Daniel Evans and Mees Rottgering will square off in the qualifications of the Libema Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 5. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Evans who should win in 3 sets.
Daniel Evans -> 1.666
Mees Rottgering -> 2.11
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniel Evans vs. Mees Rottgering
There is no head to head record between Daniel Evans and Mees Rottgering since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Daniel Evans
10 - 15win/loss
184
21
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22-25 | 8-10 | 6-7 | 1-3 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 18-26 | 8-11 | 3-8 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-27 | 11-15 | 5-7 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-27 | 19-13 | 4-7 | 6-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-24 | 12-11 | 6-6 | 3-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 213, Daniel reached the qualifications after beating Adam Walton 6-2 2-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Brit defeated Walton (6-2 2-6 6-3). During the match, Evans and Walton scored the same amount of points (79). However, the world no. 213 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The Brit was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Evans blasted 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Daniel Evans lost the serve 4 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Evans put 57% of his first serves in, winning 66% (33/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (17/38) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Walton 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Evans has good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (268-211). 1-1 on grass in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Evans has a compiled 49-27 win-loss record in the last years on grass.
Daniel has an overall 10-15 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Evans has never competed in this tournament before.
Mees Rottgering
16 - 13win/loss
617
612
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25-25 | 8-9 | 10-10 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 14-11 | 8-7 | 5-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 10-7 | 7-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 711 (career-high), Mees got to the qualifications after defeating Jelle Sels 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Sels (6-4 6-2). During the match Rottgering scored 65 points vs Sels’s 44. Mees was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Rottgering made 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Mees Rottgering was very efficient on serve to win 81% (25/31) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Rottgering broke Sels 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Rottgering’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M15 Antalya and M15 Klagenfurt.
Mees has a compiled 16-13 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Evans | Rottgering |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 25 | 18 |
| Pts | 79-79 | 65-44 |
| Total Points | 158 | 109 |
| Winners | 33 | 25 |
| %Winners | 42% | 38% |
Both Evans and Rottgering played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Daniel Evans lost 1 set while Mees Rottgering hasn’t lost a set so far. Evans has played 1 set more than Rottgering (3 vs 2). Therefore, Evans played 7 games more than Rottgering. The Brit scored 33 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch blasted 25 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Evans | Rottgering |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 6 |
| 1st in | 50/88 | 31/45 |
| %1st in | 57% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 33/50 | 25/31 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 17/38 | 9/14 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 64% |
Evans made 4 aces . Rottgering fired 6 aces . Evans won 66% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Rottgering won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Evans | Rottgering |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 4/13 |
| % Converted | 56% | 31% |
| Conceded | 11 | 3 |
| Saved | 7 | 2 |
| % Saved | 64% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 |
The Brit broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Evans surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponent 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. Rottgering conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Evans | |||
| Q1 Walton | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 79-79 | 79-79 | |
| Total points | 158 | 158 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 50/88 | 50/88 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 33/50 | 33/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/38 | 17/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 7/11 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 64% | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Rottgering | |||
| Q1 Sels | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 65-44 | 65-44 | |
| Total points | 109 | 109 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/45 | 31/45 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 25/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 9/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/13 | 4/13 | |
| Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Hubert HurkaczHurkacz (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas JarryJarry – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Reilly OpelkaOpelka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Jesper De JongDe Jong (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Aleksandar VukicVukic (0-1) – H2H and prediction