6-11 | 28-18 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 17-23 | 3-7 | 13-11 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-28 | 9-9 | 18-13 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-30 | 4-11 | 24-15 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-28 | 8-10 | 5-9 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 137, Lajovic reached the 2nd round after defeating Rei Sakamoto 6-0 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Serbian had a good straight sets win against Sakamoto (6-0 6-4). During the match, Lajovic scored 58 points vs Sakamoto’s 38. Dusan was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lajovic managed to score 2 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Dusan Lajovic was quite effective on serve to win 72% (23/32) of his 1st serve and 67% (10/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Serbian broke Sakamoto 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Lajovic has a weak record in the last 10 years having won only 49% of his matches (253-265). 14-11 on clay in 2025. . In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Lajovic has a compiled 147-119 match record in the last years on clay.
Lajovic’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Girona Challenger.
The Serbian has an aggregate 18-19 win-loss record in 2025, 14-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Perugia Challenger
Lajovic has never competed in this tournament before.
Nerman Fatic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 47-18 | 2-1 | 44-15 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 23-26 | 3-5 | 19-20 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-28 | 0-1 | 35-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-27 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-26 | 1-1 | 30-22 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 305, Fatic reached the 2nd
round after beating Francesco Forti 6-4 6-4, Andrea Picchione 6-2 6-2 and Oriol Roca Batalla 2-6 7-6(5) 7-6(1).In the 1st round against Roca Batalla, The Bosnian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-65 7-61).During the match Fatic scored less points (4) than Roca Batalla. In fact, the world no. 137 won 124 points vs Roca Batalla’s. That means that Fatic was more focused during the important points. Nerman was quite aggressive to blast 55 winners.
Talking about serving, Fatic blasted 5 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Nerman Fatic lost the serve 4 times and he saved 14 break points. Furthermore, Fatic put 64% of his first serves in, winning 60% (55/91) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (30/52) on the 2nd serve. Nerman broke Roca Batalla twice after converting 20% of his break points (2/10).
Nerman’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Antalya,M15 Porec,M15 Dubrovnik and the Skopje Challenger.
Nerman has a composed 30-7 win-loss record in 2025, 30-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Perugia Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2021 and 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lajovic | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 70 |
| Pts | 58-38 | 244-217 |
| Total Points | 96 | 461 |
| Winners | 23 | 107 |
| %Winners | 40% | 44% |
Lajovic played 1 match while Fatic competed in 3 matches. Fatic started his run from the qualifications while Lajovic had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Nerman Fatic surrendered 1 set while Dusan Lajovic hasn’t conceded a set so far. Lajovic has played 5 set(s) less than Fatic (2 vs 7). Therefore, Lajovic played 54 games less than Fatic. The Serbian scored 23 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Bosnian struck 107 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lajovic | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2 |
| 1st in | 32/47 | 158/244 |
| %1st in | 68% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 23/32 | 107/158 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 10/15 | 49/86 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 57% |
Lajovic managed to score 2 aces . Fatic struck 6 aces (2 per match). Lajovic won 72% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Fatic won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lajovic | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 10 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 10/26 |
| % Converted | 57% | 38% |
| Conceded | 0 | 23 |
| Saved | 0 | 17 |
| % Saved | 0% | 74% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 6 |
Dusan broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Serbian pretty solid on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Fatic broke his opponents 10 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Bosnian conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 74% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lajovic | |||
| R1 Sakamoto | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 58-38 | 58-38 | |
| Total points | 96 | 96 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 32/47 | 32/47 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 23/32 | 23/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/15 | 10/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Fatic | |||||
| Q1 Forti | Q3 Picchione | R1 Roca Batalla | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-2 6-2 | 2-6 7-65 7-61 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 16 | 34 | 70 | |
| pts | 64-53 | 56-36 | 124-128 | 244-217 | |
| Total points | 117 | 92 | 252 | 461 | |
| Winners | 29 | 23 | 55 | 107 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 41% | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 35/54 | 32/47 | 91/143 | 158/244 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 68% | 64% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 29/35 | 23/32 | 55/91 | 107/158 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 72% | 60% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/19 | 9/15 | 30/52 | 49/86 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 60% | 58% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 2 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 5/7 | 2/10 | 10/26 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 71% | 20% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 | 18 | 23 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 3/4 | 14/18 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 75% | 78% | 153% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | |
Tennis Scores in Perugia Challenger
- Pierluigi BasileBasile – Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Gabriele PirainoPiraino (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Daniel RinconRincon (6-2 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Alex Marti PujolrasMarti Pujolras (6-2 4-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Andrea PicchionePicchione (4-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Federico BondioliBondioli – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee (3-6 7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (2-6 7-65 7-61) – See score progression
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Rei SakamotoSakamoto (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Bernard TomicTomic (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Lorenzo CarboniCarboni (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Luca NardiNardi – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Gabriele PirainoPiraino (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee (3-6 7-6(1) 6-4) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (2-6 7-6(5) 7-6(1)) – See score progression
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Rei SakamotoSakamoto (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Pierluigi BasileBasile – Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (7-6(6) 6-2) – See score progression
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Andrea PicchionePicchione (4-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stan WawrinkaWawrinka – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Dusan LajovicLajovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Francesco PassaroPassaro (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Taro DanielDaniel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-1) – H2H and prediction